Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.66s
Air Plan Approval; ID, West Silver Valley PM2.5 Clean Data Determination
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 22, 2018
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R10-OAR-2017-0170; FRL-9985-39-Region 10] Air Plan Approval; ID, West Silver Valley PM 2.5 Clean Data Determination AGENCY: Environmental … Based on the proposed clean data determination, the EPA is also proposing to determine that the obligation for Idaho to make submissions to meet certain Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) requirements related
83 FR 53201Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 22, 2002
All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 64990Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 21, 2015
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 20, 2015. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
80 FR 2860Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 25, 2012
TIP commented that it supports EPA's proposed approval of each applicable Texas regulation because these regulations comply with the Federal Clean Air Act and are important components of Texas's stationary … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
77 FR 65119Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 11, 1995
Background As part of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Congress added a new subsection (k) to section 211 of the Clean Air Act. … such oral comments pursuant to section 307(d)(5) of the Clean Air Act, as amended.
60 FR 2693Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 27, 1996
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. … Background Under the pre-amended Clean Air Act (i.e., the Clean Air Act before the enactment of the amendments of November 15, 1990), ozone nonattainment areas were required to adopt RACT rules for
61 FR 43973Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 4, 2002
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
67 FR 62184Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 22, 2004
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments on our proposed action. III. … Air Act.
69 FR 3012Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 19, 1999
The intended effect of this action is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. DATES: Written comments must be received by September 20, 1999.
64 FR 45215Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Indiana
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 8, 2004
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” … National Technology Transfer Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 64661Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 6, 2019
pollution requirements of the Clean Air Act for the 1997 and 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) ( i.e., ozone transport SIPs). … Response to Comments EPA received one comment during the comment period stating that EPA cannot “rely on a rule that a court has now vacated,” referring to the recent ruling by the United States Court
84 FR 59728Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 6, 2000
EPA is approving these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
65 FR 35840Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Feb 29, 2024
Abstract: Transportation conformity is required under Clean Air Act section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)) to ensure that federally supported transportation activities are consistent with (“conform to”) … Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory pursuant to Clean Air Act section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)) and 40 CFR part 93. Estimated number of respondents: 145 (total).
89 FR 14835Environmental Protection AgencyNotice of Request for Approval of Alternative Means of Emission Limitation
Federal Register · Notice · Feb 8, 2021
SUMMARY: This action provides public notice and solicits comment on a request by Rohm and Haas Chemicals LLC, a subsidiary of The Dow Chemical Company (Dow), under the Clean Air Act (CAA), for an alternative … Air Act CBI Confidential Business Information CFR Code of Federal Regulations EPA Environmental Protection Agency HAP hazardous air pollutant(s) MTVP maximum true vapor pressure NESHAP national
86 FR 8618Environmental Protection AgencyDiesel Fuel and Engines: An Analysis of EPA's New Regulations
Congressional research report · CRS Report · May 1, 2001
In many cases, including the introduction of the current low sulfur (500 ppm) diesel in response to Clean Air Act requirements in 1993, the refining industry converted more equipment than necessary to … Such logic flies in the face of the 30-year success story of the Clean Air Act.54 Whether the technology to meet the standards can be developed in time will need to be apparent several years in advance
RL30737Congressional Research ServiceFederal Register · Rule · Aug 26, 2005
and that all other Clean Air Act requirements for redesignation to attainment have been met. … See the proposed action for a full description of how the maintenance plan and redesignation request meet Clean Air Act requirements. II. What Comments Did We Receive on the Proposed Action?
70 FR 50212Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 11, 1997
The intended effect of approving these rules is to regulate emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Response to Public Comments A 30-day public comment period was provided in 61 FR 29659. As described above, EPA received one significant comment from the SCAQMD on SCAQMD Rule 1130.1.
62 FR 37136Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 17, 2000
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards established … Air Act (CAA).
65 FR 8060Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; Indiana
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 25, 2005
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” … National Technology Transfer Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
70 FR 70999Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; ID; West Silver Valley Redesignation to Attainment for the 2012 Annual PM2.5
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 15, 2021
EPA is proposing this action pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 15, 2021. … Quality Management Division, September 4, 1992 (Calcagni memorandum); (2) “State Implementation Plan (SIP) Actions Submitted in Response to Clean Air Act (CAA) Deadlines,” Memorandum from John Calcagni
86 FR 51318Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.