Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

3.63s

  • Oral argument — City of Wheaton v. Morningside Wheaton, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2018

    Once you take out the words, paid by the developer, and there's no argument here that the city attorney struck those as an act beyond his legal authority. … The comment was made that the city still doesn't know what's in this contract and still doesn't have the contract. Let's be clear on this also.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Klene v. Winn

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2025

    The theory is that they acted intentionally not to uncover evidence that then would trigger that duty. So, does that make a difference? … The objective of the conspiracy was just to make sure they can clean up PAYASO as much as possible.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Anderson v. Workers' Compensation Commission

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2014

    But there are these impingement syndrome diagnoses, and he goes in and cleans the shoulder. So that's why, whenever I depose Dr. Wright, I ask the questions in both fashions. … I would submit that's not exactly an aggravation under the Act. And even then, he gets better after July 27, 2009. How would you define an aggravation under the Act?

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Juan Collazo

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2016

    But when cross-examined, he admits, well, there really wasn't any construction area in this whole period. No signs of it, no construction, nothing. … During that time period, the Officer Hill and both Hill and Montgomery developed further information, the suspicious activity of Ms. Collazo, her movements.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Rogelio Fuentes v. Ralph Diaz

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2015

    There was a short period of time, I understand that. But being the father of a child with a girlfriend and the father-mother relationship is mediating. … It's not a quick mistake that can be cleaned up. Finally, I'd just note that the evidence in this case was not strong. It was considered circumstantial.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Genentech, Inc. v. Immunex Rhode Island Corp.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2020

    So since the statute only requires them to give you notice of the biological product, why would the 180-day time period restart? … In fact, it facilitates discovery by creating that artificial act of infringement. It gets the parties into court faster.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Shure Incorporated v. ClearOne, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2021

    Your Honor, the after arising clean construction is what introduced the configured for, the able to be used, the capable of use, the design to allow. … The court's order regarding the bond amount made very clear that the preliminary injunction acted to enjoin the 24-inch MXA 910.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Communications Test Design v. Contec, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2020

    When you say that, you're not saying that the true intent was not, I'm making air quotes, nefarious. That was a double negative. True, true. … I mean, in the briefing, we do take the position that CTDI acted in bad faith, that it had bad faith intent.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Elizondo v. Dept. of Navy

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2008

    And the appellee, just one more comment on their creative interpretation of the phrase direct evidence, goes clearly against what the U.S. Supreme Court has, how the U.S. … Department of Air Force and Jones v.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Pedro Caraballo-Martinez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2017

    You have reserved five minutes and you'll have the full rebuttal period. Thank you, Your Honor. Good morning, Your Honor. Andrea Hoffman on behalf of the United States. … So then why wouldn't the comment about the rationale of Phillips extending to merits determinations on 3582C2 be strictly, oh, bitter dictum?

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Anthony Pisarski

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2019

    No, it's a provision in the Medical Marijuana Program Act that requires the Attorney General to issue the guidelines that the Attorney General then issued. … You've had a plea, and now we're in this interim period, but in the plea there was an admission of intent to sell. Right, but that's a great question, Judge McCohen.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ricky Nababan v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2009

    This guy is ‑‑ I would echo Judge Ferguson's comment that you've been in this long enough. You know how the votes can be counted. And you don't need to spend a whole lot of time. … Did they send you out here on Air Force One? I saw a film on it yesterday. The plane had United on the side, but not the rest of it. United States, yeah. Thank you, Your Honor. Okay, thank you.

    14 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sheena Lipp v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2018

    In the record on Joint Appendix 177 is our undisputed statement of facts, and it says that the company fully accommodated her work schedule restrictions, as well as the obligation to provide a clean environment … case law says, Judge, that the Eighth Circuit case says that when you look at the employer's decision and they have to prove pretext to overcome our legitimate reason, they have to show that the company acted

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Dehne v. Reno

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2007

    Denea has more than done his part for his country, retiring as a lieutenant colonel in the United States Air Force, he's willing to speak up when government officials cross the line. … And when the mayor got into the airport matter, he knew that Denea was going to call him on it, and he wanted to squelch his comments. That's what it was all about. So at least that's Mr.

    17 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Lakewood Nursing & Rehabilitaion Center, LLC v. The Illinois Department of Public Health

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2018

    It wasn't something pulled out of the air. It wasn't end of the month fastest. They know how to use those words. As soon as practicable, they use those words in other places under the Act. … And who, in essence, by the state not acting within the mandates of the legislature, and the language was clear, not suggestive, in not acting within those time periods, the state is requiring a private

    52 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Lewis

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2015

    Doddson seems to have participated in his most recent comments regarding Raquenco. … Well, law release, first of all, says that the air is not to be touched off. It then proceeds to apply a plain air review and say this is always going to be plain air.

    68 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Dukes Bridge LLC v. Security Life of Denver Insurance

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2021

    Well, Your Honor, but neither was the Mermelstein trust found to be as committed to fraudulent acts. … Your time is up, but I do want – looking at this completely equitably, can we really say that this insurance company had completely clean hands, too?

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hughes v. Northwestern University

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2021

    Could you comment on that a bit? Well, Your Honor, we think that ERISA itself encourages plans to provide a diverse menu of investment options. … That number is plucked out of thin air.

    90 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Geralyn Goodsite v. Norfolk Southern Railway

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2014

    She doesn't go back to him for another five months to say it's not cleaned up or they're still doing this. Right? Right. … But Swaney has to be acting in retaliation, right? No. Swaney does not have to be acting in retaliation in order for the cat's paw.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sparling v. Daou

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2004

    One is for 33 Act claims. One is for 34 Act claims. … percentage of completion method, as you were indicating, Judge Fletcher, earlier, was used before, during, and after the registration statement, the prospectus, and subsequent 10-Qs, 10-Ks, always receiving a clean

    43 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.