Documents

Oral argument — People

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2024

Whether Best Buy acted knowingly. And in light of the Lowe's decision. I think it makes sense to break down that scienter question. Into a pre-compliance alert. And a post-compliance alert period. … The federal false claims act. Versus the Illinois version. Is is a linguistic one. That the federal false claim act. Does not discuss. Does not mention audits. Whereas the false claims act.

Oral argument — Stephanie Hicks v. City of Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 23, 2017

Specifically, the comment by Richardson that Agent Hicks was a stupid cunt for taking 12 weeks. … The evidence was that she was also cleaning houses on the side to help make ends meet and that she was also a photographer for families' babies.

Oral argument — Homav.American Express Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Bland conceded as much in his opening comments by saying that I think his comment was to the effect that Mohammed involved, you know, looking at the facts of that case. … I mean, there's a wealth of case law and comment, regulatory comment, about the need for banks to be able to operate in a uniform fashion nationally. And if you accept Mr.

Oral argument — Viehmeyer v. City of Santa Ana

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2003

Well, are you referring to Rutherford and Betty Jones as a matter of failure to intervene or the acts of the officers themselves? … But the Doe time period already expired. That's true.

Oral argument — Photomedex, Inc. v. Irwin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2009

But for the period of time from 2003 until 2007, the representation was not that the FDA would approve this had they, in fact, submitted it. … So your argument is, okay, let's make this a clean case instead of the case we have in front of us, that it's quite clear that this device has never been submitted to the FDA for approval, there's never

Oral argument — CAMARENA v. SLADE

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2004

So the way this whole mechanism is structured, it's to make sure that the inmate completes his rehab in the way that he is clean and sober, he attends his group sessions. … Maybe they were – I'm not saying they were acting with bad motives, but the Supreme Court decided they weren't applying the law correctly, and now Mr. Cameron is going to fall in the St.

Oral argument — United States v. James

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2025

justified at its inception and second whether the officer's subsequent actions were reasonably related in scope to the circumstances that justified the stop in the first place here the district court aired … to my opponent's arguments about the the officers officers saying that they were quote killing time the record reflects that at the time that sergeant David made that statement he was referring to a period

Oral argument — Bass v. Cook County Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2015

Ira Blumen, who is the medical director of UCAN, the University of Chicago's Air Medical Network, and also acting as designee of UCH's EMS medical director, specifically authorized the participation of … But I suppose there is a section in the EMS Act that has EMS medical director immunity in it. So I have no further comments, and I rest on my arguments. Counsel, thank you.

Oral argument — Nation v. Piedmont Independent School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2022

Nation to the Piedmont Police Department during their investigation attaching pictures of a cut that Jayan suffered on his head in that same time period. She said it was right after Christmas break. … But then another case out of this district held that a teacher who had a student clean out a toilet with his bare hands was not a constitutional violation of his 14th Amendment rights.

Oral argument — Mukand Intl v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2006

Is it your view that the relevant section of the Administrative Procedure Act creates a cause of action? … logic of that is if Congress should make it easier for small or weakly funded companies to make Commerce do what it should do, then that's up to Congress, not something the court can create out of the air

Oral argument — Rondy's Inc. v. Tractor and Equipment Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2003

Well, the clean point that the Court made was that there was no concealment because that recommendation was right on the label. … They had to be replaced periodically. He had the manuals on board. He referred to them. And it was perfectly clear that the bearings were inspected and reused.

Oral argument — Tolliver v. Sisto

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2007

And as Judge – and it was brought in habeas, and Judge Posner said that 2254D1, the standard of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, did not apply to such a proceeding. … If you took a clean slate and simply said, then Beggs and Sass and Irons had never come down. Okay. Could you be here today? I – the Attorney General might not have appealed.

Oral argument — Brown v. Dickey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 25, 2024

Her legs are being held in the air while she's giving birth. He's keeping notes in a journal saying she's pushing babies here. … This took place over a long period of time and was very dedicated. And cookish also talks about inmates going to the bathroom and changing clothes that extended views of those people.

Oral argument — Dome Patent L.P. v. Lee

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2015

The threshold issue in this appeal is whether Section 282A of the Patent Act constrains the decision-making authority of patent trial and appeal boards in the same way that it constrains the authority … It's about one-third of the oxygen content in the air underneath your eyelid as it is just in the air itself.

Oral argument — Marinello v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

limiting interpretation, and obviously you talked about this in your brief, but I just want to give you an opportunity now to try to convince me, because right now I feel as though it comes out of thin air … So somebody — I — somebody offers to clean my gutters, and he says, $100 cash, $125 if you pay me by check. Is that a violation of this? No, not at all. Why not?

Oral argument — Malkandi v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2008

Well, I believe one of her lines of defense is that you should credit him for coming clean as they characterize. I would not characterize it that way on his six years of past lies because... … Now let's go back a little bit to the travel facilitator comments that Mr. Peachy made. And to the testimony of Agent Marks and Agent Smalley, that Mr.

Oral argument — Mavrix Photographs, LLC v. Live Journal, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2016

I mean, a corporation doesn't just act. It's employees or it's agents. Human beings act. Agency law is the only body of law one can look to. There is no body of other law. … The stuff's clean. We can do whatever we want with it. That's the big issue before this court. You see, they don't want to be like YouTube because YouTube accepts anything and everything.

Oral argument — National Material Co., LLC v. The GSI Group, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2020

And it's the simple 5% interest calculation that is provided by the Interest Act. So that would that would be our request. … during that 2008-2009 period?

Oral argument — Susan Beiersdorfer v. Frank LaRose

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2021

In fact, I found in a footnote or a comment within the Schmidt decision that the Sixth Circuit noted that the district court actually was only looking at due process kinds of interests. … The sixth circuit found that that one word was a very substantial act of protected free speech.

Oral argument — Harreld v. Butler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2015

Well, isn't there an ordinance or some sort of city authority that they have put in place to clean up sort of the neighborhoods or help people who need help with these federal funds? … Well, my comment about the public duty rule not applying is that it was simply to state that the courts have recognized it as a protection in traditional government functions such as police and fire functions