Documents

Oral argument — Antonio Johnson v. VT Halter Marine, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2020

First, the hostile work environment claim based upon the acts of four individuals in 2013 and 2014. Mr. … Newell had made the comment, because Mr. Newell had come by the tool room on many occasions. He was always friendly. He joked around with Mr. Johnson, and he couldn't believe he had made the comment.

Oral argument — Teresa Buchanan v. F. Alexander

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2018

Curry, who was the acting interim associate dean, received complaints from two students. … Buchanan had been found that she had violated the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Oral argument — Tuttle v. Gallegos

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2026

But B, under Graham versus Connor, his intent is irrelevant if the way he acted was objectively reasonable. … On their hands, gunshot residue flies through the air. It spreads as it's shot. There was many, many shots. That's how the science works. Was it on her face?

Oral argument — Benfer v. City of Baytown

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2024

Officer Calvert Just to be clear, because I know it's a period of time in the video. Once the wife is handcuffed, she eventually sits down as requested. … The extent of it and the effect of it, I think, are very much up in the air. Notably... At that level, we're not super humans here trying to scrutinize James Bond.

Oral argument — EEOC v. US Drug Mart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2023

I mean, so how much of this was known by them at that time over a 48, 72-hour period I think is a little bit maybe overstated. … And second, that the employee acted unreasonably in failing to take advantage of those measures, or somehow acted unreasonably otherwise in failing to avoid harm. In this case, U.S.

Oral argument — Ramchandra Adhikari v. Daoud & Partners, et

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2016

It's consistent with the Patriot Act. It's consistent with the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act. … And it has exclusive jurisdiction and control over Iraq at that point, but in particular the Al-Assad air base.

Oral argument — Marc Veasey v. Greg Abbott

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2017

is not moot, because the decision under the 1988 act was the remedy decision going out of the holding under the 1984 act. … We're not writing from a clean slate here.

Oral argument — Harry Swales v. KLLM Transport Services, LL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 11, 2020

I think that he was concerned that by commenting on the different facts in the record about control or commenting on how the parties made different decisions about running their business, he was concerned … that by commenting on that, he would be violating the Hoffman-LaRoche warning about not getting into commenting on the merits and soliciting, when soliciting other opt-in parties.

Oral argument — Brookwood v. City of Ridgeland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2024

No public comment at all about the application. … And then they move forward and simply treat them as adjudicative without analyzing what makes a legislative act legislative and what makes an adjudicative act adjudicative, which is what this Court, of

Oral argument — Michael Faciane v. Sun Life Asuc Co. of Canada

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2019

a reasonable time period? … ERISA's balancing act enforcement scheme.

Oral argument — Olivarez v. T-Mobile USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2021

It is the alleged wrongdoer co-worker who made these comments that he says happened back in 2016. … Morgan because as long as there's something that occurred within the time period, everything outside the time period can be brought within it. Thank you. Thank you, Ms. Weiss.

Oral argument — United States v. Eddie Wiese, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2018

But under the Armed Career Criminal Act, the penalty range increases to 15 years imprisonment to life and up to 5 years supervised release. … What I'm trying to get at is, you know, we don't want you to throw the circuits up in the air and say, well, the Fourth looks good. You have to have a reason for preferring one over the other, right?

Oral argument — James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2019

But that was Kagan quoting Justice Scalia, so that wasn't his comment on it. … The government wants to buy an air conditioning unit, and it prescribes a certain cooling capacity. But it says nothing about certain safety standards that state law may apply.

Oral argument — Texas Brine Company, L.L.C. v. Amer Arbitration As

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2019

for that particular time period. … And those cases were about extending deadlines when a party took an action to frustrate a time period created by Congress for the doing of an act. This is the opposite. There's no such time period.

Oral argument — Adler v. Energy Debt Holdings

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2026

Adler from making the argument that he should be sanctioned for having acted the way he did and brought the claims he brought in the bankruptcy court. … It wasn't just an offhand comment. It was a meaningful comment that ultimately found its way into an order before the court.

Oral argument — Megalomedia v. Philadelphia Indemnity

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2025

This exclusion, and the judge correctly noted this in the findings of the act. You lost me. … They're buying it through a program that is run by the Discovery Channel where the show's aired. And the Discovery Channel forces them to buy this specific coverage.

Oral argument — Lifshen v. 20/20 Accounting Solutions

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2021

If he gets called by the insurer as to his policy and they're saying it's you're in a grace period and he hasn't quite noticed, well, they might the other 2020 saying they paid it. … I'm merely suggesting, of course, that 2020 performed the physical act of paying with the practice's money. But there is that evidence, and it's in the appendix.

Oral argument — Caldwell Wholesale Co., L.L.C. v. R J Reynolds Tob

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2019

about these being separate acts. … Well, if that's the case, then each of those acts should have a one-year prescriptive period, and the acts that occurred within one year before the suit was filed should be allowed to go forward in this

Oral argument — Lavigne v. Hooper

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2024

And the factual basis shows that there were two separate criminal acts. … And that those are two separate criminal acts. They're not based on the same facts.

Oral argument — Bear Ranch, L.L.C. v. Heartbrand Beef, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2017

There it was an exception for the Texas Optometry Act and civil penalties. Here it's an exception for the common law. … If we simply, our opinion was we affirm, period, both sides would be upset. That's right, Your Honor. We would be disappointed.