Documents

Oral argument — William Hinesley, III v. Wendy Knight

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2016

Let's air this case out thoroughly because the case is full of reasonable doubt. I have two answers to that, Your Honor. The first is that ex-ante, Mr. … s trial testimony about what ended the sexual act. There's inconsistencies about the duration of the act.

Oral argument — Kroma Makeup UE, LLC v. Boldface Licensing + Branding, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2019

And the Supreme Court's commented on this also with its use of jurisdiction sometimes. And now they've cleaned that up. There's claims processing rules and there's jurisdiction. … But whether or not the Lanham Act gives them a cause of action to pursue it, based upon the contract. Precisely.

Oral argument — Taylor v. LeBlanc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2023

Your Honor, he is not strictly liable, period, right? We have to meet a very strict burden versus Thompson. There needs to be knowledge, and we showed knowledge. … It is very clean and very clear with regard to exactly what happened here. And again, those issues could have been easily addressed in the manual. And Mr.

Oral argument — D and A Business Investments LLC v. FDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2025

Yes, and I think the toll case itself directly repudiates the government's argument here because that was a Clean Water Act case. … Well, but I would argue, again, I would refer to the toll case, which was a Clean Water Act case, an entirely new statutory scheme. That is not dispositive.

Oral argument — Chartis Property Casualty Co v. Robert Alpert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2015

They specifically rejected this, where you look at the specific act in a vacuum and say if there wasn't a business pursuit for that specific act, it's not they that has been rejected by the Gettle case … In the Weichnick case, the negligent act was cleaning up after the dog when the babysitter was doing it, and they just said that doesn't matter.

Oral argument — United States v. Andrew Flyer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2010

There's actual evidence that there were acts of distribution. … Well, you don't even know unless you proved he bought it all new and clean that he had the images ever. He might have gotten it at the Salvation Army.

Oral argument — American Hospital Association v. Alex Azar, II

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2019

The adjustment, so, you know, there's, of course, Congress isn't just pulling out a thin air. … So, all right, so 9a, periodic review.

Oral argument — The Arc of Iowa v. Kimberly Reynolds

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2024

And maybe I'm looking at this wrong because I'm just here, but the paragraph four is a clean, accurate statement of the law, is it not? … Nothing in Section 280.31 precludes relief under the ADA or Rehabilitation Act if that is required by those laws.

Oral argument — Rick McLellan v. NV Dept of Public Safety

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2019

He's acting, and he testified later he was really just acting or speaking on his own behalf by the time he was having that interview. … And he ultimately came clean on it.

Oral argument — Rosenbaum v. City, County of San Francisco

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2006

And again, that was literally hundreds of times throughout the time period this case was going on, hundreds of times. … Would you like to respond at all to that comment?

Oral argument — City of Metropolis v. Burr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2025

And the motive procedure statute in the Mortgage Foreclosure Act, in that article, it says it applies to any action filed under the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Act. … So giving them the benefit of the doubt, where the Blatches defense really fails, is the short period of time.

Oral argument — City of West Frankfort v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2020

Well, your honor, again, that was the what the circuit court did, and they would have been in an air of doing that, I believe. … I would comment, Mr. Sheehan, that your opponent suffers from the same difficulty because your opponent thinks this is appealable under 301 and 303.

Oral argument — People v. Bowens

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 27, 2010

So we have to go to the plain air rule, and the plain air rule doesn't admit to any prejudice here because how does this hurt him? How does this go to an essential point? … shows that it is a deliberate act.

Oral argument — John Witherow v. Lea Baker

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2020

And that therefore, the correctional officers were acting in the ordinary course of their duties when they screened Witherow's attorney client calls. … Our second member and disposition said the district court may have aired in dismissing with a rose claim, alleging that certain higher level and DLC officials were liable for their conduct in the grievance

Oral argument — S.K. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2005

The second is the six-month waiting period. That's 2675A. … have an open-ended time period.

Oral argument — Jean-Daniel Perkins v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2022

Perkins, over an eight or nine-year period, was suffering from depressive types. … In that interim period, Mr. Spencer filed a motion for a competency evaluation.

Oral argument — Markley v. U.S. Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2022

They did not do anything beyond look at the report and decide whether to act. Is that correct? That is what they had, Your Honor. Okay. All right. … Pretext doesn't exist in the air. It's not pretext plus to say pretext for age discrimination. It's simply pretext. What if Mr.

Oral argument — Studio Transportation Drivers v. Entertainment Media Specialist

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2011

First, they admit they were writing from a clean slate, so they really had no published decisions to follow. So what? You still have to convince us that the Supreme Court wouldn't follow it. … I believe it's three days, or it's a brief period of time. I believe it's three days or seven days. With the maximum amount of money the payroll company can advance? There is no maximum amount.

Oral argument — Cope v. Coleman County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024

What we have here is is we have four people acting at the same time, all doing the same thing, all not calling 911. … Would it be a policy that 911 has to be called within a specific period of time? What's the constitutional minimum, in your view?

Oral argument — Nicholas Wade v. Solomon Daniels

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2020

And I cleaned that language up a little bit. Yes, sir. I definitely recognize that. … And if it was use of force, it was definitely de minimis because there was no period of permanent injury resulting from that. Thank you, Your Honors.