Documents

Oral argument — James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2019

But that was Kagan quoting Justice Scalia, so that wasn't his comment on it. … The government wants to buy an air conditioning unit, and it prescribes a certain cooling capacity. But it says nothing about certain safety standards that state law may apply.

Oral argument — Gonzalez v. El Centro Del Barrio

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2026

And I think Judge Bybee, you know, made the same sort of comment that you could write the statute more clearly. … And it's not just are they a deemed entity in that time period. If the, if Congress wanted it to be are they deemed during the time period when the acts happen, they would have written it that way.

Oral argument — Texas Brine Company, L.L.C. v. Amer Arbitration As

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2019

for that particular time period. … And those cases were about extending deadlines when a party took an action to frustrate a time period created by Congress for the doing of an act. This is the opposite. There's no such time period.

Oral argument — Megalomedia v. Philadelphia Indemnity

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2025

This exclusion, and the judge correctly noted this in the findings of the act. You lost me. … They're buying it through a program that is run by the Discovery Channel where the show's aired. And the Discovery Channel forces them to buy this specific coverage.

Oral argument — Lifshen v. 20/20 Accounting Solutions

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2021

If he gets called by the insurer as to his policy and they're saying it's you're in a grace period and he hasn't quite noticed, well, they might the other 2020 saying they paid it. … I'm merely suggesting, of course, that 2020 performed the physical act of paying with the practice's money. But there is that evidence, and it's in the appendix.

Oral argument — SEC v. Barton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2025

I'd like to begin, unless the Court has a specific place that it would like me to begin with, responding to some of the comments that Mr. Redney just made. … How do you monitor something without—when you turn away your receivership, it frees people to act, and businessmen are going to act. I guess one of the— I don't know.

Oral argument — United States v. Silva

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2025

The district court did not make any comments to that effect. … It would lead to a larger time period if that's not the time period that you were in the conspiracy.

Oral argument — Virginia Lay v. Singing River Health Sys Fdn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2017

How is all of this admissible, these comments over this period of time? Your Honor, because he's the decision-maker. … I don't understand that to be a defense to the Age Discrimination Act.

Oral argument — Michael Gahagan v. US Citizenship & Img Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2018

Commerce Act. … under the Air Carrier Access Act.

Oral argument — FDIC v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2015

The limitations periods for bringing claims. Now, I'm sure my friends are. You're acting in this context, are you? You're stepping in the shoes of the bank. … Now, the Federal Tort Claims Act cases we think are instructive.

Oral argument — Mark Muller v. Mississippi Power Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2019

comments. … There's an employee comment section. You can comment. He didn't do any of those things. A clear rejection.

Oral argument — Porretto v. City of Galveston

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2024

It would be either a ten-year or six-year period. Ten-year would be if it was . . . Well, that goes well back into . . . except for the short, relatively short period. … But during that period, the trustee was in charge of Pareto Beach, right? Yes, Your Honor. Plus he . . .

Oral argument — Lindsey Hoyt v. Lane Construction Corporati

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2019

Well, then, if that were true, every— Well, it's actually a different time period, right? In state courts, you can't file a no-evidence motion until the person's had time for discovery. … But if the plaintiff agrees to voluntarily sever it out, that that is a voluntary act. That did not happen here. That is not involved. Counsel was also asked about stipulate.

Oral argument — Nicole Wittmer v. Phillips 66 Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2019

That comment came only afterwards in response to the decision. … So, now we have a fat question, and in this context, all inferences need to be made in favor of my comment.

Oral argument — City of Schertz v. AGRI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2021

I want to start by Making a comment on the Article Three jurisdiction. I agree with Ms. … Let me just take the false claim act statute. The issue of the word the and that instance is it related to a United States official and because it was false claims act.

Oral argument — United States v. Hankton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2022

It doesn't appear in the overt acts. It doesn't appear, they didn't bring this to the grand jury at all. … I would have noticed when I started not getting air. I'd like to address the erroneous finding of, the erroneous denial of funding for neuropsychological exam, and then if there's time severance.

Oral argument — Ayala Chapa v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2022

The two regulations were proposed under different notice and comment, or different rulemaking. … In fact, the temporary board member was not subject to notice and comment because it was an internal rule.

Oral argument — Julia Duenas v. TDCJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2019

And there's no indication that during that 30-day period, TDCJ did anything else to separate Ms. Duenas from her harasser. … Duenas' argument is that Warden Aminette had made some comment that should impute knowledge on TDCJ. And that testimony about Warden Aminette's comments are on the record on page 287 and 294.

Oral argument — United States v. Lewis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2025

The time period that she was with Mr. Lewis overlapped with the time period that those other witnesses were with Mr. Lewis, and the investigator, like I said, was the main investigator on this case. … They were also testifying about periods and memories that had happened about a decade before. So Taylor Armentor, the witness that I mentioned, was testifying about a period from 2014 to 2015.

Oral argument — Bakane v. Jaddou

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2024

There is no regulation that the Bacanes have pointed to that says that USCIS has a discrete duty to act within a particular period of time, and that's what's required for your unlawful withholding claim … They identified certain regulations for USCIS that relate to notice, but those regulations don't require USCIS to act within a particular period of time or at all.