Documents

Oral argument — United States v. King County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2024

And that's at record 3 ER 391, where Modern testifies that if not for the executive order, it would have continued servicing ICE air flights. … Here we have a very clean connection. On summary judgment, we have testimony from the third party that the executive order was a but-for cause in their decision to stop servicing these flights. Mr.

Oral argument — Kane v. PaCap Aviation Finance, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2026

and the Warren Act. … We wouldn't have all the Warren Act issues, the Dislocated Workers Act issues, the liability issues. It would be a much more focused trial as to this point. And again, it's...

Oral argument — United States v. Thomas Tanke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2013

Do you want to adopt Judge Fisher's comments or would you like to modify them? Yes, I would adopt Judge Fisher's comments. Are you going to share your fee with him? … And in this case This was actually within the period that was alleged in the indictment.

Oral argument — United States v. Montgomery O'Connor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2004

Weintraub, if the law says that all that is required is one overt act within the period of the statute of limitations, it doesn't have to be a criminal act in order to save all of the other overt acts, … In fact, they paid the cleaning fee that were associated with those.

Oral argument — Capay, Inc. v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2017

Every inference he drew was based upon a supposition that there was no violation of the Act. … There were multiple attempts to contact employees within that 24-hour period. There were attempts to gather employees outside of the building on the day of the election.

Oral argument — United States v. MARTINEZ-AVINA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2007

And the air freshener comment, was that made during the interview? … Martinez was acting out of the ordinary.

Oral argument — Donna Avila v. Remco Hydraulics, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2010

Well, that's why I made the comment about the lawyer, because that's not our burden, about what tipped them. It simply was as the time began. … I mean, in today's Federal court world, that's a very, very long time to get your act together.

Oral argument — United States v. Eustorgio Flores

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 15, 2012

It's clean. It's not messed up, Flores states. There would be no discussion about the purity of a scale. The agents testified, it's clean, it's not messed up, referred to the purity. … And so there was, in fact, a clean scale and a messed up scale, so that comment could have been in reference to a scale. Unless the court has further questions, I'll submit. I don't.

Oral argument — LA Terminals, Inc. v. United National Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2025

It alleges that LAT failed to clean up or leak spills and releases of hazardous substances. … And as Judge Christin, as you said, we're talking about a 10-year period between 1982 and 1992.

Oral argument — United States v. Bellhouse

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2026

The deadline was May 15th and the Uncharged Acts of Christina and Maribela weren't noticed until four days after that deadline or 11 days before the time period expired. … And that was the reaching through the window and groping Christina's breasts in exchange for the cleaning supplies.

Oral argument — Jeff Bardzik v. County of Orange

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2010

He, in effect, tells this lieutenant, you know, I created a mess, you go clean it up. Well, we don't have that in the record. No, but it was a promotion. It was a promotion. … Anyway, finally, among other the Fazio and DeRuza factors that this court appropriately applied, was that during this time period, Lieutenant Bartzik earned approximately $115,000 a year.

Oral argument — Mid Continent Casualty Company v. Alan Engelke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2020

Because as the court has already commented, this went to a jury. Are you dropping the cross appeal? No, no. … If that's a problem for your client that you need to get that wiped clean, but it doesn't sound like it is. As long as the jury ruling stays in place, it's not a problem. Yeah.

Oral argument — United States v. Maher Obagi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2020

Flores specifically found that the prosecutor's argument was improper, that they acted like the defendant had confessed when the defendant had not confessed. … Saad was listed as one of the clean witnesses, along with Armstrong and Spinella.

Oral argument — County of Mohave v. Lexon Surety Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 28, 2017

It's also a breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing because the lender is acting to deprive Mr. … I have a few more comments. I don't know if... Well, let's have a few more, see if they're interesting. Okay.

Oral argument — Marcus Gerlach v. City of Bainbridge Island

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2013

That was a four-year delay, and if you have a violation of a time limit set by law, then that itself is an act in which there would be a 30-day period to bring a 6440 claim. … So if there's delay that violates a time limit set by law, in that case I think it was 120 days, then you can just bring your 6440 claim within 30 days after that failure to act, which is itself an act

Oral argument — CA Dept of Toxic Substances Control v. Alexander

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2003

Well, it had to be cleaned up, right? It did have to be cleaned up, your honor. And which method did your client propose that should have been effected that wasn't effected? … In the context of a record that shows that the remedial action plan was placed in the district court, public comment was specifically solicited, public comment on the remedial action plan.

Oral argument — Nikko Materials USA, Inc. v. Navcom Defense Electronics Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2013

Case was settled or those cases were settled over an extended period of time. The settlement, the fact of settlements were a public record. … It is clear that the California Courts of Appeal and the Supreme Court has cited favorably the restatement and comment.

Oral argument — NRDC v. County of Los Angeles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2010

But what's at stake in this appeal is the viability of citizen enforcement of Clean Water Act discharge permits. … What happens then under the Clean Water Act? Well, let me explain how the permit answers that.

Oral argument — Diogenes Jasso Bernal v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2019

how we communicate with each other is by speaking through the air vents. … You made a comment about some of his explanations that he had offered or about hearing noises? Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Dennis Murray v. Washington State Department of

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2009

Zam, testified that she looked at his behavior as a whole, not just to a particular singular acts. And we don't have evidence that says, listen, if Mr. … He also disrupted the plan by making disparaging, actual disruption, disparaging comments about his supervisors and his colleagues.