Documents

Oral argument — Adamo v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2007

There were constant demeaning and belittling comments. She was excluded from information she needed. … It's job-related, but it's not an improper act of the agency.

Oral argument — BIGGERS v. NAVY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013

If the court were to look at the Back Pay Act, which is a statute Congress enacted, it does not make that distinction. The Back Pay Act, which is Section 5596, says nothing about the ground of it. … period.

Oral argument — Roberson v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2010

Appreciate those kind comments but the honor is mine. Thank you. Very well the first case for argument is number 2009-7093 Roberson against the Department of Veterans Affairs. Ms. Booth. … of omission by VA as opposed to acts of commission.

Oral argument — CGI Federal Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2015

And that obviously would be a completely futile act under Dolan's. … The act of submitting a bid would be one where we would have to submit a noncompliant quote that takes exception to the offending terms that we believe are unlawful, and then in a period when the government

Oral argument — Amgen Inc. v. Apotex Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2016

happen until after the 12 year exclusivity period. … That's the act of infringement. And then Section 271E4 says the remedies that are listed herein are the only remedies that can be given for an act of infringement under Section 271E2C2.

Oral argument — Motorola v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 9, 2007

But it seems to me that there's no requirement of how many times customs has to act. It just has to be multiple times. … And then my final comment, I'll save the rest of my time after my final comment for rebuttal, is on the Chevron issue, which I think is looming out there.

Oral argument — REGENTS UNIV MINNESOTA v. KAPPOS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2011

But outside this 30-month period- Unintentional or unavoidable? Unintentional. Within six months? Within the six-month grace period. With the six-month grace period. … I'll first address some of the comments made by the intervener, AGA. Nowhere in our briefs, nowhere in the position below, did we ever try to rewrite Section 41C.

Oral argument — CRFD Research, Inc. v. DISH Network Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2017

But looking at the larger intent of the American Vence Act, I find this very strange. Yeah, well, it's true. … I'd like to begin with comments that were made by my friend concerning the idle period. This goes to the Bates reference. In fact, the board discussed this at length in their opinion.

Oral argument — SUFI Network Services, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2014

that's referenced that references the term deemed denial, which of course is not a term that's entirely appropriate with the context of this case because it's not a CDA case, but that email is from an Air … And what's your authority in, again, in, in the, in the pre, uh, CDA landscape that only the contracting officer could act on behalf of the agency with respect to claims?

Oral argument — Tokyo Kikai v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2008

And it cited the 1916 Act judgment to support that conclusion. … Two brief comments on rebuttal.

Oral argument — Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Ltd v. Matal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2017

We did notice some comment on the definition of proceeding, and nobody asked for it to apply based on when the patent was filed. … That rule, I'd just like to point out, relates not to all time periods but only to periods to provide documents or fees, not to the 30-month period.

Oral argument — Takeda Pharma v. Teva Pharma

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2010

I would have two comments with respect to the prosecution history. … Fasidi's untested theory attributing the disintegration of the Anda product to the amorphous lactose content in Starlac, period.

Oral argument — Utstarcom v. Starent Networks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2007

Why didn't he say it switched over to the same old acting PPP session? That's what you're telling me. And that's what he said. Yes, Your Honor. … And then, Your Honor, just one last comment.

Oral argument — Suprema, Inc. v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2015

But again, Your Honor, this court in the Sealed Air case talked about this. … act?

Oral argument — +Monsanto Company v. Scruggs

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2006

What's your comment on that? That's not really addressed. … I did want to make one comment about, at least about the seed cartel arguments.

Oral argument — ITG Voma Corporation v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2019

This appeal concerns the unlawful application by the United States International Trade Commission of the Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, or TPEA. … The only opportunity that we had to provide comment, Your Honor, were comments on the factual record, which were due on July 10.

Oral argument — Snyder v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2017

And the distinction that counsel is trying to make between periodic monetary benefit that's no longer being a periodic monetary benefit, that's really just a red herring because accrued benefits are periodic … And that question of eligibility was favorably decided and then acted upon, and those funds were distributed to Mr. Snyder.

Oral argument — Calderon v. Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2026

The Veterans Court was aware of these mental conditions, and said it's still not enough to prevent him from either acting rationally or undertaking to file a timely notice of appeal. … Did you allege the PTSD, mental illness, and dementia aspect of that, that it covered the entire period that we're talking about, the tolling period?

Oral argument — JONES v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2011

That act is 128. And in that case, the question was whether it was a timely notice or a seal issue. … I just have a quick comment on the whole question of the fact that obviously the regulation does not specifically require writing.

Oral argument — Snyder v. McDonough

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2021

Economy Act of 1933, that authority was taken away in the Act of 1957. … But then setting the time period at 90 days, the Secretary chose a period of time that's actually much more generous to the veterans.