Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Teresa Barringer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021

Their authority is to act in relation to possible federal crimes. … That's in Comment Note 4 of 1B1.1 that they are intended to stack.

Oral argument — Dominic Bianchi v. Anthony Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2024

And when we're in bank, we do act like a subcommittee. Counsel, can I ask one more analytical point? I know your position is that we could do that analysis here. … I mean, all kinds of cases are coming up, but Bruin, to pull from that language that it then wipes clean all of the cases that dealt with certain types of weapons, I don't think that's the case at all.

Oral argument — United States v. Kevin Shea

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2020

Was he incarcerated during that time period? … Barnett's, uh, uh, comments, uh, that if he's released now into the community, uh, we can't be totally sure. And of course, these are pretty serious things.

Oral argument — United States v. Khalil Blackman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2014

You have to be able to foresee the acts that the conspirators are going to commit. … It's actually this provision in CAFRA, the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act in 2000, which is found in Title 28.

Oral argument — Christopher Chin-Young v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2019

One more question or comment on that line. I'm assuming your position is if the court one of the district courts dismissed a claim of Mr. … The all of the due process claims, the 42 USC 1983 claim, the FTCA claim, the Privacy Act claim, the FMLA claim.

Oral argument — United States v. Henry Stephens

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2013

I'm not talking about judges, but commentators go, it was perfectly clear. … You read her comment as saying, we're really looking at tea leaves, but you read her comment to think that she believes, absent binding precedent, you never get good faith. That's the way I read it.

Oral argument — Dmarcian, Inc. v. DMARC Advisor BV

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2026

Yes, Abitron was a Lanham Act decision. … I understand, Your Honor, and we would agree with the Court's concerns and comments.

Oral argument — Felix Saloman-Guillen v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2024

And what we have here and what you're attacking is a standard that hasn't gone through a notice comment period. I'm not sure how it affects your rights in any tangible way. … That's an act of grace reserved for the Attorney General and is unrevealable. That determination has...

Oral argument — Zhenli Gon v. Gerald S. Holt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2014

We think the Dixon case out of the Supreme Court makes clear that except for a brief period in the early 1990s under Grady v. … If you want to rest on your brave phone, let me just make one comment for the court. And I should put this on the record.

Oral argument — United States v. James Cox

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2018

That he had a serious mental illness, that he was trying to manipulate the conditions of his confinement, and that his acting out was attention-seeking behavior. … I do think that puts the court on notice, as well as the cry for help argument that she made separate from those comments.

Oral argument — United States v. Clifton Mosley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2025

They put on 38 or 39 witnesses, they introduced over 300 pieces of evidence, and the case was tried over a three-week period. … Just briefly, I just want to comment on a couple of things that the government said. That Lisa Edmonds, it's been their position from the beginning that Lisa Edmonds was the intended victim.

Oral argument — Terri Cowgill v. First Data Technologies, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2022

Cowgill identifies the exact acts that are acts of retaliation. The discipline, the discharge, the failure to accommodate. We have the same actors, the same time frame. … And the watch your back comment was in February. Right when this first started. And she goes to the boss and says, I'd like my reduced schedule. And the boss doesn't give it to her.

Oral argument — United States v. Jerrod Mack

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016

So for purposes of 2k 2.1, why don't we look at both with equal force the guideline in 4b 1.2 as well as comment 1.2. … Why did they add comment 1?

Oral argument — United States v. Armond Dowdell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2013

Now, I recognize that there are a lot of cases that government counsel cited to which I responded that even have greater periods of time. … The period of time is but a factor among many that the reviewing courts should review.

Oral argument — United States v. Dwaine Allen Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2014

Well, now, so if the district court had imposed the 10-year period, it would have to be as an upward variance, wouldn't it? Yes, Your Honor. OK. … Collins made comments about worrying because he's an unregistered sex offender. Well, he's just been arrested for being an unregistered sex offender. He now knows.

Oral argument — L B J Energy, Inc. v. Brenda Duty

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2019

they worked, but the period of time. … Can you comment on that?

Oral argument — United States v. Eric Giles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2013

of 09 was a time period in which a jury could conclude that a conspiracy existed and that the messages were during that conspiracy and furtherance of it. … I would also point out in response to Justice Matsa's comment to begin with, the Frankson case, which was also cited by the government, is clearly distinguishable because that is a case as to whether or

Oral argument — Dawn Flores v. Ethicon, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2014

And during that 40-day period, and I hope I'm answering Judge Duncan's question, too. During that 40-day period, we compiled and marshaled together as much information as we could. … Well, what we have here, Your Honor, is how am I to determine, and this goes to counsel's comments that as to the affirmative versus defensive acts, and we pointed out to the court that we felt that an

Oral argument — Seaside Farm, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2016

But at the end of the day, both cases challenged what FDA did during a one-week period in June of 2008. … Spites has to run up against the law, which looks pretty strongly, as you argue it and as my colleagues have commented on it.

Oral argument — United States v. John McLean

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2013

We're dealing with a novel legal theory, something that has not really been addressed by any court before, an unknown medical standard that was not known to the defendant prior to his acts, because it's … And goes to Judge Payne's comment to Mr. Westling on the third prong or the third to wit clause of our indictment, this is about false statements in medical records case at the end of the day.