Documents

Oral argument — Jeffrey Plaskett v. Ryan McCarthy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2021

I mean, there's a final, if you will, interim final sanction amount, but isn't the amount of back pay still somewhat up in the air? I don't believe so. … Did it give you a specific time period though to do that? It did give a time period. And then contrary to opposing counsel's suggestion, it didn't put the burden on the Army to come back.

Oral argument — Kevin Stout v. FreeScore, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 26, 2013

FreeScore also represents that it can help potential customers quickly address incorrect information, and dragging down their credit scores, and help them to ensure that their credit report is clean. … But important, Your Honor, that was under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Oral argument — WALKER v. SHINSEKI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2012

The continuity is broken if after service you have a period when something didn't happen and it was as a result of an intervening cause. … If someone suffers hearing loss during the period of service, that's service-connected, correct? Under 3.303A. Yes.

Oral argument — Indemnity Insurance Company o v. Westfield Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2022

I cannot find an explanation for that in the record, but obviously our argument is that the parties acted as if, all the parties acted as if it was understood that the withdrawal was under all the policies … In other words, it was alleged a three-year period.

Oral argument — Batista v. Stewart Enterprises

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2004

He leaves it up in the air. In order for us to meaningfully respond to that and refute that, we have to cover our bases. He's not limiting it to just the employee handbook. … But I'd like to address also Judge Hugg's comment with respect to Kramer requiring an interpretation of provisions as opposed to a mere reference to.

Oral argument — Curtis Fauber v. Ronald Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2022

The other is what's essentially due process claim from the prosecutor's comments. … And so can you comment on the procedural default issue and how you see its relation to the rest of your claims?

Oral argument — Mirabella v. Villard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2016

So it's your view that it cannot be a retaliatory act if all one is doing is complying with their legal requirement? Correct. And they're simply alerting Mr. … Mirabella that they had certain rights under Rule 1023.1 to seek sanctions if he filed a frivolous lawsuit, period. And if the same email was sent to a non-attorney, would you argue it the same?

Oral argument — Julienne Busic v. TSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2022

Casham also rejected the act on the reasonable suspicion standard, as well as the need for a live hearing, which was also rejected. … She's been unable to attend important social and civil gatherings, and she's been deprived of her liberty interests and travel for that entire period of time.

Oral argument — Stephen Hummel v. St. Joseph County Board of Com

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2015

It happened, let me just comment, it happened in 2013, just three years after we filed the lawsuit. … We're focused primarily, it seems to me, on the Americans with Disabilities Act, right?

Oral argument — United States v. Justin Schneider

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 19, 2025

Schneider did not act out of self-defense and instead acted out of this longstanding animus. … To me, the issue is whether the wife's testimony was sufficient to satisfy the 404B conditions, period. Certainly, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Oquendo-Lorenzo v. Hospital San Antonio, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2019

I think we're talking about Act 278 of 2012. That's the statute the district court was interpreting. Yes, Your Honor. … Liability limits to students, residents, pediatrics, neonatal specialists, and pediatricians, obstetricians, gynecologists, surgeons, period. It doesn't name the institution themselves.

Oral argument — Trinell King v. Ricky Pridmore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2020

King testified that the conversation, which went on for almost a two-hour period, started turning sour. People started getting frustrated. … If there's a violation of law, then a state agent has no authority to act differently.

Oral argument — Heren v. Beshears

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2025

Cloninger testified that she even spent two weeks with the Retzers to help them cook and clean. These people were friendly. … But you are, I mean, there has to be a 20-year period within that 60. Do you agree with that? Absolutely, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Brittney Terry v. Spring Indep School Distr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2016

By agreement of the parties, a first amended complaint was filed a couple of months later in June of 2014. to clean up the original complaint. … She wasn't at school during those time periods.

Oral argument — United States v. Walter Rausini

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2013

But Judge Patel's comments both on the 2nd of November and the 7th of November, I would respectfully suggest on this record, show good facility with the letter. … has been well aware that a new district judge will not be the Honorable Marilyn Patel and will evaluate this case by his or her lights and will make his or her decision about what's appropriate on a clean

Oral argument — Robert Ponzio v. Emily Pinon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2023

And I do submit to this court that as a Floridian and former Atlantean, no air conditioning does render the car unusable. … The court failed to act as a fiduciary for the class. It failed to act as a fiduciary for Mr. or for Mrs. Acuna and for Mr. Parker and for the entire class.

Oral argument — ABC v. DEF

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2019

He doesn't act maliciously or with ill intent toward that. He is not dealing with this parolee on a day-to-day basis. … But as the district court determined after a full airing of the undisputed facts on cross motions for summary judgment, this is not one of those cases.

Oral argument — Cynthia Carpenter-Barker v. Ohio Department of Medicaid

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 1, 2018

Because Ohio's Nurse Practice Act prohibits it. … I mean, it bothers me that Megan's condition has deteriorated throughout this period, but your client continues after every annual review. They deny it again, and they appeal the next one.

Oral argument — Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Chubb Custom Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2025

predating the policy period our plan quote is More like a true excess or umbrella policy than a primary policy This class of claims is expressly carved down and bar plan did not undertake to provide primary … on a clean slate this is Erie and Because one of the things that happened very quickly after Erie was was that there were a lot of Regional circuit courts that had developed some really helpful federal

Oral argument — Judith Cox v. WA Dept. Social & Health Svcs.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2017

The only duty we owe is under the statute 2644, which requires merely that we act reasonably in placement decisions or removal decisions. … The first psychological report had come back and had given a relatively clean bill of health, I would say, was accepted that way. The second, of course, much more concerning.