Documents

Oral argument — Hannah Fredrickson v. Starbucks Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2016

If we decide that the Tax Injunction Act doesn't apply, where are you? Then we would devolve to comity. The fact that federal courts shouldn't be mucking about in state court tax regimes. Period. … If they're going to make up a number out of thin air, then they have to put that in box eight on the W-2 and not withhold based on that number.

Oral argument — Sharon Thomas v. The Salvation Army

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2016

Thomas sufficiently pled discrimination claims under the Fair Housing Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Rehabilitation Act? … Thomas's personal circumstances in that interim period.

Oral argument — Everardo Carrillo v. Schneider Logistics, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2012

No, but not acting as an officer of SLI, acting for SLTD. SLI was a defendant in the case. She submitted that as Secretary-Treasurer of SLI. That's what her declaration says. … You have engaged in direct acts of retaliation.

Oral argument — United States v. Anita Sharma

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2021

And the court did not clearly air. She was an average participant. Did she have the role of Rajeshwar Singh? And did she have the role of Surjit Singh? No. … So her intent from the beginning was to gain equity in-house, lie about the paperwork to get the loan, and she acted like a straw buyer.

Oral argument — Paulson,III v. Daniels

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2005

And I think the record shows that a comment period was open for more than three years until December of 2000, and no comments were submitted by these gentlemen. … Meaning, other people might have made comments during that period. Yes, they did. In fact, 150 people did make comments.

Oral argument — Leroy Holsey v. William Knipp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2016

In terms of the previous five parole violations, I recall that one of them was for the misdemeanor, for an act that ended up in a misdemeanor conviction as well. … Your Honor, regarding counsel's comment that the violation in this case was intentional, that is not in the state court record.

Oral argument — United States v. Robert Cardena

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2015

I thought the comment, I thought the comment was odd, though, because she had to approve each one of those, right? … That's how I understand her comments to read. I also think that Judge Rovner's comments during the hearing… Which is why she said she didn't think she should consider them. I'm sorry?

Oral argument — Mendoza-Mazariegos v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2007

So although it was a long period of time for an immigration case, it was all at the none of the continuance requests were by Mr. … Bell Gardens was developed by Alonzo Bell, who developed Bell Air, who discovered oil and Brea, and they were next to it. So they built Bell Air, Bell, Bellflower, Bell Gardens. Absolutely.

Oral argument — California Trout v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2009

They were one day after the comment period on the EA. We were within the comment period on the EA. So we were before. It had not even expired when we made our motion. It had expired. … In other words, the comment, the intervention period goes by, the comment period goes by, the final EIS comes back, and then the intervention goes. Two particular cases.

Oral argument — United States v. Slape

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2022

So if the trial court never acquired jurisdiction, period, as a matter of the indictment, then the trial court would never be able to grant a 48, 48A motion because it never acquired jurisdiction. … In our view, uh, they follow directly, um, because there doesn't need to be anything to wipe the slate clean, and I think, um, the, uh, the Macklin case, uh, establishes that principle, even if, I think

Oral argument — Berkley Specialty Ins v. Masterforce Construction Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2022

Comments in those cases and said. That the natural foreseeable acts such as rainfall. Which tend to exacerbate the damage effect or consequences. Cause ab initio by faulty workmanship. … That would be awardable under the telephone consumer protection act. That act provides for trouble damages and attorney's fees.

Oral argument — United States v. Kunz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 30, 2022

I didn't read that part, but including, but not limited to, and then I list the uses in private browsing, using computer evidence cleaning utilities, using encrypted email accounts, and so on. … in the security plan case where even where there's a carve out that they don't have to take those steps there's still an obligation on the behalf of the defendant when it purchases technology to not act

Oral argument — Correnia Profitt v. Highlands Hospital Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2024

Undoubtedly, she committed numerous acts of negligence, which she conceded, and we put all of those in the pleadings. Okay. … Is there a delay within a period of time, wherever that period of time might fall, if we're not sure where it fell exactly?

Oral argument — Devin Brosnan v. Keisha Lance Bottoms

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2025

in order to clean up the police department and to assure the community that we are on top of what we perceive to be a problem. … So the statements made by your client are commenting on the video. And so any problem sort of is caused by the video, not by your client.

Oral argument — People v. Bean

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2025

Rainia never testified in her or never said in the 911 call that the victim had his hand up in the air. And moreover, even as the trial court noted, let's assume his hand or fist was in the air. … They talked about the fact that the defendant was heavier and that he was acting belligerently.

Oral argument — United States v. Prawl

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2025

First, to consider the constructive amendment claim that was raised in the supplemental brief under the plain air rule and under rule 52B. … We could just treat it as a drug-trafficking crime period. Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Dwight Gooding

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2014

He would have said, Your Honor, let me say first of all that none of these people, none of the comments you're making reflect Dwight Gooding. … Sentencing Reform Act, I mean, the guidelines would have required a minimum sentence of 110 months.

Oral argument — United States v. Fencl

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2026

It does not apply just because an officer is acting with subjective goodwill. … We are not asking whether he acted in subjective bad faith.

Oral argument — United States v. Fredrick Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2021

He talked with them about sexual acts that they performed in the past, sexual acts that he liked to perform with them. … In his meeting with the officers, he did indicate that he never intended to actually have any kind of sexual acts with the minors himself, but he would have probably watched them performing acts on each

Oral argument — Driftless Area Land Conservanc v. Michael Huebsch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2021

And I'm simply referring to cleaning up a little bit the sanitized facts you got from Ms. Whiting. … Those are completed acts. Those are not ongoing acts.