Documents

Oral argument — Waugh, et, al. v. Morgan Stanley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2012

Levenson is acting as a volunteer, but Illinois law is clear that volunteers must still act reasonably. … He has to take periodic tests. He's got to go through periodic education.

Oral argument — In Re Petition of Frescati

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017

Most of these cases, trial judges are not looking at a period of 11 years and $143 million loss at the outset. … I mean, the key here is to get that cleaned up in the first instance and then sort of sort out kind of who's responsible for it. But, you know, Judge Hardiman, you're absolutely right.

Oral argument — Susan Beiersdorfer v. Frank LaRose

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2021

In fact, I found in a footnote or a comment within the Schmidt decision that the Sixth Circuit noted that the district court actually was only looking at due process kinds of interests. … The sixth circuit found that that one word was a very substantial act of protected free speech.

Oral argument — Harreld v. Butler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2015

Well, isn't there an ordinance or some sort of city authority that they have put in place to clean up sort of the neighborhoods or help people who need help with these federal funds? … Well, my comment about the public duty rule not applying is that it was simply to state that the courts have recognized it as a protection in traditional government functions such as police and fire functions

Oral argument — People v. Davison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2009

The purpose of it is not for terrorist acts, which is what this statute was for. By the legislative history, by what the senators said. … took the propane tank with the anhydrous ammonia to dispose of it, at that time, and this is at page 176 and 177 of the trial record, he was wearing a fireman's coat, rubber gloves, and a gas mask with air

Oral argument — 04-50057, 04-50170 USA v. LEON-ESPARZA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2005

For the probation officer to say, well, you don't have to bother with the program, you're clean, I'm satisfied, get out of here. That, in effect, that would, of course, not be bad for my client. … Because in that, no, because the 1984 and 1994 acts actually narrowed probation officers' authority to do so.

Oral argument — Consumer Financial Protection v. Armond Aria

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2022

But then he changed it at some point during the period of the relevant time period. Yes. I mean, so two points there. … You know, since I'm in environmental law in my day job, I'm thinking of something like the Creek Clean Water Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Ajayi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2022

Ajayi acted knowingly. As I've just addressed, it's in the opening paragraph for each of the counts. … This is not a clean charge. I mean, what was the... I do believe that the sum of the charge, though, was directed at addressing the unique facts of this case.

Oral argument — Steele-Warrick v. Microgenics Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2024

And instead of acting on that immediately, like, listen, first I applaud them for eventually acting and doing the right thing. So that's a good thing. … But you – no reason to comment on it now. You'll have an opportunity to send us a letter.

Oral argument — Oregon Natural Deser v. BLM

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2007

Well, ONDA did provide comments on the draft EIS and those comments raised the issue about off-highway vehicles, but I think it is very general. … So in other words, the public was never told that BLM was going to look at other things, other components, and apply that information to wilderness, because BLM explicitly washed its hands clean of the

Oral argument — Smith v. Ace Insurance Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2009

They look at Section 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act. And they say, the court has ubiquitously said, since Greenlee, Section 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act has expressed the intent of Congress. … So why isn't that sufficient so that they could clean it up all at one time? That, I think, is the real issue you have to deal with. Well, let me try to address that head on.

Oral argument — People v. Miller

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2017

But I think we can infer from these comments both by the jury and the defense counsel that they saw the defendant acting unusually. Now, we love to speculate. … The judge's comment during the...

Oral argument — United States v. USDC-CASF

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2017

And since what they actually want is DACA to be still in effect, they're not challenging the rescission of DACA in the air. … But the second point I would say is that we think that there are strong arguments that even though the adoption of DACA required notice and comment, the rescission of DACA does not require notice and comment

Oral argument — United States v. Hernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2024

It's just a matter of whether it was an accident or whether it was an intentional act. … I was cleaning with gasoline, I had a cigarette, and then there was an explosion. So the defendant's statements can't even exist in the same plane.

Oral argument — United States v. Deshaun Tisdale Dangelo Davis Winston Hill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2020

understand that say the brick is thrown back at you do you get a self-defense instruction for initially throwing the brick at somebody well i would argue in this case with the time with a 15 minute time period … argument and or well it's really an ineffective assistance argument because it would be plain air so that's that's why i think we have this uh strong inertia in favor of waiting for the 2255 yes and and

Oral argument — Alma Judith Jimenez v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2020

And the Board characterized that record as just random acts of violence. But this court said that was incorrect, not supported by substantial evidence. … It was enough for the IJ to make these comments about skipping the line and those comments in and of itself violated her right to proceedings before an unbiased adjudicator.

Oral argument — Marinello v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

limiting interpretation, and obviously you talked about this in your brief, but I just want to give you an opportunity now to try to convince me, because right now I feel as though it comes out of thin air … So somebody — I — somebody offers to clean my gutters, and he says, $100 cash, $125 if you pay me by check. Is that a violation of this? No, not at all. Why not?

Oral argument — U. S. Bank Nat. Assn. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2017

It just made the comment that it was the appropriate due diligence for an investment of $5,000, which in this case was none. … Or let's say you have an extensive period of negotiation.

Oral argument — United States v. Matthew Mason

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2013

I am the one who says, um, on the night before Mr Ray's Well, you wouldn't have just pulled that out of the air. I did not just made the date unless you had some reasonable basis. Correct. … He said he knew the driver from their period of incarceration together.

Oral argument — Holden v. Wilson Management, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2019

Were he acting as a landlord or was he acting in regard to his role as CRM? … And there's, so there's no inference that Bob's acting, excuse me, plaintiff says that there's an inference that Bob was acting on behalf of Wilson Management LLC.