Documents

Oral argument — Satco Products, Inc. v. Thread Group, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2021

If you assign that ITU past that date, you violate 1060 and Section 10 of the Lanham Act. Well, Mr. Weiss, this is Judge Prost. … But again, during the Embarcadero period did become available to the public as well.

Oral argument — MAHER v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2011

Published it in the Federal Register, saying you can comment. Didn't even say come in. You can comment. Is this the first time that you've raised that point in court? No, Your Honor. … The 28 U.S.C. 2501 establishes a six-year limitations period to bring a claim in the Court of Federal Claims. Because Mr.

Oral argument — BillJCo, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2025

So what we submitted was evidence from our expert that said in a PicoNet, you have a master which acts as basically a hub for communications. … I understand there was a period of discussion, an extended period of discussion with Apple, correct? This may not apply to this case, but I'd like to hear your view.

Oral argument — Woodworth v. Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2009

You said the email involved comments by his first-line supervisor. That what he was not the decision-maker. Right. And the second-line... The decision-maker was Colonel Armstrong. Right. … as a personnel action for purposes of the Whistleblower Protection Act and the agency did not challenge that below and did not challenge that on appeal.

Oral argument — Sunpreme Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2018

If we agree with you on jurisdiction, do we have to deal with whether Customs was acting within the scope of its authority? No, Your Honor. … In response to Judge Rainer's comment about mitigating harm, you're precisely correct.

Oral argument — Weeks Marine v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2009

But here, given that environmental windows compress the time period for dredging in much of the region, for example, hopper dredges are limited to a December through March, a four-month time period, given … Final comment, Mr. Payne?

Oral argument — Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2015

First, I'd like to respond to some of counsel's comments about claim construction. … But acts are never asked in the district court or in this court that collect be construed to mean gathered together.

Oral argument — Wordtech Sys v. Integrated NTWRK

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2010

So the only possible infringers were INSC and the two individuals who only acted as employees. … period of default.

Oral argument — Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2025

And that's the only reading that gives a sensible result in the Hatch-Waxman Act, where a patentee gets credit for the period of time where they had a patent in effect, but they effectively couldn't make … I want to respond to the comment that we are assuming a definition of issue. We're not.

Oral argument — Proctor & Gamble v. Kraft Foods

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2008

Rooklage made a comment during his presentation to Your Honors, which I think is important to correct. … Everything is moved now that she's stayed in the act. She went to a preliminary injunction motion. Well, that's what stays do. Stays put a state of disrepair. But what happens on that time period?

Oral argument — NATIONAL ORG OF VET ADV v. SHINSEKI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2012

That was a good act by the Justice Department, rather than coming up here and defending the indefensible. … And it's specifically for the failure of the notice and comment procedure under 553. In their blue brief, NOVA had raised a procedural and a substantive ground.

Oral argument — Michael Simon Design v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2010

Specter that the president's authority to act is not contingent on the secretary's and commission's fulfillment of all the procedural requirements imposed upon them by the 1990 Act. … Suppose Congress had said, in making the recommendation commission, you must allow a 180-day period of comment, and the commission had terminated the period of comment after 160 days.

Oral argument — Papierfabrik August Koehler SE v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2018

This is simply a mathematical error that Kohler was trying to bring to Commerce's attention when Commerce reopened the record and specifically invited comments on this topic. … the tail end of period of review 2.

Oral argument — NuCor Corporation v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2010

Here Commerce was faced with the fact that the respondent had already capitalized this entire time period. … Now, I wonder if you could comment on the question of whether the evidence adequately shows a connection between those three loans, I think the four, the five, and the 10.425 million loans and the foreign

Oral argument — JAPAN CASH MACHINE v. MEI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2010

Does it matter that they, at least by that act, recognized that the marking requirement did exist? … Does it make a difference if a party is acting deliberately or not?

Oral argument — Blue & Gold Fleet LP v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2007

Judge Miller, in her comments, said that had the Service Contract Act applied, as we now know it should have, the evaluation would have been different for all offerors. … Gardner made a comment that Blue and Gold had gone to the district court to seek a declaratory judgment with regard to the Service Contract Act. That's not true.

Oral argument — National American v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2007

Now the ICW comment, and I'm going to refer to it as a comment, I think is clearly dicta. There are seven decisions, I believe, in the Court of Federal Claims that characterize it as dicta. … That comment, as you mentioned, is not even attributed to Blue Fox.

Oral argument — Kalin v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2006

Pre the 88 Act. Right. So. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims had not been established, so Mr. Kalin could not have appealed the Court's decision in 86. … It leaves us up in the air as to whether they're talking about the new and material evidence question or the ultimate entitlement to benefits. Yes. And so which is it? To continue with Judge Bryson.

Oral argument — Somers v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2018

Brower, the comparador, who has complaints over a lengthy period of time. We have an acute situation with Ms. … Your comment?

Oral argument — Renda Marine v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2007

You can ignore that comment. Counsel, how do the counterclaims differ from the claims that were involved in the suit? … If the day after the November 2002 decision, the contractor had any time within the one-year period. Any time within the one-year period.