Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,162 results
0.37s
Oral argument — Bunnett & Company, Inc. v. Frank Dores, et
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2019
between January 13th and February 1st of 2016, that there was some act, direct or indirect, of solicitation for the purpose of creating a business relationship during that time period. … If Doars had not acted in a sales capacity and in—prior to the two-week period, and then he got paid a salary during the two-week period, not for soliciting customers, there would be no violation of the
41 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Christopher Landreneau
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2020
He had a full airing out of it. He gave his reasons etc. He had the declaration and so forth. … It doesn't give the alleged act that occurred. It just gives broad terms that tracks the statutory definition of the crimes charged.
42 min of audioOral argument — Keva Sampson v. ASC Industries
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2015
Oglesby, was acting on behalf of Ms. Sampson at that time. So when— Acting on behalf of the state? Pardon? Acting on behalf of the state? … And his fourth finding on page 18 was Oglesby was acting on behalf of Sampson during all relevant periods of this.
44 min of audioOral argument — John Matamoros v. William Stephens, Director
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2014
At 14, his mother had to go to the bathroom with him to make sure he cleaned himself. She had to dress him. … What do you do with your opposition's comment that the Court of Criminal Appeals is not following its own Brasenio factors based upon this in the statute that say that you should have a clinical assessment
59 min of audioOral argument — Donald Cuba v. Julia Pylant
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2015
Yeah, but clearly here we're past the year, but the Act clearly states that if a hearing has not occurred, then the motion is overruled, and that's when the time period begins. … But clearly the Act says that if you do not have your hearing in a certain period of time, then your motion is denied.
42 min of audioOral argument — Wages and White Lion Invest v. FDA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2026
Again, another way that FDA acted arbitrarily and capriciously here. Now I want to, I said to put a pin in for a second, the ways that FDA changed the study requirements. … comment on that.
63 min of audioOral argument — In re: Deepwater Horizon
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2015
I mean this is a normal Jones Act case, but even in the context of BP being sued by a lot of people as a result of this oil spill. … BP had told Tidewater we've settled the case, we want you to indemnify us, and Tidewater kept writing back saying exercise your 14-day period of appeal, your right to appeal within the 14-day time period
41 min of audioOral argument — Petrobras Amer v. Samsung Heavy Indus
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2021
This was not Samsung's only act of fraudulent concealment. Samsung met alone with the rogue officials, Nestor Severo and Renato Duque. … the if there are any questions your honor i'm happy to address them now i don't think so i was going to ask if you had anything further but it sounds like you do so well i just want to make one more comment
41 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Aguilar-Torres
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2025
And also, this is a plain air because it wasn't me below as well. That's an additional problematic wrinkle for Mr. … I didn't interpret her comments that way. I interpreted her comments as saying there's something different between.
73 min of audioOral argument — OK Firefighters Pension v. Six Flags Entmt
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2024
When did the class period end? The class period terminates February 20, 2020, with the premarket announcement that the project had been abandoned. … Rizzo, Hamilton made the following comment to Your Honors, as well as Judge Southwick, Judge Wiener, we acknowledge you were not part of the party at that time, but he said, quote, because the principal
41 min of audioOral argument — Spann v. FedEx Freight
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2025
The Fifth Circuit has long and repeatedly held that the limitations period starts running when a plaintiff knows of the discriminatory act and not when a plaintiff later perceives a discriminatory motive … Did she receive workers' compensation during the intervening period of time? She did. Can you discuss the claim about the gun and all of that and whether that's time barred?
29 min of audioOral argument — Danny Delaval v. PTech Drilling Tubulars, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2016
And what you've done with that comment is really zero in on the real issue in this case, we would submit. … It's a two-page summary of progress notes, a couple other comments that are relevant at an overarching level.
41 min of audioOral argument — Gil Ramirez Group, L.L.C. v. Houston Indep
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2015
The government is going to be liable whether it can commit an intentional act or not. Its officers can commit an intentional act. … Was it clear in the air from the previous questions about what had happened while trying to put everything under the rug publicly, or was it totally rigged yet again?
46 min of audioOral argument — Todd Babin v. Quality Energy Services, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2017
exclusive purpose of providing benefits to participants and their beneficiaries, and it sets forth a prudent man standard with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence then prevailing that a prudent man acting … Just a couple of quick comments. The COBRA statute, as Your Honor mentioned, is obviously not the same as an ERISA statute. It does not have the same background in trust law that ERISA does.
30 min of audioOral argument — Great American Life Ins Co. v. Ava Tanner
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2019
Well, the court said that, but we objected, and we cited this in our brief, several places in our brief where we commented that this is hearsay affidavit that contradicts what her prior testimony was. … I asked her does she have any evidence that Don acted but for his own free will. She says no. She wasn't present. That's in the record 1286 through 1287.
43 min of audioOral argument — Ruston Louisiana Hospital Co. v. Lincoln Health Fo
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2020
There are three acts. … And then comment E was the second part that I referenced. All right.
35 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jordan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2023
A reward for some future act that the public official will take and may have already determined to take, or for a past act. … I mean, she had campaign signs with her picture on it saying no new apartments near our neighborhoods, period.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Walter Reed
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2018
There they declined to construe the statute with regard to official act and said we're going to not let the government set the standard for good government for state and local officials. … And the crimes took place over the same time period.
33 min of audioOral argument — Texas Democratic Party v. Greg Abbott, Gove
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2020
But both the Texas Supreme Court and the Texas Code Construction Act say otherwise. … Well, let's say we air and somehow another apply Anderson verdict. How does that play out for you?
50 min of audioOral argument — Chad Wilson v. City of Southlake
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2019
of 1973 or the Disabilities Act. … I'm not talking about the act of handcuffing himself. I'm saying once he's handcuffed, is the comment necessary and reasonable?
34 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.