Documents

Oral argument — MANUS v. RANGER

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2005

In other words, this is a clean-up case. Their problem there, their main problem there was that it wasn't a clean-up case. … , violent act.

Oral argument — Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. v. Simplex Grinnell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2015

The only reason to do that, 30 or more feet up in the air, was to protect them from flying soccer balls. … It was a pain in the ass, but we cleaned it up. That's fine.

Oral argument — Jerome Scott, Sr. v. Sylvia Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2014

And the only way I can make sense out of this would be if a man is innocent, if he felt that he didn't do a particular crime, then he would act like Mr. Scott would. … I mean, the forensic, the DNA analysts for the state said that even if the car were to be cleaned, there would still be signs of DNA blood in there. And there was none.

Oral argument — Cherry v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2009

Sherry in this particular case, a maritime case under the Jones Act. … Jones Act generally speaks in negligence.

Oral argument — Shollenburg v.FDIC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2005

I've already stated to your honors that that only went on for eight months and they cleaned up their act by the time FDIC learned about it. … It's got, you know, we've got to clean up the act. They were ordered to clean up your act, pay those back taxes they did. They talked about, Ms.

Oral argument — Sulit v. DeMore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2004

Remanded to the I.J. with instructions to issue an order denying asylum, period. Why can't the B.I.A. do that? They can. … If you're in front of an immigration judge today, for example, and the only application for relief… On a clean slate.

Oral argument — United States v. Kevin Dugan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2011

So that entire period of time is excluded. … Beyond that, the two periods of time that are not covered by the motions are covered by two stipulations, a May 23, 2003 order, which excluded a period of time, and an October 7, 2003 order, which excluded

Oral argument — United States v. Ceja-Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2005

Two, the air fresheners. … And clearly, the act of going inside the car is a search at that point. But that didn't occur until after the 20 minutes.

Oral argument — Cooper v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2008

And so whether or not she would have been able to assert any intermittent leave during that period of time was up in the air as well. … And I think that the district court judge commented on our, well, I'm sorry, that's the Walker case, but commented in the Walker case. Speaking of which, why don't we get to that?

Oral argument — United States v. Michelle Wing

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2010

Plain air review? … Rhodes' comment that, in fact, the defendant here has, in fact, already been punished for what she did because she was indicted in Spokane, I think it was, but I may be wrong about that.

Oral argument — United States v. Javier Castaneda

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2009

Well, I think if it's relevant to the issue of dry periods, why there would not be methamphetamine. … So the government ran a good, clean trial. Yes, sir. Why don't you sit down. Thank you. He's four minutes over, too. Yeah, I know. I just want to clear up, Your Honor, that ‑‑ You're the octopus.

Oral argument — Eduardo Hernandez v. Marion Spearman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2014

Is that the only period you're contesting? No. There's a number of periods in contention. … On the first occasion, they denied his petition without comment. On the second ---- Yeah, yeah. They just sent a postcard. On the first occasion, they denied it without further comment, yes.

Oral argument — Hafer v. LABR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2008

A period, I think, in excess of five years, Your Honor. … The period of delay, again, is something that could have been addressed by the exercise of some options that the petitioner had.

Oral argument — Donell v. Kowell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2007

the confines of the Securities Act. … But it seems to me you're coming in fairly clean.

Oral argument — Archambeault v. Astrue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2009

Maxwell in about March 2001 and had been his last assessment was dated May 2003 that's a two-year period and whereas As far as Dr. … Would you comment on that for this job situation?

Oral argument — United States v. Manning

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2007

Oh, well, there's multiple authority for cleaning up Hanford. One is the Atomic Energy Act itself. Does it provide for regulation of those materials? Yeah. … You're welcome to go back and revisit anything, and if you would make a brief comment at the end with respect to the attorney's seat, that would be helpful. Thank you.

Oral argument — Jenny Flores v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2019

That comment period has closed. … If you look up the word ---- How about clean? Is clean in there anywhere? Sanitary sounds like it has some relations to cleanliness.

Oral argument — Singh v. Southwest Airlines Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2003

At best, she presented evidence that Southwest did occasionally clean up spills in front of their ticket counter, but there was no evidence that Southwest cleaned up spills beyond the 11-foot leased space … It's not failure to act. It is a required act on the part of the party seeking a jury trial. It is an express demand requirement.

Oral argument — Woods View II LLC v. Kitsap County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2012

In fact, the county is entitled to act as a provider of comments and opinions to another entity such as the Department of Health. This court has so held that it applies to local governments. … It is not a violation of due process for someone to send a comment.

Oral argument — Kivalina v. Teck

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2003

Yes, because the borough has been aware of these thousands of violations by the mine for many, many years and has taken absolutely zero enforcement action when they could under the Clean Water Act. … I mean, they, they, any citizen, any governmental authority has the opportunity under the Clean Water Act to bring the citizen enforcement suit that the Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee has.