Documents

Oral argument — Evelyn Gomez-Villatoro v. Loretta Lynch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2016

Is that claim she's making derivative of her father and brother's religious acts? There are two parts to that, Your Honor. … No, the I.J. did comment on that, I thought. He did comment on that. Are you saying that he didn't comment on that? No, that is in the government's briefs, not in the I.J.'

Oral argument — Denise Wilkins v. Vicki Montgomery

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2014

Under Virginia law, we have the Virginia Tort Claims Act. … I can't comment on that. And I don't think the Attorney General would want me to say anything on that issue. I'm quite positive.

Oral argument — Dmarcian, Inc. v. DMARC Advisor BV

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2026

Yes, Abitron was a Lanham Act decision. … I understand, Your Honor, and we would agree with the Court's concerns and comments.

Oral argument — United States v. Armond Dowdell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2013

Now, I recognize that there are a lot of cases that government counsel cited to which I responded that even have greater periods of time. … The period of time is but a factor among many that the reviewing courts should review.

Oral argument — Robert Gary v. Facebook, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2020

In the record, there is a single piece of evidence, an affidavit submitted by Brian Gill, that attributes an utterly reprehensible racial comment to Mr. Hawkins. Comments. Comments. Plural. … Gary, or was that during a different time period? It was in the same quarter in which Mr. Hamrick had favorable things to say about the plaintiff. That's true. But Mr.

Oral argument — Dawn Flores v. Ethicon, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2014

And during that 40-day period, and I hope I'm answering Judge Duncan's question, too. During that 40-day period, we compiled and marshaled together as much information as we could. … Well, what we have here, Your Honor, is how am I to determine, and this goes to counsel's comments that as to the affirmative versus defensive acts, and we pointed out to the court that we felt that an

Oral argument — US ex rel. Jon H. Oberg v. Pennsylvania Higher Education

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2015

At that point, we had alleged that 30% of Spheer's earnings were made out-of-state in the period 2002 to 2006, which is the record period. … It's acting in the interest of the federal government. During the relevant period, it was acting in the interest of students all over the country, banks all over the country. It's a secondary market.

Oral argument — Coalition for Equity v. Maryland Higher Education

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2018

But beginning in 1968 and periodically thereafter, Maryland has shifted to specific formulas. … Yes, Judge Agee would like to make a final comment.

Oral argument — Richard Kelly v. Altria Client Services, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2026

And the two transactions required different settlement periods to be completed. And Fidelity explained those two periods. They said the cash transaction is shorter, three to five days, if that. … And so, is it possible, as a matter of law, that Fidelity could act as a fiduciary, even if the contractual agreement didn't provide the authority to act as a fiduciary?

Oral argument — Magaly Hernandez v. Fairfax County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2017

One was that he acted inappropriately vis-à-vis his girlfriend's estranged husband because he was trying to find out whether or not he was having an affair. … Could a reasonable jury have thought, you know what, put the period after cease all investigation of Ms.

Oral argument — United States v. Sean Ath

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2019

Ath took the package without looking at it, without commenting on the face... He looked at it. … We're looking for some affirmative act, like an intentional act to avoid finding out what is in the package, and I'm just wondering if there was anything like that here.

Oral argument — United States v. Amar Endris

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2016

The Court also required that defendants promptly accept the government's offer to participate in the criminal act. … Here, there's this two-month period where the government offered, had offered the weapon once. And in this two-month period, Mr. Andrus didn't go out and buy a legal firearm.

Oral argument — Helga Cohen v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2020

These flood victims assert that the U.S. government is liable to them under the Federal Tort Claims Act and that the discretionary function exception does not apply. … Unfortunately, there are a lot of documents from that period that weren't able to be located.

Oral argument — Raleigh Wake Citizens Assoc v. Wake County Board of Elections

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2016

The second is the right to be free from racial classifications and redistricting except where required by the Voting Rights Act or other compelling governmental interests narrowly tailored. … And if I know my time is running down, I want to make two quick comments on partisanship because in no way does the evidence demonstrate impermissible levels of partisanship.

Oral argument — Wudi Industrial (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Wai Wong

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2024

So is this, this is an injunction enforcing the Lanham Act? … Now, I would like to comment briefly on irreparable injury that I alluded to before.

Oral argument — United States v. Carl Mann, II

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2025

Could you move on to the Speedy Trial Act? I mean, not the Speedy Trial Act, we were talking about before. Long wait for me. The wiretap issue. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Absolutely. I'm happy to. … Lang's comments. I'm happy to switch to the necessity issue. The underlying affidavit on the face of it, on the terms of how it was granted, was plainly appropriate at that time.

Oral argument — Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Meritain Health, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2026

And then you have these other couple of Ninth Circuit cases that, to me, just seemed like to pull the direct control element not from Inwood but out of thin air. … Did they have knowledge of the act that was occurring? Yes, they had knowledge of the act.

Oral argument — City of Huntington, West Virginia v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2024

For what period of time does this go on? Over a 20-year period, the distributors supplied 80 billion opioid units into Huntington Cabell, a community of about 100,000 people. … He looked at treatises and the law of other states, and the third restatement, Comment G, explains that the common law of public nuisance is an inapt vehicle.

Oral argument — Richard Alvarez v. Xavier Becerra

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2022

And I think in part what we have to look at here, and again, this goes a bit to my earlier comment on what's the process do here. … And Congress often builds in automatic appeal periods if somebody doesn't decide.

Oral argument — Ansberto Gonzalez v. Kenneth Cuccinelli, II

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 27, 2020

And under the Administrative Procedure Act, when an application is presented to the agency, they must act within a reasonable amount of time. … And I see I'm out of time, Your Honor, if I could just comment on that. I think you're hitting the root of the problematic nature of the rule that the agency is pushing for.