Documents

Oral argument — Campbell Pet Co v. Miale

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2008

So that is why I say there's more than one incident over that time period. … Well, not so much a question as a comment.

Oral argument — ALLERGAN v. ATHENA COSMETICS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2011

Your Honor, as I said, the challenged act at its core is the sale of these drug products by the defendant. It's both an act of patent infringement and an act of unfair competition. … Pacific Air, California Supreme Court. The UCL is intended to protect competitors as well as consumers from unfair practices.

Oral argument — ITG Voma Corporation v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2019

This appeal concerns the unlawful application by the United States International Trade Commission of the Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, or TPEA. … The only opportunity that we had to provide comment, Your Honor, were comments on the factual record, which were due on July 10.

Oral argument — Calderon v. Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2026

The Veterans Court was aware of these mental conditions, and said it's still not enough to prevent him from either acting rationally or undertaking to file a timely notice of appeal. … Did you allege the PTSD, mental illness, and dementia aspect of that, that it covered the entire period that we're talking about, the tolling period?

Oral argument — JONES v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2011

That act is 128. And in that case, the question was whether it was a timely notice or a seal issue. … I just have a quick comment on the whole question of the fact that obviously the regulation does not specifically require writing.

Oral argument — HADDON HOUSING ASSOCIATES v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2012

Sometimes during the relevant period, Haddon made requests. … Does it accrue at the beginning of the anniversary date or during the contract period itself for that year? More specifically, under the Tucker Act, when does a year accrue?

Oral argument — BRINSKELE v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2010

And during this period of time, it, in its corporate mind, did not act as a purveyor of telephone services. … And Arthur Anderson commented on it and is questioning its legality. And Ms.

Oral argument — ESSAR STEEL v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2012

They found a subsidy because one was granted during the period of review. … With regard to the Special Economic Zone Act, SR alleges error because the goods produced pursuant to the Special Economic Zone Act were allegedly exported prior to the date that their application for

Oral argument — Hall v. Wilkie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2019

You used the term short period and we are not suggesting that short period was 10 days or 30 days. … My only comment up to this point was with respect to the writ. The writ was asking for specific performance relief. In that particular case, it was asking for a Board decision.

Oral argument — Northwest Title Agency, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2017

There is nothing in the course of conduct or how the Northwest Title closed 10,000 transactions over a period of two years with HUD. … The contract was never interpreted that way, and any clause that's interpreted that would require that should be stricken for being illegal or requiring an illegal act.

Oral argument — Pacific Gas v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2008

Agency has acted that way. Its intent doesn't count. That's why you don't have to defer to it, because the contract doesn't look to the intent of the NRC. What it looks to is the effect of the rule. … Again, this is a contract of long performance periods with potentially large ramp-ups for a very technically advanced...

Oral argument — Macias v. Army

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2017

And when this case falls out with the fact that he didn't really engage in law enforcement activity under the Posse commentators act, that charge should never have been made. … So I think that this is a big, I think the PCA is a big deal, the Posse commentators act.

Oral argument — United States v. WASHINGTON INTL INSUR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2013

There have been periodic cases against sureties and several have come up to this court. … So the Customs Mod Act, which was a major overhaul of the Customs Clause, was being enacted in 1993.

Oral argument — King v. USPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2006

And apparently it was the acting manager, Ms. Moore, had it in her mind that Mrs. King wasn't going to stay there. … I think just a comment, Mr. Stewart. I do think it's useful to give something like that to counsel before the argument so that they can look at it.

Oral argument — Milligan v. USPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2009

Of a pattern and as an example of specific comments that were made, quotation marks that were said by Mr. … It wasn't a period of two months, it was a period of about 16 to 18 months. 16, 18 months. Yeah. But in listening to...

Oral argument — Takeda Chemical v. Mylan Labs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2008

It isn't just an offhand comment. She really reasons through it. … Quote, when the court has set and the parties have agreed to a discovery period, that procedure necessarily governs the trial.

Oral argument — HARRIS v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012

Let me ask you about that period. … I… You withdrew that comment. Yeah, I withdrew that comment. The board's authority to reopen is open-ended on this case. Yes, it is.

Oral argument — Robinson v. Wilkie

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2018

The government is not saying that they acted reasonably in the 14-month delay. Isn't that correct? Well, we're not commenting one way or the other on that. … But the VA has never argued that they acted reasonably. If they had, who knows? We might find some basis for deference to that view. Aren't we reviewing the decision of the court?

Oral argument — MARVIN FURNITURE (SHANGHAI) v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2013

If you look at the regulatory history, why the regulation says, submit a copy of an entry or a date of first shipment with your new shipper investigation, the regulatory history, after notice and comments … here and how it acted later, and that's problematic for me at least.

Oral argument — Blackstone Consulting Inc v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2006

You keep coming back to the one sentence that quite correctly, strongly favors your side, but you're not dealing with the other sentence except to say that, well, that was some extraneous comment, but … These are two parties acting in a highly friendly, mutually complementing relationship, and you would think that in that context, the government would want to maintain that high level of goodwill and cooperation