Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

The American Paper Institute is a non-profit trade as- sociation whose members include companies which account formance with the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251- 1387 (1988).* Champion International … The succinctly-stated objective of the Clean Water Act is “to restore and main- tain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters.”” CWA § 101(a).

Amicus Curiae Brief — The ERISA Industry Committee, Petitioner v. City of Seattle, Washington

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 18, 2022

controverted, must yield to [the acts of Congress].” … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 95–98 (1983)) (emphasis added).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, et al., U.S. , 106 S. Ct. 3088 (1986) ("Delaware Valley I") «+++ + .25 Page Pennsylvania, et al. v. … Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, et al., _U.S.__, 107 S.Ct. 3078 (1987) ("Delaware Valley II") ... . Pilot Life Ins. Co. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Center for Biological Diversity, et al., Petitioners v. Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 5, 2020

Preservation Act, 54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq., the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq., the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 7401, the Archeological Resources Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. § 470 … , 42 U.S.C.A. § 6901, Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 7401, and the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300f.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Xiulu Ruan, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 27, 2021

As with the decisions concerning the Clean Water Act, some courts have applied International Minerals to the Clean Air Act, holding that it is a public welfare statute and that consciousness of wrongdoing … The Clean Air Act’s definition of “air pollutant” covers “any air pollution agent or combination of such agents, including any physical, chemical, [or] biological substance or matter which is emitted into

Amicus Curiae Brief — Consumers' Research, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Communications Commission, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 8, 2024

Sunstein, Is the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 MICH. L. REV. 303 (1999) ........................................ 12 Cass R. Sunstein, Nondelegation Canons, 67 U. CHI. L. … Sunstein, Is the Clean Air Act Unconstitutional?, 98 MICH. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Blanchard v. Bergeron

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

Delaware Valley Citizen’s Coun- eu for Clean Air, 478 U.S.546 vo (‘‘ Penn- Lh SRN a Se Ln. Se a ee 5, 17, 18 Pennsylvania v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, — U.S. —, —, 107 S.Ct. 3078, 3093 (1987) (Blackmun, J., dissenting) (emphasis added) (‘‘ Pennsyl- vania IT’’).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Doyle v. Hydro Nuclear Services

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

Cir. 2002) ............. passim Statutes Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. § 9610 (1994) ......... 2 Energy Reorganization Act, ek tem Err rege 1,2 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation … See Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), 42 U.S.C. § 300j-9(T) (1994); Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. §7622 (1994); Energy Reorganization Act (ERA), 42 U.S.C.§ 5851 (1994); Comprehensive Environmental Response

Amicus Curiae Brief — Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

Second Session at p.18: “ The Committee drew on the similar provisions of the Clean Air Act of 1970 and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 20 Amendments of 1972. … As discussed, supra, the history makes 24 clear that the RCRA citizen suit provision is based upon the comparable provision of the Clean Air Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. SW Gen., Inc., 136 S. Ct. 2489 (2016) (No. 15-1251)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

He also noted a Senate committee report finding that a majority of States have expressed concerns about the “EPA’s failure to adhere to the Clean Air Act’s cooperative federalism design.” … From the Founding period to the enactment of the FVRA, the statutory period during which an acting officer could serve was relatively short—varying from ten days to six months.!

Amicus Curiae Brief — Blatchford v. Native Village of Noatak

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

of Indian wars, the treaty period. the Indian removal period, the reservation period, and the allotment period, all aspects of a long- diseredited federal policy of suppressing (if not eliminat- ing … month President Bush signed into law the 1990 ‘Clean Air Act Amendments, putting all tribes, including Alaska Native villages, exercising ‘“‘substantial governmental du- ties and powers” over any “

Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Grants Pass, Oregon, Petitioner v. Gloria Johnson, et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 29, 2024

City of Los Angeles: A Dangerous Expansion of Eighth Amendment Protections Stifles Efforts to Clean up Skid Row, 40 LOY. L.A. L. … City of Los Angeles: A Dangerous Expansion of Eighth Amendment Protections Stifles Efforts to Clean up Skid Row, 40 LOY. L.A. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — The ERISA Industry Committee, Petitioner v. City of Seattle, Washington

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 18, 2022

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983)................................................ 8 U.S. Chamber of Com. v. … Gobeille, 577 U.S. at 319–20 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

In carrying out these objectives, NRDC has undertaken efforts to obtain clean air, clean water and toxic substances control, including activities to en- sure effective implementation of health and _ … ;'’ the Federal Water Pollution Control Act;'* the Federal Clean Air Act;'’ the a properly conducted bioassay and sheuld be presumed to be a risk to humans and that, as such, prudent public health pol

Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell Oil Co. v. United States (Nos. 07-1607, 07-1601)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

It is not the taxpayers per se who fund clean-ups when solvent PRPs cannot be located. Rather, Congress’s 1986 amendments to CERCLA create a Superfund that funds clean-up activities. … (emphases added); Ian Erickson, Comment, Reconciling the CERCLA Useful Product and Recy- cling Defenses, 80 N.C. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 7, 2024

air, clean and safe water, and healthy public lands. … Air Act and upset the proper balance between federal and state governments.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Fidelity Exploration & Production Co. v. Northern Plains Resource Council, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

Clean Water Act and offers them the best hope of protecting their land and their livelihoods. … It is consistent with other circuits’ approach to statutory interpretation under the Clean Water Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Borden Ranch Partnership v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

7 (iv) United States Environmental Protection Agency and United States Department of the Army, Memorandum for the Field, “Clean Water Act Section 404 Regulatory Program and Agricultural Activitios … Legislative History of the Clean Water Act of 1977, A Continuation of the Legislative History of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (1978) (“1977 Leg.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

The Bay partners need broad Clean Water Act jurisdiction to improve water quality. … The Bay partners need broad Clean Water Act jurisdiction to protect and_ restore vital wetlands and SAV areas.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

THE PROPER JURISDICTIONAL ANALYSIS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT REQUIRES A SIGNIFICANT NEXUS WELL BEYOND THE MOST MINIMAL HYDROLOGICAL CONNECTION. A. Clean Water Act. … Congress responded to that dramatic event by enacting the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387 (“Clean Water Act”).