Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.81s
Opposition Brief — Mercer v. Thomas
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005
C. 243, 399 S.E.2d 783 (1991) | SB-4 & App. 115) Placek v. City of Sterling Heights, 405 Mich. 638, 275 N.W.2d 511 (1979) SB-4 & App. 114 Scott v. … C. 243, 399 S.E.2d 783 (1991) Placek v, City of Sterling Heights, 405 Mich. 638, 275 N.W.2d 511 (1979) Scott v.
546 U.S. 824Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master — Arizona v. California
Supreme Court brief · Exceptions to the Report of the Special Master · 1962
Ex. 38 (Water Delivery Contract: United States and MWD, April 24, 1930) Tr. 251) ; Ariz. Ex. 39 (Amended Water Contract: United States and MWD, September 28, 1931, Tr: 252); Ariz. … Ex. 32 (Water Delivery Contract between United States and Arizona, Feb. 9, 1944, Tr.-248) ; Report, p. 399, Appx. 5. 39See note 6, supra. "Report, pp. 221-37.
370 U.S. 930Amicus Curiae Brief — South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Transcript of Oral Argument at 9-24, Erickson v. Feather decided with DeCoteau v. … at 427 n.2, 446-447, Rosebud, 430 U.S. at 586, 601 n.24, 613-615 n.47, 615-616 n.48. 15 in common.” Yankton I, 522 U.S. at 358.
530 U.S. 1261Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
As early as February 24, 1983, the class attorney noted “dissention in class and distribution formula.” … Therefore, petitioners are unable to see that any distinction can be found to justify the split of the circuits in the case within the case, Pettway III; Pettway IV; and Pettway VI (the instant case). 24
467 U.S. 1243Petitioners Brief — Apodaca v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1972
New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970), that the Sixth Amendment jury trial right is fully applicable in state criminal cases, by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment. 399 U.S. at 86-90, "Id, at 90-92. … Dated: December 24, 1970
406 U.S. 404Amicus Curiae Brief — Carpenter v. Murphy, 139 S. Ct. 626 (2018) (No. 17-1107)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 421 (1994). … Mississippi Band of 24 Choctaw Indians, 136 S.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 26, 2026
Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 534-535 (1925); Meyer, 262 U.S. at 399-400. … Hecox, Docket No. 24-38, 104 F.4th 1061 (9th Cir. 2023); West Virginia v. B.P.J., Docket No. 24-43, 98 F.4th 542 (4th Cir. 2024).
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2006
Barriteau, 399 A.2d 563 UR UP cde ed eT or ar de ae 12 Doe v. Binker, 492 A.2d 857 (D.C. 1985) Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVay, 431 A.2d 543 a i EEG Gs he ha GAs ede a 26 Fitzgerald v. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966)............ 30 Hackney v. Morelite Construction, D.C. Corp., 418 A.2d 1062 (D.C. 1980) Lloward Univ. v. Lacy, 828 A.2d 733 (D.C. 2003)......... 27 Huyhes v.
546 U.S. 1215Reply Brief — Save Palisade Fruitlands v. Todd
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2002
NLRB, No. 01-518, 2002 WL 1357297, at *6 (U.S., June 24, 2002) (the right to petition is one of the most precious of the liberties safeguarded by the Bill of Rights). … Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970) (persons who are not owners of property may not be barred from voting in a bond referendum); Cipriano v.
537 U.S. 814Brief for Appellant — Robert W. Blanchette et al., v. Connecticut General Insurance Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellant · 1974
Supp. 2d 24, cert. denied sub nom. Port Authority Trans-Hudson v. … New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 992, 428 (1970).
419 U.S. 102Jurisdictional Statement — Mandel v. Bradley
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1977
Reeves, 275 Md. 599 (1975) ...........00.. 24 Rosario v. Rockefeller, 410 U.S. 752 (1973) ........ 19 Salera v. Tucker, 399 F. Supp. 1258 (E.D. Pa. 1975), aff'd summarily sub nom., Tucker v. … Tucker, 399 FS. 1258 (E.D. Pa. 1975), aff'd summarily sub nom. Tucker v. Salera, _..
432 U.S. 173Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Naftali Dominguez Zenon, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 26, 2024
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970), is impossible to square with the ruling in Ramos v. Louisiana, 140 S. … New York, 399 U.S. 117, 122-123 (1970) (citation omitted) (Harlan, J., concurring in the result in Williams).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Fellers v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Ct. 1602 (1966) ....... 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, 14, 21, 24, 29 Moran v. Burbine, 475 U. S. 412, 89 L. Ed. 2d 410, EE ne me 14, 24, 26 Nardone v. United States, 308 U. S. 338, 84 L. … /d., at 399.
540 U.S. 519Opposition Brief — Smith v. Baker
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1972
U.S. at 399, note. … New Maven In- clusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (1970).
409 U.S. 890Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Anita Bryant, Petitioner v. Delaware County Treasurer, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 14, 2023
Kelley, 158 N.E.3d 396, 399-400 n.l (Ind. Ct. … See id. at 399 n.2 (observing that a ' «/ lack of jurisdiction cannot be waived by the parties and is an issue that can be raised at any time).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Abetubokun Adesioye, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 15, 2022
Brown, 232 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2000) 6 U.S. v. … These cases were consolidated on January 24, 2001. (JA 8).
Petitioners Brief — Lewis v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1996
Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 (1970) ...........6555. 24 Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 GOODE + 0.00 secccccsacecsceseeseees 5, 8, 12, 18, 19, 20 Blanton v. … L.R. 917, 923-24 (1926).
518 U.S. 322Appellees Brief — Boston & C. Mining Co. v. Montana Ore Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1903
Rep. 399. … of the proposition that the jurisdiction of the United States Court is limited, and that the more recent statutes passed with reference to its jerisdiction had the purpose of circumscribing and —24
188 U.S. 632Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1953
After full administrative proceedings, * the ¥ ay original complaint was issued on June 24, 1948 (R. 1-19). ’ Extensive hearings were held before a member of the Board as hearing officer, the hearing … Ten (c), R. 399). The Board concluded that Trans- america had the ‘‘purpose and the power’’ to con- tinue to acquire additional banks (ibid.; Par.
346 U.S. 901
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.