Documents

Oral argument — Photomedex, Inc. v. Irwin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2009

But for the period of time from 2003 until 2007, the representation was not that the FDA would approve this had they, in fact, submitted it. … So your argument is, okay, let's make this a clean case instead of the case we have in front of us, that it's quite clear that this device has never been submitted to the FDA for approval, there's never

Oral argument — United States v. Justin Schneider

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 19, 2025

Schneider did not act out of self-defense and instead acted out of this longstanding animus. … To me, the issue is whether the wife's testimony was sufficient to satisfy the 404B conditions, period. Certainly, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Oquendo-Lorenzo v. Hospital San Antonio, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2019

I think we're talking about Act 278 of 2012. That's the statute the district court was interpreting. Yes, Your Honor. … Liability limits to students, residents, pediatrics, neonatal specialists, and pediatricians, obstetricians, gynecologists, surgeons, period. It doesn't name the institution themselves.

Oral argument — Trinell King v. Ricky Pridmore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2020

King testified that the conversation, which went on for almost a two-hour period, started turning sour. People started getting frustrated. … If there's a violation of law, then a state agent has no authority to act differently.

Oral argument — Heren v. Beshears

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2025

Cloninger testified that she even spent two weeks with the Retzers to help them cook and clean. These people were friendly. … But you are, I mean, there has to be a 20-year period within that 60. Do you agree with that? Absolutely, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Brittney Terry v. Spring Indep School Distr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2016

By agreement of the parties, a first amended complaint was filed a couple of months later in June of 2014. to clean up the original complaint. … She wasn't at school during those time periods.

Oral argument — Goodworth v. Suh

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2004

How do we know that in all of these transactions, Ainsworth was acting on behalf of Goodworth or acting on his own? Because he never acted on his own. How do we know that? … Balabanian wants to comment on that. That's his client.

Oral argument — United States v. Walter Rausini

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2013

But Judge Patel's comments both on the 2nd of November and the 7th of November, I would respectfully suggest on this record, show good facility with the letter. … has been well aware that a new district judge will not be the Honorable Marilyn Patel and will evaluate this case by his or her lights and will make his or her decision about what's appropriate on a clean

Oral argument — Robert Ponzio v. Emily Pinon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2023

And I do submit to this court that as a Floridian and former Atlantean, no air conditioning does render the car unusable. … The court failed to act as a fiduciary for the class. It failed to act as a fiduciary for Mr. or for Mrs. Acuna and for Mr. Parker and for the entire class.

Oral argument — ABC v. DEF

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2019

He doesn't act maliciously or with ill intent toward that. He is not dealing with this parolee on a day-to-day basis. … But as the district court determined after a full airing of the undisputed facts on cross motions for summary judgment, this is not one of those cases.

Oral argument — Sanchez v. Guzman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2023

Well, what if I came up on Judge McHugh, and I'm a police officer, and I say, put your hands in the air, and she reaches down toward her pocket? … To touch quickly on comments made by Judge McHugh, obviously plaintiffs have waived any potential factual disputes that they would have otherwise raised on summary judgment.

Oral argument — Judith Cox v. WA Dept. Social & Health Svcs.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2017

The only duty we owe is under the statute 2644, which requires merely that we act reasonably in placement decisions or removal decisions. … The first psychological report had come back and had given a relatively clean bill of health, I would say, was accepted that way. The second, of course, much more concerning.

Oral argument — Alcresta Therapeutics, Inc. v. Alex Azar, II

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2018

The competitive bidding is done, and then the results of that competitive bidding are reflected in notice and comment rulemaking. Right. And so payment rates are set for each of the bundled items. … And Your Honor, the Medicare Act requires presentment and exhaustion, and we've said to the extent that they're disputing coverage and payment, Medicare Act requires...

Oral argument — Shaw v. Donahoe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2015

There were no acts of retaliation. … We know she got some overtime during this period, Your Honor.

Oral argument — H'Shaka v. O'Gorman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2019

His worst period is at the beginning of 2013, where he's been in upstate for a number of years. And I've come to learn this. … O'Gorman got on board, he really cleaned house. No, I understand that point.

Oral argument — McDonald v. State of Illinois Department of Human Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2010

What about the 60-month look-back period? Apparently that's been changed. Can a state still have a shorter look-back period? Well, the state still uses 36 months. There are no rules in place. … Let's fix them and let's do them in accordance with the Administrative Review Act.

Oral argument — People v. Thompson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 29, 2017

Other comments that she details in the letter were a comment by juror number three that she thought all these guys are on drugs. … So, you know, basically Pena Rodriguez wipes the slate clean and says, we're just saying right now that racial bias, we have to keep this out of the jury room. It's too important.

Oral argument — Patterson v. PowderMonarch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2018

That's period. Number two, when they get there, either she or her husband, they don't remember, go to pick up the ticket. … We clearly stated a cause of action under the under the Ski Safety Act beyond any question. I really do wish I had more time to discuss all those things in detail with you.

Oral argument — IYO, Inc. v. IO Products, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2025

And whether that's competitive in the Lanham Act sense as opposed to just some general sense of competitive is a different issue. … This is not an inexpensive item that, you know, like a bag of potato chips that someone might see a claim about air frying on. No batch of chips, yeah.

Oral argument — Communications Test Design v. Contec, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2020

When you say that, you're not saying that the true intent was not, I'm making air quotes, nefarious. That was a double negative. True, true. … I mean, in the briefing, we do take the position that CTDI acted in bad faith, that it had bad faith intent.