Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.87s
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 25, 1997
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included the San … On November 15, 1990, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 were enacted. Pub. L. 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
62 FR 44909Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Operating Permits Program; State of Kansas
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 8, 2008
EPA's review of the material submitted indicates the state has amended the air quality rules in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … EPA's review of the material submitted indicates the state has amended the air quality rules in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act.
73 FR 7468Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 17, 2001
EPA notes that it took this view with respect to the general RFP requirement of section 172(c)(2) in the General Preamble for the Interpretation of title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (57 FR … quality meets federal requirements, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.
66 FR 27483Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 27, 1999
The plan was submitted to fulfill requirements of the Clean Air Act (the Act). … The rule affects only one State, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. C.
64 FR 57781Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 2, 2003
In reviewing 111(d)/129 plan submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
68 FR 48Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Revisions to the Tennessee State Implementation Plan
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 22, 1998
The State of Tennessee must make this rule change to gain approval of Tennessee's VOC regulations to meet requirements under Section 182(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act. … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
63 FR 70663Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 11, 2006
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received comments from Jennifer L. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
71 FR 71486Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Wyoming; Revisions to SO2 Ambient Standards
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 31, 2015
This action is being taken in accordance with section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. II.
80 FR 45607Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 17, 2005
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). DATES: This final rule is effective on September 16, 2005. … In the April 30, 2004, final rule, EPA responded to comments received during the comment period for this final rule.
70 FR 48287Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 28, 2000
The State submitted this portion of the implementation plan to satisfy Clean Air Act (the Act) requirements for adoption of rules for the application of reasonably available control technology (RACT) for … Air Act.
65 FR 24875Environmental Protection AgencyRelease of Integrated Review Plan for the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Federal Register · Notice · Aug 22, 2019
Information Specific to This Document Two sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) govern the establishment and revision of the NAAQS. … Section 109(d)(1) of the Act requires periodic review and, if appropriate, revision of existing air quality criteria.
84 FR 43806Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Oct 22, 2003
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7409) as an independent scientific advisory committee, in part to provide advice, information and recommendations on the scientific and technical aspects of issues related to … Section 109(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that EPA carry out a periodic review and revision, where appropriate, of the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for “criteria” air pollutants such
68 FR 60363Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 8, 2008
requirements of the Clean Air Act. … Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) requires states to develop air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards
73 FR 58913Environmental Protection AgencyDraft Risk and Exposure Assessment Report for Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 8, 2008
• Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. … SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 108(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator identifies and lists certain pollutants which “cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be
73 FR 58950Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 30, 2002
Final Action EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the SIP because the revisions are consistent with Clean Air Act and EPA regulatory requirements. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 66056Environmental Protection AgencyControl of Air Pollution; Removal and Modification of Obsolete, Superfluous or Burdensome Rules
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 11, 1996
EPA conducted such a review, including rules issued under the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) … the Clean Air Act, has also made clear that the state has broad discretion in constructing attainment plans.
61 FR 16050Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 14, 2017
This action is being taken pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and its implementing regulations. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
82 FR 37819Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Maintenance Plan Revisions; Ohio
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 18, 2005
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” … National Technology Transfer Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
70 FR 13105Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 3, 2005
Concurrently, the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District ( i.e. , “District”) also submitted this same package to EPA to solicit EPA's comments during the public comment period. … During this period, to demonstrate no interference with any applicable NAAQS or requirement of the Clean Air Act under section 110(l), EPA believes it is appropriate to allow states to substitute equivalent
70 FR 53Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 25, 1996
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included the San … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
61 FR 38571Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.