Documents

Oral argument — Whitaker v. Wedbush Securities, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2019

So in the drafting of it, they made a deliberate decision to write on a clean slate and to treat the funds transfer as a unique method of payment to be governed under unique rules that address the particular … Just a couple of comments. While you're looking for your comments, I have a question.

Oral argument — People v. Arredondo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2023

That's just my comment. … But the other thing is, are you arguing that the injury that is supposed to make this a felony can only happen while hot pursuit or people are moving either on their feet or in their car or in the air

Oral argument — In Interest of A.P.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2013

Phelps admitted that during the first nine-month period following the adjudication of neglect or abuse, she didn't make reasonable progress. … Obviously you're going to act out. Obviously you're going to have problems. And it could even result in a slide in her grades.

Oral argument — People v. Ferrell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2022

That is part of their own clean hands argument. I'll address it now. … You can't run for township office if you're a convicted felon, period. And I would say my argument has two prongs on the unconstitutionality.

Oral argument — People v. Hale

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2025

So the jury's thinking was This defendant acted intentionally in count two And he acted intentionally in the vehicular homicide count There is no evidence whatsoever That they even consider that he acted … And The Reason For That Is That If You Did It Would Be No Cumulative Air Review Ever.

Oral argument — Przybycien v. Liu

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2012

I don't think it's a useless act. I think it's an act that's required under the law to preserve the appeal, and that was not done in this case. … And also, when the plaintiff does testify that he was propelled forward with his hand going up in the air, when Dr.

Oral argument — Snellenbarger v. State of Illinois

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2011

I mean, in my view, you know, the court is to act publicly and the court is to act, you know, to give it, you know, its reasons and to act, you know, all of those kinds of things. … The clerk repeatedly told us they knew nothing about a decision when we were asking on a very specific, periodic basis.

Oral argument — Stein v. Krislov

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2013

motion because the plaintiff did not meet that burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the cpa did not immunize mr krisloff's conduct that was aired for multiple reasons the first i think … that's in keeping with illinois public policy at all that's why these absolute one question with regards to the issue of meritless uh and it hasn't been addressed um there's an allegation that the libel comments

Oral argument — Mertes v. Village of Mount Prospect

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2024

Contrary to what the snarky comment made by the appellate court, that there's nowhere in the statute that TCEBA is a lifetime benefit. … Correct so, and that squares with the no act case. The no act case says the benefits attached on the date that eligibility is determined.

Oral argument — People v. Coty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 27, 2018

He read Judge Tooman's comments about his reluctance to give him the mandatory sentence. He said that he read the reports of the medical experts. … Every time he gets out within a short period of time, he is getting back in for some serious offense. These are not minor offenses.

Oral argument — Bell v. Don Prudhome Racing

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 17, 2010

It was a down period. There was no drag racing taking place around the country at the time. So he's at home. His residence was in Illinois? Yes, it was. Okay. He was at home during this time period. … What if he or she is driving from one state to another or in the air flying over states? Why would – because they have their cell phone and are in Indiana versus Illinois versus Florida.

Oral argument — People v. Cox

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2019

The appellant asks this Court to consider the Child Advocacy Act, 55 ILCS 80-1. … Both involved acts of penetration, penis to vagina.

Oral argument — Estes v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2013

what was, was there an air conditioned room, and there's no way this stroke could have occurred. … So every time an employer chews out an employee, we've got potential case under the act. No, it has to be greater stress than the general public.

Oral argument — People v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2025

And then the next act of aggression is Mr. … Now, Your Honors, I do want to briefly comment on a few other points in the case. One is, what happens after?

Oral argument — In Matter of A.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2014

Are there any other questions or comments? No. So the status, let's assume that the decision stands that Matthew H or whatever, Matthew H is legally not the father. … At the time of this case, he was working at the maintenance company for General Tire that does the cleaning of the factory.

Oral argument — Passafiume v. Jurak

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2023

But briefly, I just want to comment on the appropriate standard of review. … Many of us have lived through higher interest periods than 2-3%. And those on the jury did likewise. And in their wisdom, they didn't have to accept that very conservative estimate on Dr.

Oral argument — 1-18-2538

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2020

Can you tell us specifically what the state said that reinforce that Yes, they made a number of comments. … All right, I'll move on to the, well, one last comment.

Oral argument — In the interests of J.S.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2018

Certainly, this court should act on non-constitutional grounds first, and in that spirit, Mr. … But your whole premise is that the second order is vague because she didn't really clean it up enough.

Oral argument — Clemons v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2013

And that's just pulled out of thin air. That the next owner of the vehicle could do with the warranty what they want as having the warranty rights. … But why should she assume, or why should anyone assume, that New York Auto has the authority to act on behalf of Nissan and eviscerate Nissan's warranty? It's not acting on behalf of Nissan.

Oral argument — People v. Battle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2023

Beginning with the 1st issue, the court aired and allowing Mr battle to represent himself. … However, where there is no air, there cannot be plain air, and this court should affirm defendant's convictions on issue one. People also proved defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.