Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,016 results
0.27s
Oral argument — 1820-1821_Astazeneca-Bristol Myers-Janssen v. Secretary US Dept HHS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2024
The patent exclusivity period dictates when generic competition may begin, and that is not affected by the Inflation Reduction Act provision. … But there there is no question that their patent exclusivity period, the period where they get to be free from competition under the patent law, is not affected in any way by this.
138 min of audioOral argument — In Re Daniel W Allen Sr
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2014
I guess I would start just by making a couple comments based on what Mr. Baruch had said. … Carpenter only showed up at the periodic board meetings as was required.
34 min of audioOral argument — Marcavage v. Boardof Trustees
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2007
With respect to the receipt of the award from League Counsel for a defendant during that same time period, the nature of an organization is important for this reason. … not Carl Bittenbender had reasonable grounds to believe that Michael Markavich was severely mentally disabled and in need of treatment, and then, pursuant to Section 302 of the Mental Health Procedure Act
40 min of audioOral argument — Dique v. NJState Police
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2009
Resolution Trust said that the cause of action arises when the plaintiff knows or has reason to know, quoting from Gibson at 435, which quotes from Gentry, the limitations period begins to run from the … Those cases which have held that Miranda is sort of a tort that's in the air. If a police officer questions me without giving me my Miranda warnings, I can't on that basis sue.
59 min of audioOral argument — Menjivar-Umana v. Atty Gen USA
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 27, 2021
Could you comment on that and whether that's accurate or not? Well, I don't think that the facts support that and that would be a factual finding. … I know that his aunt no longer has that house but he was able to go there and to live unharmed for extended periods.
43 min of audioOral argument — Wallach v. Easton Corp.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2016
However, if the mere act of retaining class counsel would render their motion for intervention untimely, that would be a very inefficient result. … The only question is whether or not it is a direct purchaser under Illinois BRIC and could sue for damages under the Sherman Act.
57 min of audioOral argument — Pennmont v. Frucher
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
Well, there were comments and all, and the SEC has never withdrawn it or amended it. … And what did they do in that 30-day period? On December 31st, they filed this lawsuit instead.
31 min of audioOral argument — Aly v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2020
In this case, for example, the misstatements and omissions that are the basis of the Section 10b Exchange Act claims run from the period 2013 to 2016. It's now 2020. … For each case, we looked at the start date of the class period, the end date of the class period, and the date on which class certification was denied.
50 min of audioOral argument — In Re Revel AC,Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2015
She said she had to go away for a short period of time. I believe she was gone for a week. Okay. But I don't think that that's what was driving her. … Judge, as you might guess, I hesitate to comment on what they did or didn't do. We felt it important enough to do it.
108 min of audioOral argument — Et Al_USA v. Savage_Et Al
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2022
And so, yes, the judge has clear discretion to act as he did. … Judge Jordan, if I could just make one comment, and that is that during a substantial period of time while I was serving as counsel, I was involved in a number of cases that included COVID and all related
92 min of audioOral argument — Burtch v. Milberg Factors Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2011
price for that period of time. … So it's not surprising at all that the factors are acting differently.
46 min of audioOral argument — Haybarger v. Countyof Lawrence
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2011
I would like to ask both counties at the beginning, Your Honor, to comment on the question of whether or not this appeal is going to finalize. Yes, sir. … Subsection 2 talks about the acts of employment, the acts affecting employment. And, you know, there are circuits that say it does not.
29 min of audioOral argument — Mylan Pharmaceuticals v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2016
In that 20-year period, and during that period, if I'm not mistaken, Sandoz developed a generic for customers. … Let me ask you a question about a comment in the brief that was filed by the FTC. It's at page 13.
42 min of audioOral argument — Bennett v. Cityof Phila
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2009
And this data covers the wrong period. It's 152 cases from January 2000 to September 2003. … Do you have any questions, comments? No, I have no questions. I'm impressed with the seriousness of the problem that you've all explained, I think. You have it in Pittsburgh, too? I'm afraid so.
51 min of audioOral argument — Hunt v. Piazza
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
Hunt did nothing for a period of three years. August of 2000 is the last correspondence from his attorney. … And that would become a critical period, because if the court accepts that he did have extraordinary circumstances and did act with due diligence up to that point, the Commonwealth would then argue that
32 min of audioOral argument — Zegreanvs Atty Gen USA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2010
If nobody can take the steps because DHS can't forward a prima facie eligibility comment and nobody else can, then does 1239.2F mean anything at all? … Well, that's the whole point, but – Period. I mean, without all of the things that 1429 prevents from happening. Are you saying that the – Well, let's follow this through.
39 min of audioOral argument — Advanced Disposal Services v. NLRB
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2016
I mean, there is turnover that goes on in any workplace over a period of time, constantly. … If it does, would it be accurate to have characterized them as acquaintances for a long period of time?
31 min of audioOral argument — Larsonv.AT&TMobility LLCetal.pt.1
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2012
You could go back a little further, and you could get more people from this period to this period. That would take even more time. So the judge is going to balance a few things, right? … Don't act. You absolutely, and as a proposed fiduciary, as a representative of his client, Allen Goulos, he had a duty to act because that's what that amended notice plan was about.
73 min of audioOral argument — Simko v. US Steel Corp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2020
He brought it in an untimely manner, well beyond the statute of limitations filing period. … Because the statute is real clear that a charge must be filed within 300 days of a discreet act. And it notes that this charge is a discreet act. And that's what Morgan made clear as well.
60 min of audioOral argument — In Re Blood Reagents
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2014
The variation comes in the latter part of the class period, where he uses alternative yardsticks. … The Dukes comment of Justice Scalia certainly leans toward the application of Daubert. It does. But he didn't go farther than that in the Comcast case.
36 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.