Documents

Oral argument — Stiegman v. Stiegman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2019

At the time she married him, he was based in England at an Air Force base. Shortly thereafter, he had been based in the Crestview, Florida area. … So they were, they hadn't spent a lot of time together over the three years period of time.

Oral argument — United States v. Knox

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2022

I still don't think he prevails on plain air review given that there's no authority saying that anywhere and it's not a direct application of Nassir given the difference in the language of the provisions … I hope that the Senate will act on that. And so hopefully sometime this year we'll have a Sentencing Commission. And there's no doubt that this will be one of the first issues.

Oral argument — Sturdivant v. Fine

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2021

My client sent a text message to another individual who's a friend of hers and a friend of the other individual who did not make the team, and in the context of that text message made comments that were … Vine acted under apparent authority.

Oral argument — CITY SOLUTIONS v. CLEAR CHANNEL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2004

And God knows where this $800,000 number came out of the air. So we think it's very clear, Your Honor, that there's nothing in the record to support any. Well, here's where it might have come from. … Counsel, I want you to comment on the Boyd case, the California case. Bevilacqua? Yes.

Oral argument — Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2019

If they were writing on a clean slate, going prospectively, that they may well release this information, they said they likely would. … In this context is to where there has been 40 years of notice and comment regulations by a high, high level of government sign-off, right?

Oral argument — Media Matters for America v. Warren Paxton, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2024

The act is not the issuance of the CID? … absent some compulsory act by the government, that is self inflicted. There is no compulsory act for a lot of the reasons that judge Edwards was describing.

Oral argument — Cervantes v. Hall

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2006

Well, as the famous legal commentator Bernard Witkin in California once said, an intermediate appellate court may be bound, but it's not gagged. … And what we have here is Boyd, which is pretty clear, and one of Your Honors has cited Boyd and Tye, and that case basically says that because the law on this issue is so up in the air, as the Court can

Oral argument — United States v. Bagley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2026

And then after that, you continued to engage in gun trafficking over a prolonged period of time. You expressed in text messages that you knew what you were doing was wrong. … on pretrial release, which was, I think indisputably, an excellent record on pretrial release, but the court's interpretation of that record was, well, he's just smart enough to know to keep his nose clean

Oral argument — North American Derivatives Exchange, Inc. v. State of Nevada

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2026

That is, it's deemed approved after the passage of a certain time period unless they step in and take action. When that time period passes, it's legally deemed to be approved. … Off the top of my head, I believe the initial comment period was either 30 or 45 days. I think it's 45 days. And then we review comments and move from here.

Oral argument — Wilson v. Cityof PA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

In that case, the plaintiff's lawyer made representations repeatedly to the client and to the court that there were various cleanings that would be filed. It wasn't done. … Could you comment on the propriety of that dismissal? Yes. Your Honor commented about the Poulos factors.

Oral argument — City of Martinez v. New Hampshire

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2005

That's just open air. Is it sort of like a restaurant on poles? That's my understanding, Your Honor. So there isn't underneath it a basement area that you can store things? Correct. … So you're saying, well, it's wrongful entry, eviction or wrongful entry, period, because nothing short of trespass will ever amount to coverage under this case. So it eliminates. It also treats.

Oral argument — United States v. Morgan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2026

So if the district court didn't, you know, give a great reasoning on the 403 ruling, or even if it was just really perfunctory, is that subject to harmless air review? … Just period. Couldn't the district court look at that in a pretrial motion and say, wow, I'm looking at this and under the statute.

Oral argument — 22-2368_USA v. Perrin_Montgomery

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2024

It does not contradict the Pennsylvania wire tap act. … Unless the panel has any, that wasn't a question, more of a comment than a question. Uh, I, we would ask the court to affirm. Thank you. Thank you.

Oral argument — People v. Wallace

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019

Charles Wallace has always had those rights, and when he invoked them during the Miranda Act, they should have been respected. … But in questioning whether or not the file was suppressed in the first place, no, because that question mark is in the air and it could have been dispositive of this case.

Oral argument — Mumtaz Hussaini v. Loretta Lynch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2016

There is one issue in this case, and that's the agency acted well within its discretion when it denied petitioners' motion for a continuance of their removal proceedings to await relief that would not … It states that they are not eligible to adjust if the person has worked in the United States unlawfully or has stayed here in a period of unlawful presence or without valid status.

Oral argument — Cantonv.KMARTCorp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2011

You were not, you were precluded because you never got to the jury, period. Yes, sir, I'm sorry, yes. So on constructive notice, I just have one question. I don't know whether this is in the record. … excuse me, granting summary judgment to . . . but in this case, it essentially said that, following Huey, that it's important to know who the employer is and whether or not, therefore, this person was acting

Oral argument — United States v. Maurice Sayles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2014

Sanders, good morning and thank you for your service of the Criminal Justice Act. The court always appreciates that. Good morning. You're welcome. May it please the court. … Again, it's hard to argue from clean hands here because I made a mistake. You would agree it's a material breach. I do agree. Well, again, I don't want to concede something that I'm not sure about.

Oral argument — United States v. Chaney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2024

There you were dealing with the issue of whether an air gun qualifies as a firearm under Texas law, and even though the defendant in Boston had been prosecuted for use of an air gun, the court said the … appellate court really didn't decide as a matter of law that an air gun qualified as a firearm under Texas statute.

Oral argument — Pontiac Flying Services v. Schiffer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2010

They cleaned up some allegations in the complaint. … You are reposing your trust and confidence in them to act on your behalf and here acting on their behalf was putting our trust in you to make this bid to get the contract which we can perform in the same

Oral argument — Akeem Washington v. Shannon Rivera

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2018

That is, quite frankly, the court may be not writing with a clean slate, but a slate that's not very, there's not very much chalk on it. … well be acting on behalf of the state.