Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.66s
Oral argument — United States v. Bernardo Lloyd
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2016
Clean negotiations have fallen apart, and now he knows. What can I do to defend myself? It's a strategic motion at that point. … All he really did was file a motion to toll the Speedy Trial Act. So I think it speaks volumes.
53 min of audioOral argument — Marionv.TDIInc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2009
The second issue, of course, is the issue of whether harm could have been caused by the alleged acts of Peninsula Bank. … And so it's alleged its wrong was putting money into the company for brief periods.
59 min of audioOral argument — Korea Kumho Petrochemical Co. v. Flexsys America LP
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2010
The Ninth Circuit said that act, that act of injuring that one doctor, was co-equal to competitive injury. … Well, that doesn't give you a clean bill of health for life.
33 min of audioOral argument — Rita Boucher v. AGRI
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2018
That's defined as plants growing in water or in a substrate that is at least periodically deficient in oxygen as a result of excessive water content. Correct. … My understanding of federal law is that if these farms were sold, to be developed as real estate, then there would have to be a separate determination under the Clean Water Act. Okay, thank you.
34 min of audioOral argument — Colon de Mejias v. Malloy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 20, 2019
So there's a plan that is adopted and has to be approved, at least as far as the clean energy fund, by the commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection. … But what they did is in Public Act 17-2 and then 1881, they amended the statutes.
30 min of audioOral argument — Gregory Bolin v. Renee Baker
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2021
Boland was being brought in because other evidence, for example, the video at the video store, the, the sister's comments, Mr. … Why is it focused just on whether or not there's a potentially meritorious claim, period, end of story?
64 min of audioOral argument — Tawanda Hall v. Andrew Meisner
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 20, 2022
I mean, are we covered by the Rules Decision Act here? I mean, I don't even know if that's right. I mean, maybe it is. … You don't exactly have clean hands here, right? Well, Your Honor, the plaintiffs here, most of them were on payment plans.
59 min of audioOral argument — XPO Logistics Worldwide v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2018
They said your experience in air TDEF, so what are you going to do about it? Crowley comes in with 34 new references and it comes in with more information. … Let me point out as well that there was no change to the RFP here, so we aren't in a blue and gold situation or a comment situation.
30 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jason Zucker
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2018
Second, the number 100 speaks of a conspiracy period I have down as a couple different years. I don't recall when within the year, but an extended period of time. … Well, the plea agreement says the government would have evidence that somebody spotted from the air 70 plants.
33 min of audioOral argument — Lebourgeois v. Rebecca Irene Fisheries
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2005
I think common law unfair business practice act does not rise to the same level of protection that these, the 1991 acts, which are broad sweeping that are changing the workplace for the better, that are … We just pick something out of the air and say. Yeah, that is something of an issue at this point.
82 min of audioOral argument — Kasey Roberts v. Gestamp West Virginia, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2022
The infection has under the employer's policies and specifically under 29 CFR 303C of the Family Medical Leave Act. … We didn't rely upon the two-day period, Your Honor.
42 min of audioOral argument — In re Danimer Scientific, Inc. Securities Litigation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2024
Because there's something unique about landfills, distinct from some of these other environments, that the CEO's comment wouldn't apply in the context of landfills. … So editing something, I mean, just like an opinion or a brief is an intentional act. So there's an inference of CANTOR to take from that. And, again, none of these is dispositive.
19 min of audioOral argument — Roberto Martinez v. Union Officine Meccaniche
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2023
Fernando Passoni, who submitted the affidavit, the owner of the company in Italy, came here in April of 2018 after the warranty period had ended. So that informs us, does it not? … If an employer, for example, allows its employee to work on a dangerous machine, one that allegedly didn't have a guard or one that allowed him to clean while the rollers were spinning, that falls within
43 min of audioOral argument — Accuracy in Media v. DOD
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2025
The issue in this Freedom of Information Act lawsuit are two issues. … Given your position, the time period has not passed yet? I don't, it's not my, yes, it's my understanding the time period has not yet passed.
43 min of audioOral argument — Maria Guyton v. Tyson Foods
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2014
As Your Honor pointed out, they didn't make this objection on the Portal Act. And guess why? Because we're the ones who won Reich in the Portal Act. … On the meal period, Judge Jarvie granted a summary judgment on the meal period.
31 min of audioOral argument — Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. v. Seamaster Logistics, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2017
And the District Court also made passing comments to the effect that wire fraud violations had not been shown. … And lastly, one more comment on domestic injury.
39 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ruslan Kirilyuk
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2021
So they were really writing on a clean slate which this court isn't. And the other even if the court were to get to this question of whether Kaiser mandates this decision it really doesn't. … But I mean of the facts here what happened in this case was that Congress in the Identity Theft and Assurance Act authentically the ITADA directed the Commission review and amend both the guidelines and
35 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2003
The public official has an obligation and a duty under the Constitution to act in restraint continually, as long as he sits in that chair. … Clearly, it was a comment that the panel members heard because Chairman Hill made comment about it. And then later on, Mr.
25 min of audioOral argument — Eddie Sierra v. City of Hallandale Beach, Florida
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2020
And there was discrimination because he suffered the almost two-year period of time with not having these websites not accessible. … So they were never shown over the two-year period. Yes, there were some issues regarding the archived videos, right?
31 min of audioOral argument — Salter v. Washington Township
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2004
testified that this person, I can't think of his name at the moment, but this person, every time he came on the floor, this happened every day, would come on the floor and he'd hold his nose and he'd fan the air … Salter made comments to Ms. Farley, complaining about this person making these racial comments that they smelled bad. Ms. Hunter specifically said that she felt it was racially motivated. Ms.
46 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.