Documents

Oral argument — Seneca Foods Corp. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2026

This was in a comment, right, in response or the agency's response to comments? Yes, yes. But in the way that the agency went about deciding kind of objections, it applied it in exactly that way. … I mean, one of the initial arguments he made is that Commerce is not acting consistently in its application of this so-called rule.

Oral argument — BillJCo, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2025

So what we submitted was evidence from our expert that said in a PicoNet, you have a master which acts as basically a hub for communications. … I understand there was a period of discussion, an extended period of discussion with Apple, correct? This may not apply to this case, but I'd like to hear your view.

Oral argument — MINESEN CO v. ARMY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2011

Another is the ongoing period during which the quantum proceedings are going, which will come to an end at some point. And the third period is the period after the end of the quantum proceeding. … On the question of the Slattery decision, I'd like for you to just briefly comment on your argument, in your briefs anyway, that the Slattery decision applies both to the Tucker Act and to the CDA.

Oral argument — PPG Industries, Inc. v. Valspar Sourcing, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2016

Because there's no injury in fact in this case, and I'll certainly concede— Even with the fact that your client has sued PPG based on related patents for a coating for an air interior of a can? … Under the Administrative Procedures Act, the board has an obligation to explain what they're basing their decision on.

Oral argument — Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2015

First, I'd like to respond to some of counsel's comments about claim construction. … But acts are never asked in the district court or in this court that collect be construed to mean gathered together.

Oral argument — Barrett v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2006

The Veterans Administration and the Secretary of the Veterans Administration acts pursuant to statute. … The decision written by Judge Mayer in Barrett I specifically commented on the rich assets of the Secretary in terms of psychiatrists and other medical professionals.

Oral argument — Weeks Marine v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2009

But here, given that environmental windows compress the time period for dredging in much of the region, for example, hopper dredges are limited to a December through March, a four-month time period, given … Final comment, Mr. Payne?

Oral argument — TNS Media Research, LLC v. TiVo Research And Analytics

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2015

So I guess I have two comments I'd like to make about that. … But why can't you tell whether something's worked if you know that an ad airs in a given quarter and that in a given quarter there were increased purchases of the particular product?

Oral argument — Spansion Inc v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2010

The commission did not act as an expert. Rather, the commission based its finding of infringement solely on what was presented in the record after considering the record as a whole. … Imagine a semiconductor package with little solder balls on it floating in the air.

Oral argument — Mohsenzadeh v. Lee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2015

Example 13, which says, Further prosecution via a continuing application in which case the period set forth in 1.703 shall not include any period prior to the actual filing date of the application that … This is a belt and suspenders that the comments at the time said, everybody knows this doesn't count at all. And PTO said, yes, we're just putting this in here to remind applicants.

Oral argument — Timken Company v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2015

When Commerce is making a discretionary decision on a case-by-case basis, it need only act within its statutory authority and does not need to provide a reasoned analysis. … The Joint Appendix contains our post-preliminary comments in their entirety, in fact. And so I've brought up only one volume here, but they contain the same arguments.

Oral argument — King v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2016

This is an unusual case regarding nonpayment of overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act. … And this case is about their claim for back pay and associated relief in the interim period. The only thing that changed in the interim period was their job grade.

Oral argument — Kandel v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2026

The lump sum act itself, however, said the employee, when he leaves, is to be paid the amount for unused vacation that he would have received had he continued to work for that period of time. … Your interim rebuttal time was just Judge Bryson has a further comment. Thank you, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Pucilowski v. Justice

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2009

Well, that's when you're called to act. That's true. Okay. … The last day was two days in pay period 16 in 1998.

Oral argument — Proctor & Gamble v. Kraft Foods

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2008

Rooklage made a comment during his presentation to Your Honors, which I think is important to correct. … Everything is moved now that she's stayed in the act. She went to a preliminary injunction motion. Well, that's what stays do. Stays put a state of disrepair. But what happens on that time period?

Oral argument — National American v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2007

Now the ICW comment, and I'm going to refer to it as a comment, I think is clearly dicta. There are seven decisions, I believe, in the Court of Federal Claims that characterize it as dicta. … That comment, as you mentioned, is not even attributed to Blue Fox.

Oral argument — Papierfabrik August Koehler SE v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2018

This is simply a mathematical error that Kohler was trying to bring to Commerce's attention when Commerce reopened the record and specifically invited comments on this topic. … the tail end of period of review 2.

Oral argument — Biotech Ind v. District of Columbia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2007

Hatch-Watson extends the patent period during the period of FDA approval consideration of new drugs up to a five-year period. … Could you comment just for 10 seconds on the question that Judge Gayarza raised at the outset, which is why are you here?

Oral argument — Stillwell v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2015

Please proceed to the podium so that your comment can be recorded. I noticed last week that one page was missing from the appendix. … However, my gosh, if you allow that kind of testimony, as I say, you're simply undermining the Vaccine Injury Act in establishing a primacasia case.

Oral argument — BASR Partnership v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2014

But the point is that in a case in which, for example, take, for example, the pre-TEFRA case, the taxpayer, that BASR brings up in its briefing comment, in which one taxpayer prepares the partnership returns … Going back to the 1918 Act, as the court knows, Congress enacted the predecessor to both the fraud penalty and the exception to the normal assessment period in the 1918 Act exactly one subsection apart