Documents

Oral argument — Lacey Marketplace Assoc. II v. United Farmers of Alberta CoOp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2017

Wholesale gets cleaned out. It's stock sold to UFA. Wholesale quits paying rent. Landlords need to find new tenants. The new tenants require tenant improvements. … That's the part of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act that has 11 badges that you look at.

Oral argument — Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2012

Period. … The reason they are not saying that they want to make a covenant of the — a copy of the Air Force One is that they don't want to make a copy of the Air Force One.

Oral argument — Solomon Stratton v. Mecklenburg Co Social Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2013

You mean to tell me the state of North Carolina can't act forthwith if they see circumstances where a child is in need of services and they have to wait for a hearing? … Were they clean? I don't see anything in the record. It seemed to me the state. That's capital punishment as far as I'm concerned for a parent to take your children away.

Oral argument — United States v. Halvorsen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2008

Well, I agree with part of that comment, Judge Fletcher. What happened is, up to that point, that home visit was because he had missed a urinalysis and a breathalyzer that particular day. … If the house were clean, he would have come to the door and said, Here I am, come in, look around, do whatever you want.

Oral argument — First Student, Inc., A Division of First Group America v. National Labor Relations Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2019

A bargaining obligation in the air. If you had reached an agreement with the union on March 2nd, you would have violated 8.82 because you wouldn't have known whether you had a majority or not. … But the importance in terms of reliance there, this is a period of time where a contract is being negotiated.

Oral argument — Appalachian Voices v. State Water Control Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 28, 2018

by outside groups, including comments of this nature. … The purpose of the required approvals is to give the state agencies, as the delegated agencies under the Clean Water Act, the purview to critically review and assess and determine the efficacy of those

Oral argument — Mejia v. City of Sacramento

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2006

My reason is they should have never pointed guns to a nearly naked man with his hands in the air, palms facing outward, unanimous testimony by the police department. I mean, what did they think? … Mejia is that they were pointed at him for a period of about three or four seconds. What was his testimony?

Oral argument — James Emmett v. City of Tacoma

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2017

And his response, which they characterize as just a flippant comment, was you should just shoot me then. It would make it easier. There are attempts to minimize the significance of that comment. … And did he hear that comment? He was not present for that comment, and that would not go to his analysis. But it certainly went to Bain's subsequent application of the taser. But when officers...

Oral argument — Emmert Industrial v. City of Milwaukie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2008

You just said — I thought you said, we can't accept this because it has this condition, period, and we're going to sue. Ah, okay. I see what you're — I see what you're saying, Your Honor. … It was liability in the future for past acts, for cleaning up pollution that had already existed.

Oral argument — Eric Mains v. Citibank, N.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2016

What about the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act? What's your claim there? … It goes back to law school of actually proving clean chain of title. We're not arguing about... I don't understand. He owes money on it. He won't pay the money. Well, what's the fraud?

Oral argument — Tikhonov v. Ashcroft

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2004

It wasn't that the immigration service came up with this document as the Court suggested out of thin air at the last minute and said, oh, by the way, here's some document. … I'm not sure how to comment on that, but – You know, they've got a conscience and they desert all that. All right.

Oral argument — United States v. Juan Collazo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2016

But when cross-examined, he admits, well, there really wasn't any construction area in this whole period. No signs of it, no construction, nothing. … During that time period, the Officer Hill and both Hill and Montgomery developed further information, the suspicious activity of Ms. Collazo, her movements.

Oral argument — Love v. McDonough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2024

I mean, there might be different types of cancers, have different conditions with different implications, different periods of remission, recurrences. … But if the Secretary exceeds his or her authority, the Secretary is acting contrary to 1155, right? Correct. In excess of, and then thus, you have an unhinged executive, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Angelica Mendoza-Rubio

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2026

And second, the District Court erred in determining that an incarceration period of 60 months was reasonable but no longer than necessary to comport with the goals of 18 U.S.C. 3553. … That is further evidence that the district court clearly aired here because the test is not whether one is essential, the test is not whether one has advanced education or skills, the test is whether one

Oral argument — Pogosyan v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 11, 2017

Oral replies are rarely given within the original response period. They're frequently scheduled after the response period has expired. That's the way I've seen it done for the last 15 years. … I've handled cases for Department of Homeland Security, Department of Treasury, Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense. Procedures are similar across the board that I've encountered.

Oral argument — United States v. Jose Acevedo-Tolentino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2019

And then, of course, under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, if there was any loss approximately caused by this offense, the District Court had statutory authority to impose restitution. … Under the clean slate doctrine, if an individual complies with several sets of requirements, he can have the 15-year registration period reduced to ten years.

Oral argument — In re: Stuart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 15, 2020

The creditor can say I'll wait for whatever period of time to figure out whether I'm going to get these attorney's fees. Well, there were no attorney's fees, Your Honor. That's a separate issue. … At Act 155, Your Honor, Mr. Stewart's counsel, Mr.

Oral argument — Martin Misjuns v. City of Lynchburg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2025

With regard to the transgender comments, again, I think we're on somewhat dangerous ground. We're in a very polarized world right now, Your Honor. … And any municipality would do what this municipality would, would do to clean up its act and communicate a simple message to the citizens of Lynchburg.

Oral argument — United States v. Steven Murn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2019

There's no evidence other than a short period of time when he was in the military that he wasn't using drugs. … So it appears that the defendant wants this court to basically act as a sentencing court.

Oral argument — TENNISON v. BUTTERWORTH

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2007

But, two, he's acting as a prosecutor in another case when he gets the information and discloses it. Yes. So it's not a clean case for any theory, I don't think. … It's very – it's very – it's not a clean case. Well, it's only mixed up because Tennyson and Goff were tried together.