Documents

Oral argument — Lair v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2007

There were discussions that took place between me and the agency attorney and it was just sort of left up in the air. … Do you think that he acted appropriately at all times?

Oral argument — People v. Moore

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2018

The trial court aired... There was a charge that stated the offense. It was amended during trial, correct? Correct. We had a valid charge pre-trial, during trial. … The allegation that defendant with the requisite intent attempted to kill and murder unnamed victim was sufficient to describe an act which constituted a substantial step toward the commission of the murder

Oral argument — Susan Bender v. Champlain Enterprises LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 27, 2019

I represent Champlain Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Commute Air. I will refer to Appley as Commute Air, so there's no confusion. … And they say her standing up is insubordination when she's acting in the interest of aircraft and aircrew and the public safety.

Oral argument — Jason Krembel v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2020

And where do you get the waiver of the sovereign immunity under the Federal Tort Claims Act? How do you get this under the Federal Tort Claims Act? Well, under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Go ahead. … And it was that five-week period. And so essentially, Mr. Krimble's case is that during that five-week period, the BOP didn't ensure that I got my Mohs surgery done.

Oral argument — American Future Fund, Inc. v. New York City Campaign Finance Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2026

Yes, and we were trying to get the district court to act on our P.I. on an expedited basis, so we... Right. … But they've like bought airtime for the ad to air on June 5th. We wouldn't be, the court would not be able to determine in that short time period whether you're right or wrong.

Oral argument — Sanchez v. Sec US Dept Homeland Security.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020

As soon as the earthquake gets cleaned up, if we send people back right away, it might be different. … And so it doesn't cure the prior period that he was not in lawful status. He entered the United States in 1997.

Oral argument — In re: Murphy-Brown, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2018

I normally think of voluntary cessation as the acts of a party going forward, not the independent acts of a court. Well, I think there are two answers to that, Judge Agee. … So are you opposed to any order restricting comments on the case? I mean, what about...

Oral argument — Hua v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2011

I think the point is more whether or not his activity in supporting this group by coming to the United States, by arranging for resources to get to them, was an act that the government of Vietnam directed … How do you think the BIA and IJ aired in their analysis of the credibility of your client?

Oral argument — Thermoflex Waukegan, LLC v. Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2024

The period placed by the court isn't there. In fact, the clause itself, you know, reads as follows. … , the Act.

Oral argument — Experian Information Solutions v. Nationwide Marketing Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

You know, the fact that you can put airplanes heavier than air objects up in the air and have them fly around and not fall down. You know, all those things are preexisting facts. … You just made an irrelevant comment. Nobody claims that the process is secret.

Oral argument — First v. Rolling Plains Implement

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2024

I will be addressing issues one and two, which one is that the district court aired as a matter of law and granting judgment to Rolling Plains and issue two, which is the district court aired in granting … They had a period of protection guaranteed, if you will. And as I saw it, the jury latched on to that particular date, which was on its face. It's not obvious why.

Oral argument — National Biodiesel Board v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2016

It requires notice and comment, and I'll put an asterisk on that because I think it's very important to explain why notice and comment is necessary under the aggregate approach, but it also requires annual … Water Act was a rule.

Oral argument — Phillips v. Whittington

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2022

But one cannot expect that no mistakes would be made over this period of time. … And that problem is, is that if one broadens the definition of evidence to include all acts of vandalism within a geographical area that occurs about the same time that other acts of vandalism occurs,

Oral argument — Underwood v. Bank of America Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2021

I just wondered if we might need something to clean that up in the record. I know you've got your other agenda, but I'm concerned. … Underwood registered the domain name, my24erica.com, you know, back in the early 2012 period.

Oral argument — In Re Petition of Frescati

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017

Most of these cases, trial judges are not looking at a period of 11 years and $143 million loss at the outset. … I mean, the key here is to get that cleaned up in the first instance and then sort of sort out kind of who's responsible for it. But, you know, Judge Hardiman, you're absolutely right.

Oral argument — Xyavier Calliste v. Xeng Lor

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2025

There's about a six second period of time between when the vehicle lurches towards and comes at the officers and the officers begin firing. … I'm not going to comment on that one way or the other because I don't think that's material. I think what's material . . . Well, you put it in your brief. That's what he testified to. Okay.

Oral argument — United States v. Harshad Shah

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2019

It seems that entrapment is in the air this morning. … But to get back to the issue of racist comment, it is not the issue before this court, factual or legal. In fact, we conceded that Dr. Shah started the discussion about being from India both.

Oral argument — Jody Hill v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2014

The time period was a little bit shorter. They changed the alleged onset date, and there was some additional evidence at the end, and the ALJ redid it. … I would like to address his comments about law of the case as well.

Oral argument — Ali v. Ashcroft

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003

I don't really represent the Board of Immigration Appeals because the government, the executive branch, acts as a prosecutor, if you will, a litigant, a party before the Board of Immigration Appeals. … The only major difference, or the only difference, and I would submit it makes no substantive difference, is the replacement of semicolons with periods.

Oral argument — United States v. Keith Barnett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2022

There you have the acts. … But the comment says, well, it also applies if he aided and abetted somebody else who created that unres...