Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.60s
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 12, 2002
EPA publishes regulations under sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act requiring states to submit control plans to EPA. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
67 FR 17944Environmental Protection AgencyApproval of California Air Plan Revisions, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 7, 2017
Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
82 FR 31457Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 15, 2003
This action is being taken under sections 107, 110, and 175A of the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 26212Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 4, 1997
MDE submitted these SIP revision requests pursuant to the rate-of-progress (ROP) requirements of section 182 of the Clean Air Act (the Act). … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
62 FR 41853Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 19, 2005
These actions strengthen the SIP in accordance with the requirements of sections 110 and 116 of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act) and will result in emission reductions needed to help ensure attainment … Clean Air Act.
70 FR 48645Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 20, 2001
We are proposing to approve local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Air Act.
66 FR 48399Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · May 31, 2023
Information About the Documents Two sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) govern the establishment and revision of the NAAQS. … Section 109(d)(1) of the Act requires periodic review and, if appropriate, revision of existing air quality criteria.
88 FR 34852Environmental Protection AgencyNotification of a Public Meeting of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee Lead Panel
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 31, 2024
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The CASAC was established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409(d)(2), to review air quality criteria and NAAQS … As amended, 5 U.S.C., App. section 109(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that EPA carry out a periodic review and revision, as appropriate, of the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six
89 FR 86801Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Nov 9, 2015
ACTION: Notice of availability and public comment period. … Information Specific to This Document Two sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA) govern the establishment and revision of the NAAQS.
80 FR 69220Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 3, 2021
The EPA is approving these revisions to the West Virginia SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This final rule is effective on April 2, 2021. … of the NAAQS for the remainder of the second maintenance period.
86 FR 12265Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Missouri; Construction Permit Exemptions
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 16, 2022
As explained in detail in the EPA's proposed rule, EPA finds these revisions meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act, do not impact the stringency of the SIP, and do not adversely impact air quality … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations
87 FR 50267Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 21, 2016
Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 21, 2017.
81 FR 93620Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Jan 4, 2013
Clean Air Act Waivers of Preemption Section 209(a) of the Clean Air Act preempts states and local governments from setting emission standards for new motor vehicles and engines. … EPA's Request for Comments EPA is offering the opportunity for a public hearing, and requesting written comment on issues relevant to section 209(b) of the Clean Air Act.
78 FR 719Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 30, 1995
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. … SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Part D, Subparts 1 and 4 of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (hereafter referred to as ``the Act'') set out air quality planning requirements
60 FR 45056Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 18, 2015
A number of environmental laws authorize EPA's actions, including but not limited to: • Clean Air Act (CAA), • Clean Water Act (CWA), • Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability … Clean Air Act Abstract: The Tribal Minor New Source Review (NSR) program applies to new and modified minor sources and minor modifications at major sources of air pollution in Indian Country.
80 FR 35082Environmental Protection AgencyGeneral Services AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Aug 21, 2018
Public Comments During the public comment period, the EPA received one brief and anonymous comment on the proposed action. … (i) The submission in Enclosure 1 titled “SIP Revision: Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2)(D) 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards Air Quality Division” dated December 3, 2015; (ii) All
83 FR 42214Environmental Protection AgencyStandards of Performance for Coal Preparation and Processing Plants
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 27, 2009
In addition, we reviewed the CO data collected for coal-fired industrial boilers in support of the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 112 maximum achievable technology (MACT) standards. … As used in this subpart, all terms not defined herein have the meaning given them in the Clean Air Act (Act) and in subpart A of this part.
74 FR 25304Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 29, 2010
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
75 FR 44731Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 17, 2015
This proposed action is consistent with EPA's interpretation of certain requirements of part D of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). … These standards present state and local governments with the minimum air quality levels they must meet to comply with the Act.
80 FR 49187Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · May 22, 2012
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen VanSickle, Clean Air Markets Division, (6204J), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. … On 01/12/2012 (77 FR 1930), EPA sought comments on this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received one non-substantial comment during the comment period.
77 FR 30279Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.