Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
949 results
0.33s
Oral argument — Magaly Hernandez v. Fairfax County
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2017
One was that he acted inappropriately vis-à-vis his girlfriend's estranged husband because he was trying to find out whether or not he was having an affair. … Could a reasonable jury have thought, you know what, put the period after cease all investigation of Ms.
49 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Amar Endris
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2016
The Court also required that defendants promptly accept the government's offer to participate in the criminal act. … Here, there's this two-month period where the government offered, had offered the weapon once. And in this two-month period, Mr. Andrus didn't go out and buy a legal firearm.
34 min of audioOral argument — Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Meritain Health, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2026
And then you have these other couple of Ninth Circuit cases that, to me, just seemed like to pull the direct control element not from Inwood but out of thin air. … Did they have knowledge of the act that was occurring? Yes, they had knowledge of the act.
67 min of audioOral argument — Wicomico Nursing Home v. Lourdes Padilla
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2018
Well, with respect to the people who are receiving benefits, would you comment on the applicability of the Antracan case to that? The Antracan case... … The resident himself or herself during a period of competence were a family member, right? That is correct.
45 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Demarcus Ivey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2022
She did not record any of their comments with respect to Mr. Ivey, or the time it took to identify him, or how certain they were, or anything else. … Yes, Hobbs Act. Thank you. This Court's decision in Mathis holds that Hobbs Act robbery is a crime of violence, a completed Hobbs Act robbery. And Mr.
46 min of audioOral argument — Quinton Brown v. Nucor Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2014
American Cast Iron Pipe, has always said that those type of department preferences, or prior experience credits, perpetuate discrimination and violate the Act. … The only other thing I'd want to comment is – That red light is not just a suggestion. Oh, I'm over. Oh, goodness. I am so sorry. Go ahead if you have something burning. Go ahead. No, no, no.
42 min of audioOral argument — William Carmack v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2020
Maul even during the period after the sanctions had been granted? Yes, Judge Gallagher, we didn't file a motion. I don't want to tell you wrong about this. … Hardy, let me ask you about this in the record and ask you to comment on it. Because I understand the record, once Mr.
40 min of audioOral argument — San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund v. Syneos Health Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2022
That's sort of like a record company saying I got a bunch of good acts coming in. It's going to be a good year. And then somebody says, well, how many of them are going to be gold records? … So by definition, the way this statement is, and this is an oral comment in an analyst call, the statement is the pipeline is what the market is. You've got to go win the business.
36 min of audioOral argument — United States ex rel. Deborah Sheldon v. Allergan Sales, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2022
It ignores three different notice and comment periods associated with the statute. … We said in our comment letter, which is incorporated by reference in the complaint, I want to read what it says.
94 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Carl Mann, II
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2025
Could you move on to the Speedy Trial Act? I mean, not the Speedy Trial Act, we were talking about before. Long wait for me. The wiretap issue. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Absolutely. I'm happy to. … Lang's comments. I'm happy to switch to the necessity issue. The underlying affidavit on the face of it, on the terms of how it was granted, was plainly appropriate at that time.
36 min of audioOral argument — Ansberto Gonzalez v. Kenneth Cuccinelli, II
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 27, 2020
And under the Administrative Procedure Act, when an application is presented to the agency, they must act within a reasonable amount of time. … And I see I'm out of time, Your Honor, if I could just comment on that. I think you're hitting the root of the problematic nature of the rule that the agency is pushing for.
53 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Terrence Smith
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013
McAbeer testified to, that was escalating over a period of time. And with that escalation, she also began escalating her contact with the police department. … Counsel made a couple of comments. One that I would say initially he started his argument by saying that the defendant was convicted of an act that is no longer a crime.
23 min of audioOral argument — Brandon Raub v. Michael Campbell
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2015
And yet he was seized from his home and later confined to a hospital for a period of time. Now, the central evidence in this case is the report of Dr. Martin. … A trained mental health professional would know better than to make those comments.
42 min of audioOral argument — National Veterans Legal v. DOD
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2020
And your honor's comments are exactly why the court should affirm here. This is going to Judge Diaz. … She was, I think, correctly pointing out your comments, the comments you just made really heighten my concern with what you're asking because what you're saying, well, there are some of these decisions
55 min of audioOral argument — J. Irvin Beatley v. Charles Ayers, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2020
So, those would be my comments on that. Thank you. Go ahead, Patrullo. All right. … But I want to comment about Mr.
45 min of audioOral argument — PPL EnergyPlus, LLC v. Douglas Nazarian
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2014
Now, I have a couple of comments. So you're saying you're still setting a rate even if the revenue comes from two different sources? … One is the length of it and the duration of it, the 20-year period as opposed to the three-year period, and the other is the fact that it attempts to skew the federal auction and to get low bids on the
44 min of audioOral argument — FTC v. Kristy Ross
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2023
Of course, that's a time period that's largely beyond Ms. Ross's control, right? It is a time period that's beyond Ms. Ross's control. … On to several of my friend's other comments. On Garibaldi, you know, there's a lot of over-reading of several of the cases in the FTC's presentation.
36 min of audioOral argument — Robert Polfliet v. Kenneth Cuccinelli, II
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2020
I see my time is running out, and I would just, with your permission, say one last comment. … And so when the government stands up here and says, no, no, no, you just got to go a different way, that's not a path I can take, period. Even if Mr.
36 min of audioOral argument — Rhonda Hutton v. National Board of Examiners
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2018
It's all within the same time period. … They have specific time periods in which notice must be given. Vermont, 14 days. Florida, 30 days.
40 min of audioOral argument — Brawner Builders, Inc. v. Northern Assurance Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2015
I'll take guidance from one of Judge Motz's prior comments. … It was during the policy period. They're not saying any exclusions apply.
38 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.