Documents

Oral argument — Remington v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2015

It was going after what may have been during a period of great building addressed to a particular concern. How is it, and is there any explanation for why it expanded beyond the construction trades? … Congress wanted to have a national uniform standard that was the most efficient standard possible to generate free flow and inexpensive movement of goods both by air and on land.

Oral argument — FULBRIGHT v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2012

Irwin was a Civil Rights Act case, also not a case involving Section 2501. … Now, granted, if Congress doesn't act, typically they're okay with whatever that prior legal decision was.

Oral argument — DW Industries v.Dentsply Int. Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2006

They receive both royalty reports and payments on a periodic basis. Why isn't their lawsuit asking for a specific performance of the accounting term exempt from the arbitration? … trademark violations, violation of the Arizona Trade Secrets Act, tortious interference.

Oral argument — Mockbee v. The Austin Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2011

What Justice Cardozo said in that case is that there can't be negligence in the air. There has to be something that ties one to another in creating a tortious linkage, a tortious act. … What I would like to do is to conclude with two comments.

Oral argument — United States v. Aguilar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2008

Those are my comments about that. … Well, I do think that because it's reviewed for plein air and because there's that concession that this is probably not the appropriate case to reach a further nuanced point in that area.

Oral argument — Judith Cole v. Keystone RV Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2022

It said if you're going to do something like live in these things for a long period of time, you have to do certain things to take precautionary steps. … Air out your RV and whatnot, and his response to that was no amount of airing out is going to change the problem if there's a real incursion of gallons of water coming in from a storm.

Oral argument — CITY SOLUTIONS v. CLEAR CHANNEL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2004

And God knows where this $800,000 number came out of the air. So we think it's very clear, Your Honor, that there's nothing in the record to support any. Well, here's where it might have come from. … Counsel, I want you to comment on the Boyd case, the California case. Bevilacqua? Yes.

Oral argument — Karen Stromberg v. Qualcomm Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2019

It would be mooted out even as to the Cartwright Act? … Why would California choose to apply the Cartwright Act rather than the law where the final act occurred?

Oral argument — United States v. Damion Faulkner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2018

of time and then possessed at the end of that period and in our case what we have is receipt of child pornography that occurred over about an eight-month period and then two months later he also possessed … for the counts not to prove In order to do a crime you normally have to have you know an Anglo-American criminal jurisprudence you normally have to have intent and actus reus that is facts concerning acts

Oral argument — Common Cause Rhode Island v. RI Republic Party

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2020

It can't give way unless the legislature acts. It can't give way unless the governor acts. … That's one of the reasons we have courts and one of the reasons we have cleanings like this is legislatures don't always act the way they should. Executives don't always act the way they should.

Oral argument — Curtin Maritime Corp. v. Santa Catalina Island Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2019

And wasn't the competition foreclosed for that 50 year period? No, because there were not there before then, there were not two shippers willing and licensed to serve the island. But now there are. … They can't do it by air, and there's no other ports. So if you want to participate in the Catalina freight shipping market, that's the only game in town.

Oral argument — 22-2368_USA v. Perrin_Montgomery

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2024

It does not contradict the Pennsylvania wire tap act. … Unless the panel has any, that wasn't a question, more of a comment than a question. Uh, I, we would ask the court to affirm. Thank you. Thank you.

Oral argument — Cervantes v. Hall

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2006

Well, as the famous legal commentator Bernard Witkin in California once said, an intermediate appellate court may be bound, but it's not gagged. … And what we have here is Boyd, which is pretty clear, and one of Your Honors has cited Boyd and Tye, and that case basically says that because the law on this issue is so up in the air, as the Court can

Oral argument — United States v. Giwa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008

There was a housekeeper who had come in on October 8th, and the box was there and then cleaned up. … The police and the law enforcement agents were acting on the law at the time.

Oral argument — United States v. Leonardo Magallon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2020

And it was a very short period of time. On the second or the third contact that Officer Smith is asking questions until he Mirandizes him. … And other people testified it was because of his having a clean driving record, correct? That's correct. You heard me, that other people testified.

Oral argument — Jeremy Rocha v. County of Tulare

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2015

I certainly concede there's a possibility that it was a clean search, but we won't know that. What are your Federal constitutional claims? … It was under the Bain Act and similar. But that's also – the Bain Act also encompasses the State constitution as well as the Federal constitution, correct? Yes, for civil rights violations.

Oral argument — Paramjeet Malhotra v. Robert Steinberg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2014

I could have called the Postal Service and said, you know, I don't think that guy's clean. I think he's been doping, and he's been presenting false claims to the Postal Service. … My last comment just quickly on the cost issue, because I know it's before the court, is that the district court's ruling on that was, again, based upon its hearing of a full day of testimony.

Oral argument — J.M.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2023

And then, counsel, I was going to ask, though, however, with regard to and focus a little bit on your comment regarding two parents. … The Article 7 of the Parentage Act really governs the issue of parentage in this case. Isn't that correct?

Oral argument — Kyler Moje v. Federal Hockey League LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2015

So with respect to complicity of the client, that's up in the air. There was no... And they had every opportunity to say that, you know, he wasn't complicit and he knew nothing about this. … So he knew, and he knew for an extended period of time.

Oral argument — National Women's Law Center v. OMB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2020

So the district court said it can continue to be live for an additional period. Is that also moot? … Because the government's position will obviously be it's going to move this OMB period of approval has expired.