Documents

Oral argument — Govof VI v. Suarez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

What in the record demonstrates that the government acted to withhold Brady evidence? … Did you have anything more to comment? No, Your Honors.

Oral argument — 19-1752_Advanced Fluid Systems Inc v. Huber

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020

And knew they had them over an extended period of time because they were working with them and using them, right? That's correct. So your argument isn't that they didn't possess them. … So this was a fundamental structure of the Uniform Act, what became codified in the formal comment that we have now in 5304 of PUTSA.

Oral argument — Treasurerof Statev.USDepartof Treasury

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2012

And so the idea that there's somehow this vast intergovernmental immunities problem that arises only when the state acts through its custodial sheet that doesn't exist when it acts through its title sheet … I think once you get past the period of maturation of the bonds, the United States is doing nothing but holding them.

Oral argument — Rawdin v. The American Brd of Pediatrics

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2014

They reissued all of the regulations pursuant to notice of rulemaking to a comment period. They didn't attempt to change that regulation. … In our view, they're going against the prior 20 years of the Department of Justice's view and changing a regulation without notice, without a comment period.

Oral argument — Nadine Pellegrino v. USA Transportation Security Administration

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2019

Your assertion is search means search, and that's it, period. Those are all searches. They're all administrative searches. … The Transportation Security Act or the Federal Tort Claims Act? The Federal Tort Claims Act, Your Honor.

Oral argument — 21-1028_21-1029_Malletand Co v. Lacayo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2021

Stick with the Defend Trade Secrets Act. The Defend Trade Secret Act says if it's readily ascertainable, then maybe it's not a trade secret. Assume that it's not readily ascertainable. … I'd like you to respond to your adversary's comment with regard to paragraph eight of the findings of fact.

Oral argument — Bennett v. Cityof Phila

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2009

And this data covers the wrong period. It's 152 cases from January 2000 to September 2003. … Do you have any questions, comments? No, I have no questions. I'm impressed with the seriousness of the problem that you've all explained, I think. You have it in Pittsburgh, too? I'm afraid so.

Oral argument — Burtch v. Milberg Factors Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2011

price for that period of time. … So it's not surprising at all that the factors are acting differently.

Oral argument — Larsonv.AT&TMobility LLCetal.pt.1

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2012

You could go back a little further, and you could get more people from this period to this period. That would take even more time. So the judge is going to balance a few things, right? … Don't act. You absolutely, and as a proposed fiduciary, as a representative of his client, Allen Goulos, he had a duty to act because that's what that amended notice plan was about.

Oral argument — INREInsurance Brokerage A

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Bashman, let me go back to one of your very initial comments. … He's in the room, so he's hearing your comments now.

Oral argument — Zegreanvs Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2010

If nobody can take the steps because DHS can't forward a prima facie eligibility comment and nobody else can, then does 1239.2F mean anything at all? … Well, that's the whole point, but – Period. I mean, without all of the things that 1429 prevents from happening. Are you saying that the – Well, let's follow this through.

Oral argument — Advanced Disposal Services v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2016

I mean, there is turnover that goes on in any workplace over a period of time, constantly. … If it does, would it be accurate to have characterized them as acquaintances for a long period of time?

Oral argument — United States v. Green

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2018

And he filed his claim within a couple of years, within the limitations period. … Does it matter that Justice Sotomayor's comments were in a concurrence, not in a majority opinion?

Oral argument — In Re Blakeof Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

The comments made by the debtor's consultant were made, I presume, on his assumption that Prestek would not walk away from this Mitsubishi contract. … Well, I know you don't agree with it, period.

Oral argument — Ng v. US Attorney General

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 30, 2020

I think it's extraordinary measure for the third circuit to instruct the or any circuit court to instruct the board to act in a certain way other than to review the record. … Should there be some sliding scale of sorts, the greater period of time that elapsed, the more the BIA needs to specifically comment on the additional evidence, or should perhaps be the for us to go through

Oral argument — Cottillion v. URC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2014

Or because the IRS specifically says it doesn't comment on ERISA? … Laughlin was reasonable, that he was acting in good faith, including many of the class members, including Ms. Colosimo, who was employed by Mr. Laughlin.

Oral argument — Sodexomagic LLC v. Drexel University

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2020

Do they kick in immediately, or do they kick in after some sort of, you know, 10-day period for termination for cause? … I think it is rather ludicrous to assume that the language of 9.1 or 9.2 was acting as a reservation of rights, which is what you would have to find in order to... Mr. Cozen? Yes, sir.

Oral argument — City of Philadelphia v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2018

I mean, it acts entirely on local law enforcement, does it not? In just the same way that the Airline Deregulation Act did in Murphy. … But more importantly, what the city found, and that's why these policies go back for a long period of time. These aren't just recent vintage.

Oral argument — Cornelius v. CVS Pharmacy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2024

So it happens essentially one time in a hostile work environment, which is a pattern of acts over a period of time. Any one of those acts may not be actionable. But you get the pervasive part. … You have to have kind of show the comments. Right. So how can you how can you show sexual harassment in the absence of those types of comments?

Oral argument — Hemphill v. Landmark American Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 24, 2021

Yeah, but it's a claim for fraud, it's an intentional act. In our case, intent is not alleged. The word deception is used. … The court said that any deceptive negligent misrepresentation may be used to establish cause of action under the unfair trade practices act.