Documents

Oral argument — Crisp v. USPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2026

You suspend him for a time period. You could suspend him for a long time period, but the last option they chose, you're gone, that's it, no quarter. … Hoffman raised, the idea that he wouldn't, and then I think this dovetails into your, your, your comment, Judge Wallach, the idea that he wasn't caught before.

Oral argument — MiiCs & Partners America v. Toshiba Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2019

is, and it's shifted over time, is that as long as you have an Operative Semiconductor in a TFT somewhere, if there is a silicon film at the overlap of the source and drain… …even if that location, it acts … He jettisoned his entire analysis of the starting point, plucked this license offer out of thin air, said, I have the number that he says is confidential in the record, but it's a certain number of cents

Oral argument — Valencell, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2019

It also acts as a housing. Fitbit contends that it constitutes the claimed housing, the shell support member, not the light guide. … What it said, in fact, so if the figure is figure 10 in Freighton and it's an air plug, it's got these ribs along the side. What about the most distal rib, 64, the furthest from the proximal end?

Oral argument — Dias V VA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2007

She should have complied within the period, and I argue that the period was too short. But maybe it wasn't, but I think it might be. … What's your comment on the need for a reason? I think that if that were a requirement, it would be spelled out in the regulation.

Oral argument — United States v. Millenium Distribution Lumber

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2014

Which case says that prejudgment interest does not accrue during a period of dispute? Does not accrue during a period of dispute. I'm not sure that there's a case that says that specifically. … Lee's comments. First of all, the letter of May 23, 2005, says that the government will take steps to protect its interests.

Oral argument — Astrazeneca AB v. Apotex Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2014

If that act of infringement hadn't occurred, Apotex would have never gotten FDA approval until the end of the exclusivity period, so there could have been no sales during that period. … Look, the commentators have talked about switching costs.

Oral argument — King v. USPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2006

And apparently it was the acting manager, Ms. Moore, had it in her mind that Mrs. King wasn't going to stay there. … I think just a comment, Mr. Stewart. I do think it's useful to give something like that to counsel before the argument so that they can look at it.

Oral argument — CANEX INTL LUMBER v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2011

Secondly, we did not argue it or point it out, but if you go to the record, we point out that that period of time, it was pointed out in our motion, that that period of time, that Customs was taking an … One is to give notice and opportunity to comment, or notice, first of all, the proposed change. Two, opportunity to comment.

Oral argument — MINESEN CO v. ARMY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2011

Another is the ongoing period during which the quantum proceedings are going, which will come to an end at some point. And the third period is the period after the end of the quantum proceeding. … On the question of the Slattery decision, I'd like for you to just briefly comment on your argument, in your briefs anyway, that the Slattery decision applies both to the Tucker Act and to the CDA.

Oral argument — +Souders v. SC Public Service

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 21, 2007

It can't be pulled out of the air. It's either in the complaint, properly read, or it's not in the case. Well, I disagree that it has to be in the complaint. … Would you like to comment on that? Yes. Do you want to stay at your remote time? Yes, please. Thank you, Mr. Taylor. Thank you. Mr. Bell. Good afternoon, Your Honor.

Oral argument — MEDTRONIC v. EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2013

And where the district court went off the rails is it looked at the comment to the proposed rule change. … disregard in this, whereas 120 was a new quinnage in the 52 Act.

Oral argument — Carriage House West II Assoc v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2016

So perhaps your comments are most accurate. Consult with my panel. I'm going to concur in the result because I feel the need to speak separately. … and Resident Home Ownership Acts were timely asserted under the Six-Year Statute of Limitations, 28 U.S.C.

Oral argument — United Steel and Fasteners v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2019

But when you look at the comments to the regulation, and you look at the end of the comments, and we think we're precisely in the comments to the regulation here, what Commerce said, and I'll quote, would … We're talking about practically a discrete period where, because our entries were not being suspended, it's a discrete period that have captured entries where there's, because of the duty rate for China

Oral argument — Mohsenzadeh v. Lee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2015

Example 13, which says, Further prosecution via a continuing application in which case the period set forth in 1.703 shall not include any period prior to the actual filing date of the application that … This is a belt and suspenders that the comments at the time said, everybody knows this doesn't count at all. And PTO said, yes, we're just putting this in here to remind applicants.

Oral argument — Prestonback v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2020

Armbrough, would you comment on... Can you hear me? Mr. … Form 550 itself says, if I voluntarily fail because of misconduct fail to complete the period of active duty. The action there is actually the service member's action. It's not the act of separation.

Oral argument — Pucilowski v. Justice

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2009

Well, that's when you're called to act. That's true. Okay. … The last day was two days in pay period 16 in 1998.

Oral argument — King v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2016

This is an unusual case regarding nonpayment of overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act. … And this case is about their claim for back pay and associated relief in the interim period. The only thing that changed in the interim period was their job grade.

Oral argument — Aristocrat Tech v. Intl Game Tech

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2008

We're talking about something that went through notice and comment. Right. Rulemaking. So it is legislative rule, right? … That's a fact or act.

Oral argument — Timken Company v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2015

When Commerce is making a discretionary decision on a case-by-case basis, it need only act within its statutory authority and does not need to provide a reasoned analysis. … The Joint Appendix contains our post-preliminary comments in their entirety, in fact. And so I've brought up only one volume here, but they contain the same arguments.

Oral argument — Barrett v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2006

The Veterans Administration and the Secretary of the Veterans Administration acts pursuant to statute. … The decision written by Judge Mayer in Barrett I specifically commented on the rich assets of the Secretary in terms of psychiatrists and other medical professionals.