Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.15s
Oral argument — Timothy Capps v. Newmark Southern Region, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2022
Another issue would be an inability to cure within the cure period. For example, this contract provided 30 days of cure. … Judge Floyd, you made a comment that I'll close with. And that is that this is a bench trial in front of an experienced district court judge. She was the sole fact finder.
41 min of audioOral argument — EEOC v. Village at Hamilton Pointe LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2023
I don't know how you can get out from under plain-air review. … What an employer has to do is act reasonably to prevent and to correct. So there are a bunch of different ways that could happen. As Cheney said, Cheney listed a few of the possibilities.
36 min of audioOral argument — Neil Grenning v. Maggie Miller-Stout
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2018
here, giving Seattle the worst air quality in the world the last week. … Could you just clarify that though, because the testimony at 71, which is that it's between three and six or 6.5, relates to which period?
32 min of audioOral argument — Allstate Insurance Company v. Fougere
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2023
Cutler's comments, that because they personally collected that information, it's their information. … Now, there was this comment that was just made about, well, no, they're independent agents.
26 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2012
that five-year period. … He comes up with this idea, this test of arbitrariness, out of, I submit, thin air. He invented it.
53 min of audioOral argument — Cope v. Coleman County
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024
What we have here is is we have four people acting at the same time, all doing the same thing, all not calling 911. … Would it be a policy that 911 has to be called within a specific period of time? What's the constitutional minimum, in your view?
32 min of audioOral argument — Nicholas Wade v. Solomon Daniels
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2020
And I cleaned that language up a little bit. Yes, sir. I definitely recognize that. … And if it was use of force, it was definitely de minimis because there was no period of permanent injury resulting from that. Thank you, Your Honors.
33 min of audioOral argument — Studio Transportation Drivers v. Entertainment Media Specialist
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2011
First, they admit they were writing from a clean slate, so they really had no published decisions to follow. So what? You still have to convince us that the Supreme Court wouldn't follow it. … I believe it's three days, or it's a brief period of time. I believe it's three days or seven days. With the maximum amount of money the payroll company can advance? There is no maximum amount.
34 min of audioOral argument — Peter-Pelican v. Mariana Islands
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2005
When you started the trial, my understanding is that that whole issue was up in the air. … So after the trial and for a period of some months afterwards, there were partial payments made upon this civil service situation.
42 min of audioOral argument — Leydi Rios-Valladares v. Merrick Garland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2021
So in other words, yes, they may have made comments about their their politics. … They were clearly told by the fire department that it was an act of crime and they didn't ask.
36 min of audioOral argument — People v. Reed
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2014
As far as the argument that it was kind of up in the air whether or not a bench death penalty eligibility, the Bailey court said, no, that was never up in the air. … there was a strong probability that he was committing acts that would lead to death or great bodily harm.
46 min of audioOral argument — Basim Haddad v. Randall S Miller Assoc PC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 30, 2014
Your Honors, this is a case brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. … For purposes of this case, I think we can assume that this act doesn't really care about how the debt came about. And this act doesn't really care about how the debt is treated vis-a-vis the debtor.
26 min of audioOral argument — United States v. L
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2018
Joe supplied the air. Joe supplied the bike. And in this particular analogy, and again, focusing on our case, this bike couldn't go without Mr. DeSilva. Period. … under the False Claims Act, aside from anything that might happen with a relator.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. David Piper, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018
And during that period of incarceration, as we understand the record, that's when this conversation with Castle occurred that Eli overheard. So it was in February, March. I guess so. … That is totally inconsistent with this notion of Piper being picked out of thin air. That's just a harmlessness argument.
40 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Garcia
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2021
Yes, because that's closer to the Nixon time period of a year where this court heavily weighed the third factor against the defendant. And I'd like to reserve the final 39 seconds. … That was, again, something that applied clear air. There just is not a situation where a district court has said, this is not complex.
37 min of audioOral argument — R.J. REYNOLDS v. BONTA
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2004
No, you cannot use excise taxes for this purpose, period. That's your position. To engage in ñ it depends on how widely the excise tax was imposed. … Karen Leaf, appearing on behalf of Appellee's, the California Department of Health Services, and the acting director of its Tobacco Control Section.
41 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2020
So what the trial court did was take alphabet, I'm sorry, mathematical soup, throw it up in the air, and come to a figure that provides Mr. … I would like to tell you, I'm going to keep my comments to 4% of the allocated time. Accordingly, I don't think I can do that because I'd have to stop like right now.
46 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Isaac Martinez-Chavez
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2026
This court has recognized that the liar comment is problematic. … So are you saying that's your position that your hands are clean in any circumstances in terms of that being not preserved?
47 min of audioOral argument — Brent Adkins v. Marathon Petroleum Co LP
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2024
The Coast Guard, for good reason, says if you're going to be working on a tanker barge, you have to have respiratory findings of above 75% of forced vital capacity, the ability to blow the air out in one … Nothing remarkable was noted in his periodic history. That's false. What was remarkable was that his pulmonary function was below 70. It was around 67 or 68 at that time.
34 min of audioOral argument — Holsapple v. State of Illinois Human Rights Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2019
And so he had a temporary duty assignment with air operations. And what was nice about that for him was that they maintained the same rank and same salary. … And so I don't think there's any dispute under Illinois law and federal law if it's a pattern, hostile work environment, then the last act, the last act, becomes the time where the 180 days begins to run
32 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.