Documents

Oral argument — Kerron Andrews v. Baltimore City Police Dept.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2020

That seems to me where your comments are going. Am I correct about that? Well, Your Honor, I think there are a couple issues here. One is that Mr. Andrews was found inside a residence. … The question is whether they acted reasonably as against the plaintiff. That's not true.

Oral argument — Baltimore City Substance Abuse v. Mayor and City Council of Balt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2013

There may be isolated random comments, but that happens all the time when they're trying to calm down a group. … But Judge Motz ordered that you be given a 60-day period to amend the code without a court order.

Oral argument — David Goodman v. Z. Diggs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2020

If we agree with you that the district court aired and failing to consider the sworn complaints. … And so by making a comment to the nurse would not necessarily become a formal grievance at the facility. Um, so, uh, that's, you know, that, that's what, that's what happened.

Oral argument — Sharon D. Love v. Chartis Property Casualty Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2018

That case specifically, the exclusion reads, to any act committed by or at the direction of the insured with the intent to cause injury or damage to person or property, period. … Briefly, your honors, and I've commented on this, but I do want to raise the issue again. Chartists from the inception asked Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. John Dowell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2014

So it was a very calculated and predatory type of act. But he also had another victim. And I believe in his testimony even he made some comment about she wasn't really into it. … I did want to make one comment. Mr. Bostic did make a comment about the absence of violence in this particular offense. I would note that there was a fairly recent case, U.S. v.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Rand

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2016

The question is, did he act with the requisite statutory intent, the intent to obstruct a grand jury investigation? … And the district court in this case specifically found that there was no improper comment on the failure to testify and that there was no comment on Mr. Rand's personal wealth.

Oral argument — John Doe 2 v. North Carolina State University

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2024

That it needed specific knowledge from a specific act of police defense. Because that's not the law, and because it shouldn't be the law, this question is reversed. … The plaintiff is asking this court to not only staff inferences to merely speculate regarding why there was a 18 month period.

Oral argument — United States v. Stephen Simmons

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2024

They may have been locked up and some of their property sold to pay for their period of confinement. … Those had to do with temporary periods of things.

Oral argument — Mitra Rangarajan v. Johns Hopkins University

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2018

I feel like on the one hand, there are two different concepts in the air here. One is this idea of a warning and a second chance to comply. … And the District Court's findings on the errata, it still found that there were almost 500 corrections, comments, and proposed additions.

Oral argument — T.B., Jr. v. Prince George's County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2018

Immediately begins getting D's, getting F's, getting negative comments. Had never had a single negative comment. … The express purpose of the act is to ensure all children with disabilities have available free appropriate public education.

Oral argument — Christopher Covert v. LVNV Funding, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2014

And so, based on your Honor's comments, again, this. Well, these are, you know, whether we buy into them or not, this is the test where you're going. … It proves the inconsistency between applying the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Oral argument — Ross Development Corporation v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2013

Why don't you, if you want to add, don't add editorial comment and just answer a question. I'm sorry, Your Honor. I apologize. I'll wait for rebuttal then. Thank you. All right. Mr. Cotula. … In Triangle Industries, which is a 1992 decision of this court interpreting New Jersey law, the court looks at the acts that Triangle Industries was conducting.

Oral argument — Handsome Brook Farm, LLC. v. Humane Farm Animal Care, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2017

you need to change, you need to look at our company, and that's it, period. … Your Honor, we're not in any way seeking to limit their ability to comment about... I'm just trying to get the term with the narrowness of what you're claiming.

Oral argument — Carlton & Harris Chiropractic v. PDR Network, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2020

As the Court's aware, when the FCC solicited comments on aspects of its rule in 2003, it didn't, in the way it would in a notice and comment procedure, lay out exactly what its concerns were. … PDR only focuses on 2006 and they argue that that's the relevant time period. But they could have petitioned under functional music.

Oral argument — Brian C. Lee, Sr. v. Town of Seaboard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2017

Breezed means there's air, and wind. Breeze is a wind. So he was so close that it caused the wind to go over to him. Respectfully. That's what a breeze is, I think. … And in that instance, you're saying someone who is in the act of doing illegal and criminal acts to another, an officer can take a stance and shoot the person they're doing to it or shoot the car.

Oral argument — United States v. William Bridges

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2013

When a judgment on its face says that adjudication has been withheld, then you are lacking the one act that you need to make it a judgment of guilt. But the probation hasn't been withheld. … But, you know, somebody's essentially failed to register, but he hasn't done anything else in a long, long period of time. And here he's facing 18 months of jail time.

Oral argument — United States v. Benjamin Carter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2014

I guarantee you I've gotten more than once the comment, the boy, I've never had a guy who was stoned that I stopped, get out and try and hit me or pull a gun on me. … Because the possibilities of his acting irrationally with a gun would be a lot higher as a matter of common sense.

Oral argument — Abbie Platt v. Melinda Mansfield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2025

We don't mind you criticizing us, but don't bring up specific students or specific acts that identifies a student. … Because you allude to the fact that just before the public comment period commenced, that Chairman Mansfield did specifically allude to that policy and say not to target, criticize, or attack individuals

Oral argument — Westfield Insurance Company v. Sistersville Tank Works, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2022

It'll take a case where exposure is alleged outside of this 85 to 89 period and within the 89 to 2010 period for this issue to be right for a court to consider. … And the veracity of whether that is true or not, whether STW did anything negligent, STW would agree with Westfield that STW did not commit a negligent act.

Oral argument — Kirby McZeke v. Horry County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2015

McZeek by herself for a period of time of maybe a couple months running the office. … No performance problems noted during that time period.