Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.67s
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 4, 1996
Air Act, and the contingency measures required under section 172(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act) no longer applied so long as these areas did not violate the ozone standard. … One of the goals of the Clean Air Act is to minimize the health risks that people encounter.
61 FR 28061Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 14, 1995
The intended effect of proposing approval of these rules is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
60 FR 36252Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 25, 2013
The work practice standard was designed to minimize emissions of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) and PM during periods of startup and shutdown by requiring sources to maximize the use of clean fuels during … such periods when electric utility steam generating unit (EGU) temperatures and air flow may not be sufficient to effectively engage certain air pollution control devices (APCD).
78 FR 38001Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 27, 2016
A limited maintenance plan is a means of meeting Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for formerly designated nonattainment areas that meet certain qualification criteria. … Does the plan meet the Clean Air Act requirements for contingency provisions?
81 FR 33632Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Mississippi: Miscellaneous Changes
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 20, 2015
“Air Cleaning Device” Mississippi is amending the definition of “Air Cleaning Device” by adding language to clarify that the term “air pollution control device” is synonymous with the term “air cleaning … EPA has preliminarily determined that these changes to the Mississippi SIP are in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA policy and regulations.
80 FR 42774Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Indiana; Attainment Plan for Sulfur Dioxide in Southwest Indiana
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 24, 2020
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
85 FR 10350Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 22, 2005
The Adequacy comment period for these MVEBs closed on April 28, 2005. No requests or adverse comments on this submittal were received during EPA's Adequacy comment period. … “State Implementation Plan (SIP) Actions Submitted in Response to Clean Air Act (ACT) Deadlines,” Memorandum from John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality Management Division, October 28, 1992; 6.
70 FR 55550Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 5, 2004
EPA is proposing to approve Kentucky's and Indiana's SIP revisions because they meet all of the requirements of section 110 of the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 302Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 21, 2012
The public comment period for EPA's NPR closed on March 8, 2012. EPA received no comments on the proposed action. 1 William T. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
77 FR 29904Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 21, 2015
The CSAPR addresses the “good neighbor” provision of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) that requires states to reduce the transport of pollution that significantly affects downwind air quality. … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate
80 FR 50789Environmental Protection AgencyPetition — International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Iberia Air Lines of Spain
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
The opinion in this case also discusses the legislative history of the Clean Air Act. … This case arises under the Clean Air Act, as amended, (the Act) 42 U.S.C. | § 7401, et seg.’
450 U.S. 999Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 13, 2019
Air Act” dated 2019 (TSD). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
84 FR 27559Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 17, 2020
No public comments were received, and EPA did not provide comment or concurrence during this comment period. … See EPA's Guidance for Implementing the Clean Air Act Section 176(c)(8) Transportation Control Measure Substitution and Addition Provision dated January 2009.
85 FR 36504Environmental Protection AgencyIndian Tribes; Eligibility for Program Authorization
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Dec 14, 1994
Water Act (SDWA), and the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 11, 2006
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received comments from Jennifer L. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
71 FR 71486Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 23, 2019
Comments were solicited for a 15-day period through May 22, 2019. … , 44 and closed the public comment period on February 22, 2019.
84 FR 44238Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Surface Coating of Metal Furniture
Federal Register · Rule · May 23, 2003
The final standards implement section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) which requires the Administrator to regulate emissions of HAP listed in section 112(b) of the CAA. … The semiannual compliance reporting requirements may be satisfied by reports required under other parts of the Clean Air Act (CAA), such as those detailed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
68 FR 28606Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities; New York
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 15, 2004
EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. … In reviewing state plan submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 2302Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 14, 1999
Fulfill New Jersey's and EPA's requirements under the Clean Air Act (the Act). … The rule affects only one State, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.
64 FR 55662Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Secondary Aluminum Production
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 18, 2015
Air Act or implementing regulations. … pollution control device, transport the contaminated air to the air cleaning device.
80 FR 56700Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.