Documents

Oral argument — 21-3363Jaswinder SinghJames Calabreseetal. v. Uber Technologies,INC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2022

So it's on Uber to prove the act applies to the people they want to solve it on. … Vangelis' argument, which is no matter how you slice it, this is 2% of trips, period. You're done.

Oral argument — Marriage of Rosenberger

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2024

Our position is that the authority in which we presume the court was acting, because neither in Mr. … Rosenberger's request to the trial court, nor in the trial court's order, did it specify what authority it was acting under.

Oral argument — United States v. Bowman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2003

Well, I can't disagree with the court's comments in that regard. And the trial counsel's performance. … And in point of fact, the notes that were due three years later were secured by FAA notes, security interest notes with Northeast Air.

Oral argument — Vella v. MacD Helicopters, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2026

That's why GARA has a rolling limitations period for servicers and other entities that provide replacement parts. … , this act being GARA.

Oral argument — Trump v. CASA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2025

We can act quickly. … If you prevail here, the original executive order had a 30-day period before it took effect.

Oral argument — People v. Himber

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2020

The incisions that were shown were clean. And these were very clinical photographs that the State was allowed to use to present its evidence and to present its theory of the case. … Just a couple of ‑‑ sorry, I just have a couple brief comments.

Oral argument — Henry v. Bank of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2012

First, a quick comment on the standard of review because an issue was raised about that in the Capolese brief. … Olson, that is an intervening act. But she never got the money at all.

Oral argument — Dana Taliaferro v. Lone Star Impl & Elec Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2017

That is not an unlawful act. It is maybe a violation of a company policy. … Typically, well, typically you take the employee's, the company's own handbook and you gussy it, you know, you clean it up or you make it compliant with whatever state you're in and add federal law and

Oral argument — People v. Webster

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2023

Now, this is a judge who commented that she believed Miguel could be rehabilitated and go on with his life. … But the court, the appellate court must find error and then act.

Oral argument — Eugene Dunston v. Donnie Harrison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2014

And at that point in time, all the officer has done is use a takedown maneuver, period. … Now he's coming to court and saying, no, I contend that Officer Douglas did violate my constitutional rights, that he did act outside the lawful duties of that office.

Oral argument — Open Justice Baltimore v. Baltimore City Law Department

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2024

First, plaintiffs pled a plausible retaliation claim as our clients previously aired criticism of defendants, so it is plausible that defendants delayed and obstructed requests because of previous criticism … I'd like to point out that— In the Monell proposition, there's no right to—there's no mandate or right of access to government information or sources within the government's control, period.

Oral argument — GLENBROOK PREV. v. TAHOE REGIONAL PLAN.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2005

We went back to the trial court, and the magistrate, the magistrate judge, acknowledged that we had a right to discovery, but that kept periodically being postponed by motions or other matters brought … TRPA kept telling the court that this was a speculative subject, that it was not ripe, and the court even referred to our comments on the Hamlet Meadow area as attorney puffing.

Oral argument — Tauno Waidla v. Ron Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2024

And I would say that for the time period, it was extremely heinous. … And reinitiation can be an act.

Oral argument — United States v. Sa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2018

She issued a decision in October of 2015, and in that period of time, the Speed of Trial Act started running again after the 30-day time period in 3161H1H, and it expired before the decision on those motions … The motions were being made, so everything was kind of up in the air at that point. Is that right? Yes. She adjourned the trial date sine D because the motions were pending.

Oral argument — SEALED Gilbert v. Kent County Memorial Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2023

But the board, and I quote from one of the comments made, it's in the minutes, they didn't want to kick the can down the road for some other hospital to deal with. … It doesn't mean I came up with a clean response for you, but I'm not sure what I came up with. I'm not sure what the court would declare.

Oral argument — Ramsay Scarlett & Company v. DOWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2015

There's no doubt that there's an elephant worth of exposure under the State Act, and that the exposures are lesser under the Longshore Act. … Because one of the jobs that the employer had was to monitor the air, to monitor the employees periodically, to follow these regulations, to give the employees some safety information and training.

Oral argument — United States v. Daniel Flint

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2021

He has no violation of law to act to do so. And fourth, when he enters, he has to have the intent to obey the security procedures. … It was the air marshal and one other officer. There were several other law enforcement folks waiting in the terminal.

Oral argument — Craig Milhouse v. Travelers Commercial Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2016

Unlike the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Rules Enabling Act is deemed an act of Congress. … It is not, I mean, excuse me, the Federal Rules of Evidence are deemed an act of Congress and are not subject to the Rules Enabling Act.

Oral argument — Citizens for Balanced Use v. Kathleen McAllister

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2011

Summarize for me, if you can, why that was air, what the district court did, and as concisely as possible. … Citizens believes that the integrity of NEPA was compromised in this case when the Forest Service didn't adequately address their concerns as communicated in their comments and those of Dr.

Oral argument — Julie Su v. Medical Staffing of America, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2024

across multiple states across a seven-year period. … It will be an increase, but it won't be a clean doubling.