Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

949 results

0.11s

  • Oral argument — United States v. Charlie Song

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2013

    Well, Your Honor, I think, first of all, the courts over a period of time now, in many cases, have identified our legitimate governmental interest in having the evaluation done in custody. … And it's done during the time period that he is now alleging that he was insane to the extent that he couldn't understand the nature and wrongfulness of his acts.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. William White

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2015

    A requires the same victim and the same act. Respectfully, we think that clearly four different extortionate threats over 12 days is not the same act. … And this was, by the way, not just one passing comment on the witness stand by Mr. White.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — David Lee v. Fort Mill, Town Of

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2017

    I think what is also significant is a lot of the comments by his girlfriend on the videotape. You can hear her afterwards. … Lee, but you can hear him, and he is just cursing, absolutely acting hysterical and irrational.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Carla Calobrisi v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2016

    And, for instance, the Foreign Corrupt Trade Act anti-bribing statutes, which are big deals for government contractors, as the court is well aware. … There's a reference, you know, Sam's thoughts are this, Horacio's comments are that.

    55 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jonatan Pornomo v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2015

    Process Act. … so as to extend the time when it's set forth in the statute, period.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jane Doe-2 v. Sheriff of Richland County

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2022

    Coming back to some of the affirmative acts, these affirmative acts continue into 2016. … The specialty statute sets a finite time period.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Union Carbide Corporation v. Virginia Richards

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2013

    I believe the comment period has now expired, but the period for the Department to respond to those comments is still ongoing, and there still has to be some review by OMB and all the others. … And then Congress comes in and says, during the period, during the actual period back to 2005, we're going to allow her to make a claim with these benefits. What's your state on that?

    73 min of audio
  • Oral argument — US ex rel. Benjamin Carter v. Halliburton Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2017

    It's a short period of time. … And one of the points they make is that, remember, under the False Claims Act, the currency for the government under the False Claims Act is information.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Carl Summers v. Altarum Institute, Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2013

    Summers never specifically stated that he must work from home or from some indefinite period. … I'll keep my comments very brief.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jeffrey Gray v. Frederick County, Maryland

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2013

    And being under a plein air standard of review, how do we reach your point when there's nothing incorrect about 23 and you didn't object to it on that? Well, we did object to it. … Gray, and that the jury found, as a matter of fact, that the officer's acts did not cause the death of Mr. Gray. We may or may not agree with the jury, but that was the jury's finding of fact.

    53 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sharise Parker v. Children's National Medical Center, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2025

    She was on a probationary period. But the evidence of discrimination with respect to pregnancy, where is it? … Animus usually reflected in side comments or an e-mail here or there or a quip. We have none of that here. Well, we do have when Ms.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Stop R.E.I.D. v. Federal Election Commission

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2015

    To the extent that it's a waiting period, it absolutely would. Not any waiting period, a period that you'd have to be formed in enough time to meet those requirements. … But we go about sort of acting as if it does.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Jorge Sanchez-Garcia

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2023

    The 1952 Act was a reenactment of 1929, and that 1952 Act still was tethered to the racial animus that surrounded the enactment in 1929. … It's the context surrounding it, the historical backdrop of what is happening, the Mexican repatriation, the Braceros program, all of that that's happening during this time period.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Brian Davison v. Phyllis Randall

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2018

    The pages I just cited were comments by Mr. Davison, critical of Ms. Randall, accusing members of the local government of engaging in criminal acts. … In the seven-and-a-half-month period, Mr. Davis went on and continued to comment freely. Then the additional ---- Excuse me, Mr. Gann.

    57 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Senderra RX Partners, LLC v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2022

    Am I correct that during the period of time that you needed to meet the qualifications in order to get into one of the entry periods, specific dates you have to complete the requirements by in order to … Your client never had an actual dispensary in the initial time period. Is that right?

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Georgia Pacific Consumer v. Von Drehle Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2013

    It's your view that that section, that comment means that the jury verdict in this case could be the inconsistency that animates that principle? … Turning back, Your Honor, to the question of reasonable conduct by Vondrell, as I stated, there's no basis in the record for Georgia Pacific's contention that by failing to act in that three-week period

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Oakley Baldwin v. City of Greensboro

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2013

    But that was the extent of their comment on it. So that being the case with that silence, I think the Landgraf test is not meant for retroactivity. … But there was about a two-year period there in between when the file was closed at the plaintiff's request.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Victor Oloyede

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2018

    That is a clean cut, something pulled from the data. … But you can't give permission to act unlawfully. That's what this court found in Otuya, that you cannot give consent to act unlawfully.

    75 min of audio
  • Oral argument — James B. Angell v. Stubbs & Perdue, P.A.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2015

    If we get a court order, we act in accordance with the court order. … The acts that occurred that we referred to are the acts of our services to the Chapter 11. And just what is what was wrong with the trustee's argument?

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Edgar Searcy

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2017

    I believe Judge Harris also made similar comments. I'll just give an example of it. In the case of U.S. v. … Now you've got this entire period of time awaiting his nearer to release provision. But Mr.

    39 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.