Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

1,016 results

0.12s

  • Oral argument — 19-1752_Advanced Fluid Systems Inc v. Huber

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020

    And knew they had them over an extended period of time because they were working with them and using them, right? That's correct. So your argument isn't that they didn't possess them. … So this was a fundamental structure of the Uniform Act, what became codified in the formal comment that we have now in 5304 of PUTSA.

    45 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. v. American National Insurance Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2014

    Mitalika's comment that you failed to disclose that you were going to move or move your operations offshore? The record on that is on a couple of different things. … And, you know, in this case, following a lengthy discovery period, Anneko sought summary judgment on its rescission claim.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Cottillion v. URC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2014

    Or because the IRS specifically says it doesn't comment on ERISA? … Laughlin was reasonable, that he was acting in good faith, including many of the class members, including Ms. Colosimo, who was employed by Mr. Laughlin.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Rabin v. NASDAQ

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

    That word has meaning, doesn't it connect a deceptive act and if you agree with that, what act was deceptive by the trading practices? … How is that a regulatory act by the SEC?

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Swanger v. Warrior Run School District

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2016

    My able colleague came up with a comment to this honorable court that they knew that this young man was involved in targeting, and there's just no evidence of record to support that. … So it's a vastly different circumstance than the LNR case where there were months of molestation alleged in a room where the teacher was present over a long period of time.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 21-1028_21-1029_Malletand Co v. Lacayo

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2021

    Stick with the Defend Trade Secrets Act. The Defend Trade Secret Act says if it's readily ascertainable, then maybe it's not a trade secret. Assume that it's not readily ascertainable. … I'd like you to respond to your adversary's comment with regard to paragraph eight of the findings of fact.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Knapp v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2022

    washington that presentment date will relate back to the filing of the writ which was may sometime in may of 2017 which is within the two-year statute of limitations well um here's what i'd love you to comment … right we're only now we're talking about the westfall act we're only looking at the westfall act you could make the same point looking at the language of the westfall act i'm not disparaging pennsylvania

    107 min of audio
  • Oral argument — INREInsurance Brokerage A

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

    Bashman, let me go back to one of your very initial comments. … He's in the room, so he's hearing your comments now.

    73 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Kurns v. AWChesterton Inc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2010

    Markowitz, who will follow me in the podium, may have some additional comments, but let me address it right now. … No period either. Let me begin, since I think I'm here to mop up, to some degree, Mr.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 19-3102_MZM Construction v. NJ Bldg Laborers

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2020

    If she's signing an agreement and actually Judge McNulty notes this specifically in his comments at oral argument, he says, you know, she understands what a collective bargaining agreement is. … And at the end, uh, by, you know, whether it's bad faith, bad faith, or, uh, you know, a surreptitious act, uh, some sort of absurd construction of events.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Peter Ponzini v. Monroe County

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2019

    How did that result in an outrageous act or an act that would justify punitive damages? Sure. Well, if you look at the testimony that Mr. … Barbaros didn't have the opportunity to be neglected for a long period of time.

    67 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ndungu v. Atty Gen USA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2024

    But why isn't the act of willfully fleeing or eluding a police officer itself turpitudinous? … It directs the BIA to undertake this, the Attorney General to take this, but you haven't mentioned the Attorney General's views in this discussion, except courts and commentators and cases.

    82 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ng v. US Attorney General

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 30, 2020

    I think it's extraordinary measure for the third circuit to instruct the or any circuit court to instruct the board to act in a certain way other than to review the record. … Should there be some sliding scale of sorts, the greater period of time that elapsed, the more the BIA needs to specifically comment on the additional evidence, or should perhaps be the for us to go through

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Joshim Uddin v. Attorney General USA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2017

    But out of the 55 decisions, on the 20 decisions, the BIA itself focused whether the leadership sanctioned this act. … You're acting as though the finding by the IJ and the BIA rests solely on the RAB. But it really doesn't. It was broader than that.

    54 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Royev.Atty Gen USA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2012

    Because this does all spring from the dissenting BIA panelists' comment. I mean, how do we have jurisdiction over that? That's not a final order of removal, is it? … I am hoping that the Department of Homeland Security is going to work with me, since they're allowed to keep him in custody for a certain period of time after this matter is settled.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Green

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2018

    And he filed his claim within a couple of years, within the limitations period. … Does it matter that Justice Sotomayor's comments were in a concurrence, not in a majority opinion?

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. William Valentin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 30, 2023

    We understood that Hobbs Act robbery is broader than the comment, excuse me, than the guideline definition because the guideline requires that to be against another person. … The comment says it is a crime of violence if the underlying thing is a crime of violence. It doesn't say the opposite.

    52 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jaludi v. Citigroup

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2022

    But the logic of a continuing violation is, take a hostile work environment, a classic example, no one individual comment might be actionable. … The only act you've got within this period is the headhunter didn't respond to him. But I don't see a concrete fact that links Citigroup to that headhunter. Well, you're on our time. Yeah, thank you.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Reyes

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

    I don't know if the act – I don't know if it happened. It's in the briefing, but it's not a disposition of it. There was a forfeiture. … Is there any problem from the government's point of view of that theory prevailing that during that period of time that she was trying to depart, she was remaining, of course, during that period of time

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — G-IHoldings v. Reliance

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

    And that's why you get back to the interrelated wrongful acts provision. … I have no comment. But we think in any event, the moose and the snake should be sent back to the District Court. Thank you. Very good. Thanks, General.

    32 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.