Documents

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri

Federal Register · Rule · Apr 2, 2008

Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards established … This process generally includes a public notice, public hearing, public comment period, and a formal adoption by a state-authorized rulemaking body.

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Indiana

Federal Register · Rule · Jun 13, 1996

Submittal Background Section 182(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (the Act) requires all moderate and above ozone nonattainment areas to achieve a 15% reduction of 1990 emissions of VOC by November 15, … SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements a State has already imposed.

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arizona Phoenix Nonattainment Area; PMINF10

Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Jul 28, 1994

See section 188(b) of the Clean Air Act. The air quality planning requirements for moderate PM10 nonattainment areas are set out in subparts 1 and 4 of Title I of the Act. … of state action. the Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds.

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District

Federal Register · Rule · Sep 13, 2002

Under authority of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), this action simultaneously approves a local rule, Rule 1132, that regulates these emission sources and directs California to correct … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received comments from the following parties: 1.

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Oklahoma; Attainment Demonstration for the Central Oklahoma Early Action Compact Area

Federal Register · Rule · Aug 16, 2005

These actions strengthen the SIP in accordance with the requirements of sections 110 and 116 of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act) and will result in emission reductions needed to help ensure attainment … Clean Air Act.

Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Project Cypress Direct Air Capture (DAC) Hub; Notice of Potential Floodplain and Wetland Involvement, DOE/EIS-0567

Federal Register · Notice · Nov 1, 2024

Comments received or postmarked after the scoping period end date will be considered to the extent practicable. … After the public comment period ends, DOE will review and respond to comments received and will develop the final EIS.

Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision, Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District

Federal Register · Rule · Jan 21, 1999

The intended effect of this action is to bring the AVAPCD SIP up to date in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule.

Implementation Plan and Redesignation Request for the Muscogee County, Georgia Lead Nonattainment Area

Federal Register · Rule · Apr 12, 1999

All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision; South Coast Air Quality Management District; Ventura County Air Pollution Control District; Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 19, 1999

The intended effect of this action is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. DATES: Written comments must be received by September 20, 1999.

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Approval of the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District-Reasonably Available Control Technology Analysis

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 12, 2008

We are approving the analysis under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island; Reasonable Further Progress Plans and 2002 Base Year Emission Inventories

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 20, 2010

Background and Purpose On April 30, 2004, pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act, or CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., EPA designated portions of the country as being in nonattainment of the … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; To Prevent and Control Air Pollution From the Operation of Hot Mix Asphalt Plants

Federal Register · Rule · Oct 11, 2002

EPA is approving this revision to the SIP in accordance with the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans, State of California, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, New Source Review

Federal Register · Rule · Aug 1, 2013

Air Act. … Subdivision (c) provides that nothing in that section limits a district's authority to regulate a source over which it otherwise has jurisdiction under the Clean Air Act or any Clean Air Act rules or regulations

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Indiana

Federal Register · Rule · Jun 25, 2003

Public Comments EPA did not receive any public comments on the proposed rulemaking. The comment period closed on May 9, 2003. IV. … EPA proposed approval of these revisions on April 9, 2003 (68 FR 17331) and received no comments during the 30-day comment period.

Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Alaska

Federal Register · Rule · May 16, 1996

As a general matter, apart from the exceptions cited in section 116, the Clean Air Act (CAA) does not restrict a state's authority to impose air pollution controls in addition to those required under the … Temporary Suspension of the Regulation's Applicability to Fairbanks The commenter stated that the provisions of section 211(m) ``Oxygenated Fuels'' of the Federal 1990 Clean Air Act applies to both

Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Oil and Grease and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons; Notice of Availability and Request for Comment

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 2, 1997

The proposed rule is necessary to meet compliance monitoring requirements of CWA and the chlorofluorocarbon phaseout requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments. … Method 1664 was proposed under the authority of Sections 301, 304(h), and 501(a) of CWA and the authority of sections 604, 606, and 613 of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments.

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Delaware Enhanced Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) Program

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 7, 1999

Delaware revised its I/M SIP to improve air quality and to meet requirements of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (the Act) for an enhanced I/M program. … We will address all comments in a subsequent final rule. There will be no second comment period, so those wishing to comment must do so before the comment period closes. I.

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; North Carolina: Approval of Miscellaneous Revisions to The Mecklenburg County Local Implementation Plan

Federal Register · Rule · Oct 22, 2002

All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Placer County Air Pollution Control District and Feather River Air Quality Management District

Federal Register · Rule · Jul 27, 2011

We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III.

Ambient Air Quality Surveillance and Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Louisiana; Modification of Ozone Monitoring Season and Revisions to Geographical Boundaries of Air Quality Control Regions

Federal Register · Rule · Sep 10, 2002

The EPA designates boundaries of AQCRs under section 107 of the Federal Clean Air Act (Act), and codifies them at 40 CFR part 81, subpart B (Designation of Air Quality Control Regions). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.