Documents

Oral argument — Zaffiri v. Pontiac RV Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2012

Well, they sold them air. What does they have to know? Well, we didn't know. We sold them air. It was nothing. But we sold it to them. … You can't sell air normally without, you know, you didn't prove a fraudulent intent on our behalf. Is that required?

Oral argument — In re: Marriage of Geiser

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2021

This is even contrary to his website advertising, which we presented to the court as evidence for his latest company, Clean Cut Painting and have proudly grown the company. … In fact, in the DeFatta case, the court went back 10 years and was found to have acted properly.

Oral argument — People v. Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2014

So the court comments that the plea that was presented was an open plea. They're not disingenuous. … Because even an erroneous ruling or an erroneous act by a judge does not by itself demonstrate prejudice or bias.

Oral argument — Estes v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2013

what was, was there an air conditioned room, and there's no way this stroke could have occurred. … So every time an employer chews out an employee, we've got potential case under the act. No, it has to be greater stress than the general public.

Oral argument — People v. Battle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2023

Beginning with the 1st issue, the court aired and allowing Mr battle to represent himself. … However, where there is no air, there cannot be plain air, and this court should affirm defendant's convictions on issue one. People also proved defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Oral argument — People v. Barnes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2012

Barnes' second claim of error is that the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did not act in self-defense. … Were shots fired in the air? Did they hit the house? It would seem that they did hit the house. They did hit the house.

Oral argument — People v. Ealy

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2019

And it was a shot in the air. Multiple shots. Okay. … You have an intent, a shared intent, to commit some criminal act in retaliation.

Oral argument — Stein v. Krislov

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2013

motion because the plaintiff did not meet that burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the cpa did not immunize mr krisloff's conduct that was aired for multiple reasons the first i think … that's in keeping with illinois public policy at all that's why these absolute one question with regards to the issue of meritless uh and it hasn't been addressed um there's an allegation that the libel comments

Oral argument — United Gilsonite Laboratories v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2011

Which are both bringing this under the purview of the act. Yes. Okay. … Bergman did not have sarcoidosis before December the 19th or around that time period of 1996.

Oral argument — Fraley v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2025

Zucke asking the question, if you compare how you were at those two different periods, you certainly were any worse. True. … Petitioner testified he's currently working at Amazon Air. He's stacking boxes, airport containers onto rollers so he can stack them.

Oral argument — People v. King

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2019

The second basis is that he acted as his own counsel. … So this did give counsel some, perhaps, leverage if there was a clean negotiation to go on. But the overriding concern here is that he represented himself.

Oral argument — Watkins v. Ingalls Memorial Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2018

And whether it's filing a lawsuit or feeding themselves and cleaning themselves. … Also in federal court, the question of tolling is an open question as to whether a mental incapacity may toll the limitations period in the Federal Courts Claims Act.

Oral argument — The Maryott Group, Inc. v. DeKalb County Public Building Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 23, 2013

And it was tried before Judge Carterman over a period of several months. He heard all of this testimony. He saw all of the documents. … And, you know, there was comment made with regard to not finishing the work.

Oral argument — People v. Sanchez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2019

So he is performing these tasks during that interim period. … If you've got that, you don't need a free air sniff. A free air sniff is lawful because it doesn't reveal the presence of anything anyone has a right to possess.

Oral argument — Estes v. Chew

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2010

The trial report aired in finding that Post Department Store owed no duty to the appellant, Mrs. … And actually, Judge O'Malley made some comments, and it's in the record on appeal, wherein he noted his distaste for police chases.

Oral argument — People v. Larke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2018

Next, the trial court aired and did not answer the jury's question about the effect of a deadlocked jury on the verdict. … But in Watkins, they found no period of trial judgment in his discretion. I ask that you follow your decision in Watkins and find that there was no period here.

Oral argument — Kurtz v. 630 N. State Parkway Condominium

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2012

So they didn't pay that for a long period of time? That's correct. There was some peripheral disputes and it didn't work out. … So in terms of periods of time that we're dealing with, there was a period of time of approximately two months or something like that when a sum of $10,000 or so was due in owing.

Oral argument — Midland Funding LLC v. Hilliker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2016

So to go to the comments of other sources, the comment says, what are our sources? It lists various types of collateral benefits that are covered by the rule. Number one is insurance policies. … First, that was a Dram Shop Act case. I think then it was called the Liquor Control Act, but I believe now it's referred to as the Dram Shop Act.

Oral argument — Bielfeldt v. KPMG

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2011

He acts as a merchant, and those are words again coming from the cases, and is paid for the services of a merchant, seeking customers who will buy those securities at a price in excess of cost. … One who trades frequently as opposed to one who would hold for purposes of investment for a lengthy period of time.

Oral argument — In Interest of A.P.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2013

Phelps admitted that during the first nine-month period following the adjudication of neglect or abuse, she didn't make reasonable progress. … Obviously you're going to act out. Obviously you're going to have problems. And it could even result in a slide in her grades.