Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

2.52s

  • Oral argument — Minority Television Project, I v. FCC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2010

    It was acting on the basis of 30 years of experience of the FCC review. It was dealing with an FCC report. … I'd like your comment. There is a, in fact, I mean, I think we have to work first from the statute itself, which I think that the terms of the statute are not impermissibly vague.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Griggs v. Griggs

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2012

    The parties were divorced in 1975, at which time the husband was on active duty in the United States Air Force making approximately $2,700 a month. … Smith was timely appealed after the divorce, and it was also within the timeframe of consideration of the passage of the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act, which did create a time period

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Zhi Wang v. City of Pleasanton

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2011

    Comcast is a franchise provider of services in Pleasanton and, as such, is entitled to install cable in compatible easements by the Federal Cable Act, by the California Government Code, Section 53066, … On the other hand, I think that they've acknowledged that they want to make sure that they treat you as good neighbors and clean up.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Elena Livenson v. Aeronautical Radio, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2022

    She simply says, a leader gets respect by his or her acts. And then just a third example for the court. There's an instance where Ms. … She put her on the project because she needed the code cleaned up and plaintiff was a good engineer.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Dmitry Fomichev

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2017

    And she said, okay, I want to come clean. Yeah, so everything... Sounds to me like she was participating. … But your position is that if the entrance to the ceremony is valid, period. Until and unless they have taken steps to terminate that marriage. Right. It can terminate at the back end.

    23 min of audio
  • Oral argument — LMK Technologies, LLC v. BLD Services, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2017

    And so when you couple those together, when you have this long period where people skilled in the art are not aware of, are not appreciating, have not recognized that problem, that is where the lapse of … Just to the elbow. ...to that pipe juncture, which you're referring to as the elbow, to provide a discrete hydrophilic band there, which happens to act as a multi-directional water stop.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Dulyan v. Gonzales

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2005

    Well, the presumption of regularity supports the notion that official acts taken by public officials is the presumption of regularity here. … It matters a lot whether the person or the two people came in in 1989 because they need a 10 year qualifying period here.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2014

    It's not just these terms in the air. … Your comment on that? Well, let's first look at what has happened.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Estate of Hoogerwerf

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2012

    We know from the record he's had a consulting arrangement and an agreement in place since 1997 that allows him to act as an agent for the company. … So now, if they go away, both of them go away, one has, one's hanging in the air. What are you going to do? Again, Rule 206 requires us to have a corporate representative.

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — CEAI Elmhurst Terrace, LLC v. Sanders

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2023

    As you can see from his authorities, he cites federal housing acts, the Illinois Whistleblower Act, solicitation of murder or criminal statute. … Look no further again than his final comments when he filed his motion to vacate in the hearing on April 11th. I want to leave the promises. In Mr.

    18 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Lupis v. City of Texas City

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2024

    I mean, it's almost like a prestigious kind of comedy act. And, uh, the, uh, but the officer detains the person who wasn't the target of the warrant for a short period of time. … That is something that would, we would like the opportunity to for leave to amend to clean up the complaint.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — IYO, Inc. v. IO Products, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2025

    And whether that's competitive in the Lanham Act sense as opposed to just some general sense of competitive is a different issue. … This is not an inexpensive item that, you know, like a bag of potato chips that someone might see a claim about air frying on. No batch of chips, yeah.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Friends of the Everglades, Inc. v. Secretary of the United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2026

    They've threatened other claims, like Clean Water Act claims and endangered species claims. There's nothing we can do on an appeal for preliminary injunction about threats of other kinds of claims. … It just does not make sense for the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act and additional funding claims to continue to be litigated in the wrong forum.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bernadette Pauley v. CF Entertainment

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2019

    And so we waited the 150 days, and then from that point in time, after that period had elapsed, we determined it was entered, and we filed our appeal. … And what's critical that you know that it's not based on untimeliness is the fact that if that were the case, some people would have the performers in the earlier episodes or episodes that had the re-airing

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Impress Communications, Inc. v. Travelers Prop. Casualty Co.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2021

    Wrongful act means any negligent act, error, or omission committed by our faculty insurer. … My recollection, Judge Kennelly, is that there was not a clean break between one and the other. Do you think there were different numbers of all three related objects or one?

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Pogosyan v. DHS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 11, 2017

    Oral replies are rarely given within the original response period. They're frequently scheduled after the response period has expired. That's the way I've seen it done for the last 15 years. … I've handled cases for Department of Homeland Security, Department of Treasury, Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense. Procedures are similar across the board that I've encountered.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Angelica Mendoza-Rubio

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2026

    And second, the District Court erred in determining that an incarceration period of 60 months was reasonable but no longer than necessary to comport with the goals of 18 U.S.C. 3553. … That is further evidence that the district court clearly aired here because the test is not whether one is essential, the test is not whether one has advanced education or skills, the test is whether one

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Love v. McDonough

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2024

    I mean, there might be different types of cancers, have different conditions with different implications, different periods of remission, recurrences. … But if the Secretary exceeds his or her authority, the Secretary is acting contrary to 1155, right? Correct. In excess of, and then thus, you have an unhinged executive, Your Honor.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — USAv.Gillette

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2013

    DeRusso say here that there's a question, at least in his mind, probably is in ours too, that the 1983 remedy against the territory is at least up in the air, even if it's prospective. … And the period of time in which Mr. DeRusso was representing Mr. Gillette was not that long, and when you signaled that you didn't think 2241 was the proper remedy, they moved to intervene.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Spear-Zuleta

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2022

    Yeah, I'm charged with the Hobbs Act robbery. Not necessarily that I understand the Hobbs Act robbery and what the elements of the Hobbs Act robbery are. … That is clean cash and should be available to anyone who has a claim under TRIA or any other claim they may want to make to.

    63 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.