Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Ruiz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2024

So we think that connection in and of itself is why we can satisfy the third prong of plain air review. … And if this weren't on plain air review, we might have more of a- It might be a very serious problem.

Oral argument — George Anibowei v. Loretta Lynch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2020

We have no authority on that so the issue of prevailing on the merits is still up in the air. … Over what period of time? Let's say three years? Yes. Okay. Were there any times during that same period that he traveled and his phone was not selected and searched?

Oral argument — United States v. Nursingcaremanagement Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2024

, cleaning, medicating their attendee. … Correct, Your Honor, but you have to take some period of time to get to the office in the first place, and the Portal to Portal Act clearly precludes that.

Oral argument — Tomas v. Bondi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2026

OK, and the shootings took place over what period of time? I believe, Your Honor, the period of three plus years. OK. … So if it's a matter of he's trying to fire the gun in the air to sort of be sort of menacing over the course of years to say, I want that house get out.

Oral argument — Lancaster v. Attorney General USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2017

So why should it be remanded for a clean record here and have it assessed without what I would say is clear prejudice against the petitioner? … Most of her comments were made – and I read that there were two long passages.

Oral argument — Randall Menges v. Austin Knudsen

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2022

They're the Air National Guard's mandatory retirement age. That employee didn't have to sue the Air National Guard. It was enough that the county employer had adopted it. And even Bassett v. … sex acts.

Oral argument — Alaris Health v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2024

It ends for this period to that period. What the board has said is that's not what happened. You committed an unfair labor practice, so it continues on. Nobody negotiated it. … All right, so if we disagree with you, you're saying the remand is in order to allow the parties to air out just how much would be owed and what the theory is?

Oral argument — Minority Television Project, I v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2010

It was acting on the basis of 30 years of experience of the FCC review. It was dealing with an FCC report. … I'd like your comment. There is a, in fact, I mean, I think we have to work first from the statute itself, which I think that the terms of the statute are not impermissibly vague.

Oral argument — 04-35210 Marceau v. Blackfeet Housing Authority

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2007

Judge Ferguson, I'm having trouble hearing your comments. I don't know how your mic is set up. All right. How's that? That's perfect. Okay. … Henry Dodd, the proponent of the General Allotment Act, stated that housing was a central element of the act.

Oral argument — Smith v. Ace Insurance Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2009

They look at Section 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act. And they say, the court has ubiquitously said, since Greenlee, Section 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act has expressed the intent of Congress. … So why isn't that sufficient so that they could clean it up all at one time? That, I think, is the real issue you have to deal with. Well, let me try to address that head on.

Oral argument — NicQuid v. FDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2026

And I think as you said, the FDA has unquestionably violated that requirement in the Tobacco Control Act, which requires notice and comment, and to give an opportunity for all stakeholders, including manufacturers … That's not regulated by the Tobacco Control Act because it doesn't have nicotine. And nicotine in it. Nicotine would be the product.

Oral argument — Estate of Kendall

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2018

Merz is going to address the duty issue, and we'll leave the comment issue with Ms. Holt, because we had resolved our matters with the comment. … The car of the defendant went up in the air, went through a brick wall and window, crashed down onto the plaintiff's decedent, killing them.

Oral argument — USAv.Gillette

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2013

DeRusso say here that there's a question, at least in his mind, probably is in ours too, that the 1983 remedy against the territory is at least up in the air, even if it's prospective. … And the period of time in which Mr. DeRusso was representing Mr. Gillette was not that long, and when you signaled that you didn't think 2241 was the proper remedy, they moved to intervene.

Oral argument — Ulmer v. Campbell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2025

So if I can kind of draw on the air, Your Honor. So I'm going to flip the property upside down just so that way I can start at the top. … It's not the beginning of the statutory period. It's the continuation of the statutory period.

Oral argument — The Fisher National Bank v. Miles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 19, 2013

They were within any period of redemption if they had been sold at a tax sale. Okay. … A trial court comment on that? Did not, no. Okay, go ahead.

Oral argument — United States v. Robert Collazo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2019

And that doesn't amount to an affirmative act on his part to facilitate their activities. … Amador was acting as a secretary at the highest level of the Mexican mafia.

Oral argument — United States v. Raylin Richard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2018

no per se rule in this circuit that the victim, meaning the person who the child who's photographed or whose image is captured, has to sort of knowingly and affirmatively engage in any sort of sexual act … The last thing I'll mention is counsel made a comment about, well, we weren't sure which victim it was. The defendant would have received discovery by that time.

Oral argument — Perry v. H. J. Heinz Brands

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2021

Safe clean. Thank you, Your Honor. May it please the court. Mr. Perry had more than 10 years to make bona fide use of his matchup mark. … He produced receipts for 34 sales over a period of 10 years. None of them reflects a sale to a non-Louisiana resident.

Oral argument — A10 NETWORKS v. BROCADE COMM

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2013

Well, you can track the Taiwan Patent Act. If I found, is the Taiwan Patent Act a public document? It is. … Period. Period. The ministry has a number of things that are all based on conditions. They're all conditions.

Oral argument — United States v. Alfred Jerry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2020

And when you look at the comments, they stated that they limited it, but as opposed to nonviolent threats. And one example they gave was injury to reputation. … The first of which is the air must be clear and clear or obvious and not subject to reasonable dispute.