Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

THE PROPER JURISDICTIONAL ANALYSIS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT REQUIRES A SIGNIFICANT NEXUS WELL BEYOND THE MOST MINIMAL HYDROLOGICAL CONNECTION. A. Clean Water Act. … Congress responded to that dramatic event by enacting the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387 (“Clean Water Act”).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Borden Ranch Partnership v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

7 (iv) United States Environmental Protection Agency and United States Department of the Army, Memorandum for the Field, “Clean Water Act Section 404 Regulatory Program and Agricultural Activitios … Legislative History of the Clean Water Act of 1977, A Continuation of the Legislative History of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (1978) (“1977 Leg.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

The Bay partners need broad Clean Water Act jurisdiction to improve water quality. … The Bay partners need broad Clean Water Act jurisdiction to protect and_ restore vital wetlands and SAV areas.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 11, 2022

The court of appeals concluded that even if federal common law governed respondents’ claims, the claims did not “arise under” federal law because the Clean Air Act displaced federal common law, and the … To the extent that federal common law would ordinarily apply, the court reasoned, the Clean Air Act displaced it—but did not displace or completely preempt respondents’ state-law claims. Pet.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Air and Liquid Systems Corp., et al., Petitioners v. Roberta G. DeVries, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of John B. DeVries, Deceased, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 16, 2018

Air & Liquid Sys. Corp., 129 A.3d 984 (Md. 2015) ............................................................ 15 McIndoe v. … During these periods the trusts pay no money to claimants.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries, 139 S. Ct. 986 (2019) (No. 17-1104)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019

During that period, the Navy employed approx- imately 4.5 million shipyard workers who potentially could have been exposed to asbestos fibers.” ). '? … During these periods the trusts pay no money to claimants.

Amicus Curiae Brief — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 18, 2020

Since the Court in American Electric Power held that the Clean Air Act displaced the plaintiffs’ federal common law nuisance claim, there was no reason to address, and the Court did not address, whether … EPA . . . this Court held that the 12 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., authorizes federal regulation of emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. . . . they are therefore within

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act regulation” for protection. … The Court applied this class-of- activity analysis to the Clean Water Act in United States v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Nebraska, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2023

Id. at 2609 (citing Utility Air, 573 U.S. at 324; United States Telecom, 855 F.3d at 381). … Utility Air, 573 U.S. at 324.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act regulation” for protection. … The Court applied this class-of- activity analysis to the Clean Water Act in United States v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Philip Morris USA Inc., Petitioner v. Armand Fontaine, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Barbara Ellen Fontaine

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 23, 2026

Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 485 (1996) (cleaned up). … Meat Inspection Act, ERISA, and numerous other statutes.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Education, et al., Petitioners v. Myra Brown, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2023

Id. at 2609 (citing Utility Air, 573 U.S. at 324; United States Telecom, 855 F.3d at 381). … Utility Air, 573 U.S. at 324.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alex Cantero, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Petitioners v. Bank of America, N.A.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 23, 2024

The Airline Deregulation Act preempts state laws “related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier that may provide air transportation.” 49 U.S.C. § 41713(b)(1). … Miscevic, 880 F.3d 927, 931 (7th Cir. 2018) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Communications Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Consumers' Research, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 18, 2025

Sunstein, Is the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 MICH. L. REV. 303 (1999) ........................................ 17 Chad Squitieri, Towards Nondelegation Doctrines, 86 MO. L. … Sunstein, Is the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 MICH. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Carlota Copper Co. v. Friends of Pinto Creek (No. 07-1524)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

. § 122.4(i) prohibits issuance of a “new” discharge permit under the authority of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (“Clean Water Act”), National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES … Howek, The Clean Water Act TMDL Program: Law, Poiicy, amd Implementation 3-4 (2d ed. 2002).

Amicus Curiae Brief — CropLife America v. Baykeeper

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010

The provisions of the Clean Water Act relied on by the court of appeals do not mention pesticides. The only reference in the Act to pesticides is at 33 U.S.C. … FIFRA sets out how that balance is to be struck; the Clean Water Act does not. 9 b.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. Nebraska, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2022

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 125 (2000) (cleaned up). … Air Regulatory Grp. V. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014)).

Amicus Curiae Brief — General Motors Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

EPA, 810 F. 2d 493 (Sth Cir. 1987) STATUTES: Clean Air Act, 42 USCA § 7410 (a) (3) Page 2 INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE Mid-America Legal Foundation ("MALF") is a non-profit Illinois corporation. … Clean Air Act, 42 USCA § 7410 (a) (3) (A). This is the most logical result, in light of the Page 5 statutory scheme which requires swift action by all concerned.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (No. 08-937)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

They apply the maxim requiring clean hands only where some unconscionable act of one coming for relief has immediate and necessary relation to the equity that he seeks in respect of the matter in litigation … Air Freight System, Inc. v. NLRB, 510 U.S. 317 (1993).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Loper Bright Enterprises, et al., Petitioners v. Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 22, 2023

As part of that work, EDF advocates for effective and stable implementation of federal statutes such as the Clean Air Act, Food Safety Modernization Act, Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management … Rev. 431, 446–49 (1989) (recounting the policy challenges that led Congress to delegate certain powers under the Clean Air Act); Matthew C.