Documents

Oral argument — Yakoby v. Trustees Uni v. Penn

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 27, 2026

Is it your view that Penn should have acted within a particular time period to stop it? What would have been reasonable behavior here? … I can't remember exactly what the allegations were the alley, the actual acts that she alleged are the two comments that occurred as she was passing by the demonstrations in neither of those instances

Oral argument — Jacobs Project Management v. United States Department of the Interior

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2023

But when you twice declined to comment or give evidence on the merits, aren't you saying, in effect, I'm waiving? No, Your Honor. I don't believe that would constitute a knowing and volunteering. … have any authority to act.

Oral argument — Robert Freedman v. Sumner M. Redstone

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2014

It's the position of the restatement of Judgment Second, Section 27, Comment C. It was the decision of Judge Broderick in the Papianu case. It is the general view that that is the rule. … for this time period we're talking about, seven years, unless the party opposing collateral estoppel can show that circumstances have changed.

Oral argument — Adorers of Blood of Christ v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2022

And so Adores was one of a small subset of landowners who got a special letter from FERC asking for comments. FERC got 100 comments. … First of all, I think under RFRA, because the government is broadly defined, Transco in the exercise of condemnation was acting as the government as RFRA defines it. For what period of time?

Oral argument — In Re Effexor XR Antitrust Litigation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2017

I mean, we hear the plaintiffs talking about the NMA, the Medicaid Modernization Act, and the procedure. So you're writing this opinion. What test would you put it down? … They wrote a letter that says, we understand no one's going to raise the anti-competitive issues, so therefore we're not going to comment. We reserve rights.

Oral argument — USAv.Liburd

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2010

The where's the evidence was in response to comments made by the defense at his closing argument. And he was challenging. … government was acting in bad faith or not.

Oral argument — Doe v. Mercy Catholic

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2016

There's a much shorter time period. There's mediation. There are various remedies under Title VII for employees to file these kinds of claims. … And so in Title VI, in Title IX, in 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and in the Age Discrimination Employment Act, identical definition. But, Doe, we have a minimum ambiguity.

Oral argument — Howmedica Osteonics v. Zimmeretal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2013

Groveland, all it was was a chance comment when he was walking through the office. That was Groveland, but that wasn't Giebelhaus. That was Groveland. … It was not for a set period of time. It's right in the judge's findings at page 44, lines 4 through 25.

Oral argument — Santos v. Warden Pike County

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2020

Detention may become unreasonable even where the government has acted reasonably. … When you talk about Congress acting constitutionally, it seems to me you're getting into a facial challenge. The issue here isn't whether or not Congress acted constitutionally or unconstitutionally.

Oral argument — In Re Lamictal Direct

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2020

That's why the class period can start before generic launch. … And the other thing I would say, Your Honors, is we don't view that comment as a sea change from hydrogen peroxide.

Oral argument — USHorticultural Supplyvs The Scotts Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2009

There is evidence in the record that over that period of four years it favored Griffin in various ways. … Would you be willing to comment right at the onset about what he just said? Now, we all know there are a number of documents that were produced here.

Oral argument — United States v. Johns

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

It doesn't fit the requirements that the Sentencing Act makes, that it's not to be any greater than is necessary to serve the purposes of the Sentencing Act. It's before Higgs. … There was no comment by anything. He didn't explain. He didn't say, well, I should have given six extra months for his character. I should have given seven, ten months less for something.

Oral argument — Douglass v. Covergent

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2014

but the Act again going back to the Act which is to bar unfair and unconscionable methods of debt collection but the Act does cite invasion of privacy as a core concern so then we get to the second question … be used as persuasive authority I don't know that it rises to the level of a formal rulemaking that would be there however the fact that it is out there the fact that these cases have existed for this period

Oral argument — Apex Construction v. US Virgin Islands

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2023

Federal courts are subject to congressionally mandated periods of time during which they must dispose of certain types of cases. … Thank you for your comment, sir. Do you agree that in order to actually show your entitlement to the department, you have to be consensual.

Oral argument — Govatos v. Murphy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2025

To both standing questions, it can't be the case that the only period of time when this law could be challenged, the Constitution could be challenged, is in the narrow six-month window between when somebody … And this is kind of the heart of what we think the District Court, in a very comprehensive decision, aired.

Oral argument — In Re Barry LMichael

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2012

And once the plan ends, once the Chapter 7 bankruptcy is, it's converted to Chapter 7, then that starts a new period. … But does it, I guess why we're here is, does it convert everything that came in during the old period into part of the estate?

Oral argument — Schaffner v. Monsanto Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2023

In fact, there are agency regulations that do involve notice and comment for this. The statutory re-registration in 1993 for glyphosate did go through notice and comment. … have to say, well the Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania law regarding a strict liability claim for failure to warn has been consistent for all for many, many years and, and for all of the period

Oral argument — Gold v. Ford Motor Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2014

In other words, you're saying that they went contrary to what they normally did in the way they acted here in setting the ex-distribution date and the due bill period? … Finally, with regard to Three Rivers, I just want to comment again that the court did not look exclusively at the language of the rule there.

Oral argument — Et Al_In Re Image Masters v. ABNAMRO

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2026

So I'm not suggesting there's evidence that they had a direct view of red flags or they had observed them or commented on them. … If they hadn't owned it for a period of time, they wouldn't have been the servicer, I think.

Oral argument — Newspaper Newsprint Magazine v. PG Publishing Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2020

A response and an additional comment about that language in the letter. Go ahead. … I can't say with certainty, but my understanding is that they haven't acted then assuming that's correct as nobody's got to write.