Documents

Oral argument — 04-17333 Peake v. Chevron Shipping

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2006

This was the critical time period just before the plaintiff's employment was terminated. … He went in there and came clean and said, I feel terrible about this. This all arose out of my problems with my back and then my divorce.

Oral argument — United States v. Jerome Loew

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2009

So let me clean the facts up a little bit. … I am going to ask the court questions based on counsel's comments.

Oral argument — Buttonwood Tree Value Partners v. Deloitte & Touche

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2016

They still issued clean opinions. They still didn't make them increase their loan loss reserves. … Can you act with cyanar if the representations are, you don't believe the representations to be false?

Oral argument — Sierra Forest Legacy v. Sherman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2010

The agency comes in and cleans up the brush. … I would submit in my limited time that the Forest Service gave very focused, hard look on those particular comments.

Oral argument — Universal Welding & Fab. v. USACE.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 16, 2017

The 14 or so acres of low-functioning wetlands that are on Universal Welding's Fairbanks property fall outside of the jurisdictional authority of the Army Corps of Engineers under the Clean Water Act, … One is the question of, are these features otherwise subject to the outermost limits of congressional delegated authority under the Clean Water Act?

Oral argument — Mousa v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2023

On appeal, the BIA acted as a fact finder and replaced the IJ's decision with its own. This the Board cannot do. … Mousa's over 20 arrests and convictions over a 10-year period to reasonably infer that Mr. Mousa is likely to attract the attention of Egyptian authorities and be detained.

Oral argument — Lanphere Enterprises v. Doorknob Enterprises

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2005

Granted, the survey was taken at certain points in time, but the survey did not limit itself, as I recall, to ads aired during any particular time period. … And here we're not saying that the ads that aired in time period one have continued to cause us damage alone.

Oral argument — Special Investments v. Twin Commander

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2003

I'll start by addressing my comments to the questions that have come from the Court with regard to the issue of subject matter jurisdiction. … With regard to Arrow Air, it did go the other way. But Arrow Air was a different case.

Oral argument — United States v. Edwin Carr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013

He definitely made some comments about it. Why were his comments insufficient? Because they weren't directly tied to the numbers. … That means that this additional enhancement is, is, is air. I mean, or the distinction between the two is air.

Oral argument — United States v. KNOPFLE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2004

And under the Clean Water Act, it's very clear, and the appropriate regulation is very clear to which agency the defendant must report. … And had the defendant been convicted of under 33 U.S.C. 1319c1, a negligent violation of the Clean Water Act, that might have been sufficient.

Oral argument — United States v. Ryan Seideman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2012

There was a description, and there are reports that actually relate to that description, and I believe it was a Nike air trainer shoe's tread pattern was what was determined, and that was in the reports … How about the potential, I guess, prosecutorial misconduct here regarding the objection that the defense made to the belt and the comment that the prosecutor made?

Oral argument — Carroll Sievers v. LABR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2009

We're looking at the Board's decision, and we're determining whether the Board is supported by substantial evidence or acted arbitrarily and capriciously otherwise. … Moreover, in this case, there was a specific notice and comment period.

Oral argument — Twentieth Century Fox Internat v. Gemini Film International

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2010

Schlicht's hands may not be entirely clean in this matter does not absolve Mr. Scriba, nor does it impact the jurisdictional analysis as to Mr. Scriba's involvement. … Act like that. I know that's a light comment, but here's the question. If we were to permit some limited discovery, would Fox be able to take Dr.

Oral argument — Elin Phifer v. Icelandair

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2011

I'm counsel for Appali Iceland Air in this matter. … It doesn't list a single periodical that says this is the way it should be done. And, and, and that's it.

Oral argument — Montana Admin v. Goldin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2004

Those mines were not being cleaned up. They were declared bankruptcy in Reno, Nevada, seeking bankruptcy protection. There were ongoing environmental exigencies needed to be cleaned up right away. … No, and actually let me comment on that. How could you not? Wasn't that part an integral part of the liquidation plan?

Oral argument — C.S. v. Desert Sand Unified

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2008

Let me ask you, you made a comment. You don't necessarily agree the parents didn't cooperate. They've not provided records. They were unwilling to reschedule. … They call it clean hands. I understand. And we don't think that's the case. Because the evidence was that the parents invited the school district to their home to observe.

Oral argument — BELEI v. CASTRO

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2004

Your Honor, that is entirely out of thin air. There is no — Well, that is, but the Menendez brothers are not out of thin air. The Menendez brothers, there truly was no evidence in it. … The Menendez brothers' comment is the capstone to all of that.

Oral argument — Kane v. PaCap Aviation Finance, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2026

and the Warren Act. … We wouldn't have all the Warren Act issues, the Dislocated Workers Act issues, the liability issues. It would be a much more focused trial as to this point. And again, it's...

Oral argument — Smart Apparel (U.S.), Inc. v. Nordstrom, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2025

Nordstrom acted, pulled the trigger after the press release. Correct. … Yes, and we're saying that the contract doesn't give a notice and cure period and say we must do further investigations.

Oral argument — United States v. Abdul Howard

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2016

on January 10th, 1970, WhileSnaga is the coercer of Black air in the United States, because history is well beginning to retie him. continued to blase with a double cadence toward him. … That may well have been the case. genres in different periods of time, including explosiveness that may well have been the case.