Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.83s
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 10, 2003
Air Act. … Air Act.
68 FR 68738Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 2, 2011
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to determine pursuant to Clean Air Act (CAA), that the Chattanooga, Tennessee-Georgia, fine particulate (PM 2.5 ) nonattainment area (hereafter referred to as “the Chattanooga … What is the air quality for the 1997 annual PM 2.5 NAAQS for the 2007-2009 monitoring period?
76 FR 31900Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 22, 2001
EPA is approving this SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
66 FR 28054Environmental Protection AgencyApproval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New York; Consumer Products
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 16, 2022
These actions are being taken in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. DATES: This final rule is effective on October 17, 2022. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
87 FR 56893Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Apr 6, 2023
Clean Air Act, and California emission standards adopted under state law. … March 30, 1966; a date that predates . . . the Clean Air Act.”).
88 FR 20688Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 9, 2002
The more stringent numerical limit, and the elimination of the 85% reduction option, are not contrary to Clean Air Act requirements. … Air Act.
67 FR 62894Environmental Protection AgencyProtection of Stratospheric Ozone: Reconsideration of the 610 Nonessential Products Ban
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 15, 2001
Air Act, as amended. … Background Title VI of the Clean Air Act (the “Act”) divides ozone-depleting chemicals into two distinct classes.
66 FR 57512Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 7, 2001
SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve the State of Texas' Clean Fuel Fleet (CFF) substitute plan, incorporating them into the State Implementation Plan (SIP) under the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA). … EPA will not institute a second comment period. If you are interested in commenting on this action, you should do so at this time.
66 FR 9263Environmental Protection AgencyCertain New Chemicals; Receipt and Status Information for July-August 2025
Federal Register · Notice · Dec 1, 2025
(all-purpose cleaners, cleaning wipes, toilet bowl cleaners, powdered cleaners, floor cleaners), air and odor control (liquid electrical fresheners, gel air fresheners, scented candles, trash can deodorizers … (all-purpose cleaners, cleaning wipes, toilet bowl cleaners, powdered cleaners, floor cleaners), air and odor control (liquid electrical fresheners, gel air fresheners, scented candles, trash can deodorizers
90 FR 55102Environmental Protection AgencyRegulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: 2013 Cellulosic Biofuel Standard
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 2, 2014
Air Act). … Statutory Authority Statutory authority for this proposed action comes from section 211 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7545.
79 FR 25074Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 23, 2001
The intended effect of this action is this SIP revision in accordance with the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
66 FR 16135Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 6, 1996
Air Act Amendments of 1990; Proposed Rule'', 57 FR 18070, dated April 28, 1992, ``General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990; Supplemental; Proposed Rule … Air Act.
61 FR 20142Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 26, 2008
The revisions update Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM) provisions for Particulate Matter, and address Interstate Transport Pollution requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the Clean Air Act. … This action is being proposed under section 110 of the Clean Air Act.
73 FR 10203Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 9, 1998
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). C.
63 FR 11370Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 21, 2000
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. No comments were submitted regarding our proposed action on EDCAPCD Rule 229. … Air Act.
65 FR 45297Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Secondary Lead Smelting
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 13, 1997
The EPA will not institute a second comment period on the proposal. Any parties interested in commenting on the amendments should do so at this time. DATES: Effective Date. … Test Methods for Determining Hood Face and Doorway Air Velocities Comment: One petitioner (Docket ID No.
62 FR 32209Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Jan 4, 2013
subject to Clean Air Act preemption. … Air Act, or are not subject to Clean Air Act preemption. 4 74 FR 3030 (January 16, 2009).
78 FR 721Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 22, 2005
These actions strengthen the SIP in accordance with the requirements of sections 110 and 116 of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act), and will result in emission reductions needed to achieve attainment … Clean Air Act.
70 FR 48877Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 24, 2012
The public comment period for EPA's NPR closed on April 5, 2012. EPA received no comments on the proposed action. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
77 FR 30902Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 1, 2012
Pursuant to provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA establishes NAAQS for certain widespread pollutants that cause or contribute to air pollution that is reasonably anticipated to endanger public health … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate
77 FR 4940Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.