Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.32s
Oral argument — Marinello v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017
limiting interpretation, and obviously you talked about this in your brief, but I just want to give you an opportunity now to try to convince me, because right now I feel as though it comes out of thin air … So somebody — I — somebody offers to clean my gutters, and he says, $100 cash, $125 if you pay me by check. Is that a violation of this? No, not at all. Why not?
60 min of audioOral argument — U. S. Bank Nat. Assn. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2017
It just made the comment that it was the appropriate due diligence for an investment of $5,000, which in this case was none. … Or let's say you have an extensive period of negotiation.
59 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Matthew Mason
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2013
I am the one who says, um, on the night before Mr Ray's Well, you wouldn't have just pulled that out of the air. I did not just made the date unless you had some reasonable basis. Correct. … He said he knew the driver from their period of incarceration together.
47 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Murphy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2005
It was simply a figure pulled out of the air that the city was asserting that they were out for some psychological reason. … The Hicks case predated the Mandatory Act, which contained a similar provision as was added to the Victim Witness Protection Act in 1994.
20 min of audioOral argument — Inman v. Howe Freightways, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2019
And what you have is a shorter time period than what you have in Spencer, for example. … And I'm just going to make this comment.
46 min of audioOral argument — National City Mortgage v. Bergman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2010
I want to focus in on Section 7 of the Mechanic Lien Act. … And the point is that this four-month period is not something that merchants pulled out of thin air. That was a requirement, or that is language that's contained in Section 7.
35 min of audioOral argument — Upson v. Wilson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2025
And then she gives what I thought was undisputed testimony that when she's tapping him, she's listening for air pockets, whatever it is she describes. … His signs or his symptoms had only been going on for a short period of time. He gave testimony about her discounting his claims of pain.
31 min of audioOral argument — Chance Brumfield v. City Of Seattle
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2013
Maybe another judge wouldn't have acted in the same way. … Meaning, if somebody's hand is flailing in the air, how can he say, was it down here, out here, where was he, and so forth?
32 min of audioOral argument — Alex Bakalian v. Central Bank Rep. of Turkey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2016
The Inderlich Air Force Base is the only Air Force Base the United States has in the Middle East. It has 5,000 airmen, it has tactical nuclear weapons, it has Patriot missiles. … The Air Force base argument only applies to one of the two. That's correct. That's correct. The Air Force base argument only applies to one of the two.
82 min of audioOral argument — Kevin Stout v. FreeScore, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 26, 2013
FreeScore also represents that it can help potential customers quickly address incorrect information, and dragging down their credit scores, and help them to ensure that their credit report is clean. … But important, Your Honor, that was under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
24 min of audioOral argument — Minority Television Project, I v. FCC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2013
There's notice, comment, public comment, et cetera. And then Congress moves in and passes a statute. So why hasn't — why isn't there sufficient record here for what Congress did? … So this is Congress acting in response in part to an extensive rulemaking.
65 min of audioOral argument — George Anibowei v. Loretta Lynch
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2020
We have no authority on that so the issue of prevailing on the merits is still up in the air. … Over what period of time? Let's say three years? Yes. Okay. Were there any times during that same period that he traveled and his phone was not selected and searched?
37 min of audioOral argument — Viehmeyer v. City of Santa Ana
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2003
Well, are you referring to Rutherford and Betty Jones as a matter of failure to intervene or the acts of the officers themselves? … But the Doe time period already expired. That's true.
47 min of audioOral argument — Malkandi v. Holder
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2008
Well, I believe one of her lines of defense is that you should credit him for coming clean as they characterize. I would not characterize it that way on his six years of past lies because... … Now let's go back a little bit to the travel facilitator comments that Mr. Peachy made. And to the testimony of Agent Marks and Agent Smalley, that Mr.
41 min of audioOral argument — Mavrix Photographs, LLC v. Live Journal, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2016
I mean, a corporation doesn't just act. It's employees or it's agents. Human beings act. Agency law is the only body of law one can look to. There is no body of other law. … The stuff's clean. We can do whatever we want with it. That's the big issue before this court. You see, they don't want to be like YouTube because YouTube accepts anything and everything.
34 min of audioOral argument — Tolliver v. Sisto
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2007
And as Judge – and it was brought in habeas, and Judge Posner said that 2254D1, the standard of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, did not apply to such a proceeding. … If you took a clean slate and simply said, then Beggs and Sass and Irons had never come down. Okay. Could you be here today? I – the Attorney General might not have appealed.
40 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Naarl Richard
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2013
Installation of the tracking device on all riches vehicle without a warrant and it's used to monitor the vehicle's movements for the purpose of obtaining information for a period of 27 days constituted … Meaning once the dog does the free air sniff and hits on the car, there's reason to get inside the car. The drugs are found in the search warrants obtained.
32 min of audioOral argument — People v. Sandifer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2016
We're cleaning the slate. … That is the reason that the Rape Shield Act or some version of it has been enacted in the 50 states and there's a federal Rape Shield Act.
52 min of audioOral argument — Service Employees Internation v. Preeminent Protective Service
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2020
Because you didn't appeal those orders within the 30-day time period. Sure. … The District Court assumed jurisdiction pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, and under the Act, section 9 U.S.C. section 16b, an appeal may not be taken from an interlocutory order under the Act directing
54 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2011
I think the point is more whether or not his activity in supporting this group by coming to the United States, by arranging for resources to get to them, was an act that the government of Vietnam directed … How do you think the BIA and IJ aired in their analysis of the credibility of your client?
19 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.