Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.17s
Petitioners Reply Brief — American Iron & Steel Institute v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1983
Circuit has addressed the plantwide source issue' in the context of three different Clean Air Act programs with confusing, contradictory results. … Air Act amend that Act, review by this Court is unnecessary.
461 U.S. 956Federal Register · Rule · Oct 7, 2002
EPA is approving this revision to the SIP in accordance with the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 62381Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 21, 2021
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
86 FR 27524Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 5, 2002
This negative declaration certifies that small MWC units subject to the requirements of section 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) do not exist in Mississippi. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 67316Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 7, 1995
These final standards implement Section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended, which require the Administrator to regulate emissions of HAP listed in Section 112(b) of the CAA. … Upon request from interested parties the comment period on the proposed standards was extended to March 21, 1995, and the comment period on Method 311 was extended to April 21, 1995.
60 FR 62930Final Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions From WoodEnvironmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 1, 2018
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. DATES: This rule is effective on August 31, 2018. … Response to Comments EPA received 12 comments during the comment period, three of which are essentially identical.
83 FR 37437Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 30, 2000
The Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD) adopted the plan to meet the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for ozone areas classified as serious. … Air Act.
65 FR 16864Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 17, 2008
regulations under the [Clean Air Act (CAA or Act)].” … EPA has determined that this revision is approvable under the Clean Air Act. (i) Incorporation by reference.
73 FR 76560Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 1, 2021
EPA is taking this action pursuant to section 110 and Part C of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 3, 2021. … Requirements of the Clean Air Act and EPA's Regional Haze Rule B. Best Available Retrofit Technology C. Long-Term Strategy and Reasonable Progress Requirements D.
86 FR 17101Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Maintenance Plan Revisions; Ohio
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 20, 2004
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” … National Technology Transfer Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 43319Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 26, 2000
Background to Supplemental Proposal Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs us to establish NESHAP to control emissions from major and area stationary sources. … Following the proposal date, a 90-day comment period (April 20, 1998 to July 20, 1998) was provided to receive comments from the public.
65 FR 39326Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 28, 2021
Air Act (CAA) for the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). … The public comment period for this proposed rule ended on August 2, 2021. During the comment period, EPA received two comments on the proposed rule.
86 FR 53550Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 21, 2015
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 20, 2015. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
80 FR 2860Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 2, 2006
The public comment period will end at the same time as the public comment period for this proposed rule. … Air Act.
71 FR 57905Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 21, 2010
Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), judicial review of this final action is available only by filing a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the … In recognition of these issues, the Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule contains provisions establishing a transition period for developing emission limits for condensable direct PM 2.5 that
75 FR 80118Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 4, 2002
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
67 FR 62184Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 2, 2005
This plan was submitted to meet subparts 1 and 4 Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) planning requirements for the Wallula PM 10 serious nonattainment area. … What Comments Did We Receive on the Proposed Action? EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period on our proposal published in the Federal Register on February 1, 2005.
70 FR 22597Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Indiana
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 8, 2004
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” … National Technology Transfer Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 64661Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 20, 2007
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
72 FR 19829Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Feb 29, 2024
Abstract: Transportation conformity is required under Clean Air Act section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)) to ensure that federally supported transportation activities are consistent with (“conform to”) … Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory pursuant to Clean Air Act section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)) and 40 CFR part 93. Estimated number of respondents: 145 (total).
89 FR 14835Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.