Documents

Oral argument — Energy Intelligence Grp, Inc. v. Kayne Ande

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2019

They had to act reasonably. … If you, there's a cruel and you wait, you're limited to the statute of limitations period. Well, I'm glad you qualify.

Oral argument — Mueck v. La Grange Acquisitions

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2022

Jacob Field Services, that the ADA Amendments Act was a game changer. It completely changed this area of the law. That's where Congress had said, you know what, the courts are not doing this right. … And he's alleged that it virtually knocked him out completely from all activities, couldn't even clean his house or anything.

Oral argument — Martha Lockett v. Houston Indep School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2018

What's the most biased example of the judge's comments? … , then the plaintiff can show a series of related acts, one or more of which falls in the limitation period, then she's okay.

Oral argument — Karin Kristensen v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2020

Each of these three incorrect legal rulings cause reversible air, which is reviewed under the de novo standard. The court should reverse and render. … Those are exceptions to the Federal Tort Claims Act. Once the court finds the Federal Tort Claims Act applies, then those are exceptions that would have to be proved.

Oral argument — United States v. Channing Miller

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2016

And that's because the guidelines and the Sentencing Reform Act require that sort of uniformity. … If there's, I mean it's not a chastisement, but I mean both, and I'm not alluding that somebody sold air here. That's not my point. But just, the sentencing is going on. And it's regular.

Oral argument — League of Untd Latin American v. Edwards Aq

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2019

The EAA Act still limits the, I mean, that's a, it was a parade of horribles that was discussed when the Act was initially formed. … So, another way of asking that is, is if the voters of San Antonio would, what really is the range of their impact period?

Oral argument — Jakarta Grogan v. Triton Diving Services, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2015

Without having compressed air cylinders with manifolds positioned on the back deck of the Triton Achiever, so the Triton crew could access oxygen if H2S was encountered. … I think there was but in terms of the act of doing the inviting, it was W&T from the point of saying we want to use Tiger to getting the purchase order to dictating how and what equipment was sent out

Oral argument — Edenfield v. New Orleans City

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2025

So, you know, isn't the city entitled to say that a police officer should not be posting this kind of comment about lawless and riotous behavior, period? … Thus, the period was told. I'm just saying, if the case has said that, I'm going to read it. So, we do also cite Hillard v.

Oral argument — Smith v. City of Bastrop

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2022

They were just not submitted and approved and had – for open comment. Is that correct? … And so those are the comments of which you see the plaintiff trying to blame. As we sit here today, is there any interest in that total?

Oral argument — Greenbrier Hospital, L.L.C. v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2020

And under review under the Administrative Procedure Act, that's not an arbitrary and capricious decision. That's not contrary to law. … Is CMS said we want to have this three year transition period. When we see comments on that. And they got a lot of comments.

Oral argument — Google, Incorporated v. James Hood, III

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2015

It's full of a lot of atmospherics where they're telling the public, we're going to make sure Google's clean. … And the Supreme Court said, no, there's not an exhaustion requirement under 1983, period. Your first point about threats would be piecemeal.

Oral argument — United States v. Francis Guerra Pleitez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

Well, but wasn't the third addendum amount predicated on the Fair Labor Standards Act and not on actual earnings? … , and that it should be the higher of the gain to the defendants or the Fair Labor Standards Act, the probation officer.

Oral argument — Maurice Goudeau v. National Oilwell Varco, L.P.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2015

Within that time span, his testimony shows that within that time period, these comments were made on a repeated basis. It wasn't just an isolated set of comments made on one occasion. … It was during this relevant period of time which ultimately led . . . Are the comments having to do with the old farts or are the comments having to do with I'm going to fire him.

Oral argument — City of Hearne, Texas v. Milton Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018

Rodney Burns, the 1976 Supreme Court case, which says the loss of First Amendment freedoms for even minimal periods of time unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury. … But you still got your petition in front of the city council, and the city council still acted on or prepared to act on the merits of it one way or the other.

Oral argument — Charles Ikekwere v. Department of the Treasury

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2018

Most of them were before that 45-day period. … Equiquere that he did not believe that he had closed these cases, and those kinds of comments to Mr.

Oral argument — Joseph Dacar v. Saybolt L.P.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018

The Department of Labor's 2008 proffer to amend it was going through notice and comment during this time period and would have been a notice and comment regulation had that process been followed, but instead … No, that's the definition of regular rate in all contexts under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Oral argument — Ashford v. Aviation Technical Svc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2023

As Magistrate Kaye noted, they requested attorney's fees under the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act, which does entitle them by statute potentially to treble damages. … We heard some comments about this being a second fight at the apple and questions about the Southwest Erector's case and the new factual basis.

Oral argument — Ureteknologia v. Uretek

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2021

Uretek did not mention the Covenant Not to Compete Act in the pretrial order. … And then, yet again, I would also note, as we've stated over and over again in our briefing and otherwise, the case was not tried under the Covenant Not to Compete Act. No mention of this act.

Oral argument — Manson Gulf, L.L.C. v. Modern Amer Recycl Svc., In

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017

I suggest to you that the expert and experienced stevedore would act in exactly and precisely the way that Mr. Smith acted, not in the way that Mr. … LaFleur acted, and that while it is unfortunate that Mr.

Oral argument — FBCC CityPoint v. Austin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2026

There's a time period during the employment, there's a time period after the employment. … And that's within a 24 month period.